Department of Economics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana.
National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2429569. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29569.
Chronic absenteeism among kindergarten through grade 12 students has increased considerably after the COVID-19 pandemic.
To examine the association between virtual learning during the 2020-2021 school year and chronic absenteeism during the 2021-2022 school year at the school district level.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used a panel of 11 017 school districts throughout the US comprising kindergarten through grade 12 for the 2018-2019 and 2021-2022 school years.
The key covariates were the percentage of hybrid and virtual school days in the previous school year, with an assumption that these values in the 2018-2019 school year were zero.
Chronic absenteeism rates at the district level, which were regressed on the percentage of school days in a learning mode in the previous school year, demographic characteristic and socioeconomic status controls, plus district and year fixed effects. Observations were weighted by district enrollment, and SEs were clustered at the district level.
The dataset includes 11 017 school districts for 2 years and 22 034 observations. Chronic absenteeism rates increased by 13.5 percentage points, from a mean (SD) of 15.9% (8.1%) in the 2018-2019 school year to 29.4% (13.2%) in the 2021-2022 school year. Students whose schools had 100% virtual instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic had chronic absenteeism rates that were 6.9 percentage points (95% CI, 4.8-8.9 percentage points) higher than those that were 100% in person. Hybrid instruction was not associated with increased absenteeism. The association between virtual learning and chronic absenteeism varied by socioeconomic status, with the conditional correlation much larger for at-risk students; chronic absenteeism rates were 10.6 percentage points (95% CI, 7.2-14.1 percentage points) higher among students with 100% of days in virtual learning from districts in the top quintile of poverty rates compared with 100% in-persion districts.
In this cross-sectional study, chronic absenteeism rates were substantially higher in school districts that used virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with in person. Understanding how to reduce chronic absenteeism and use virtual learning without potentially negative consequences are key policy questions moving forward.
自 COVID-19 大流行以来,幼儿园至 12 年级学生的慢性旷课率大幅上升。
在学区层面上,研究 2020-2021 学年期间的虚拟学习与 2021-2022 学年期间的慢性旷课之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:这项横断面研究使用了美国各地的 11017 个学区的面板,涵盖了 2018-2019 年和 2021-2022 年的幼儿园至 12 年级。
关键的协变量是前一学年中混合和虚拟上学日的百分比,假设该值在 2018-2019 学年为零。
学区层面的慢性旷课率,根据前一学年学习模式中的上学日百分比进行回归,同时控制人口统计学特征和社会经济地位,再加上学区和年份固定效应。观察结果按学区入学人数加权,标准误差按学区水平聚类。
数据集包括 2 年的 11017 个学区和 22034 个观测值。慢性旷课率从 2018-2019 学年的平均(标准差) 15.9%(8.1%)上升了 13.5 个百分点,达到 2021-2022 学年的 29.4%(13.2%)。在 COVID-19 大流行期间其学校完全实施虚拟教学的学生,其慢性旷课率比完全面授的学生高 6.9 个百分点(95%置信区间,4.8-8.9 个百分点)。混合教学与旷课率增加无关。虚拟学习与慢性旷课之间的关联因社会经济地位而异,在高风险学生中这种条件相关性更大;与完全面授的学区相比,来自贫困率最高五分位数的学区 100%的学生每天都接受虚拟学习,其慢性旷课率高出 10.6 个百分点(95%置信区间,7.2-14.1 个百分点)。
在这项横断面研究中,与面授相比,在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用虚拟学习的学区的慢性旷课率要高得多。了解如何在不产生潜在负面影响的情况下减少慢性旷课并使用虚拟学习,是今后的关键政策问题。