Suppr超能文献

在自行车运动员中,一项双盲随机交叉安慰剂对照试验显示,含咖啡因的咀嚼口香糖和预运动联合对摄氧量和基于近红外光谱技术的肌肉动力学没有影响。

No Combined Effect of Caffeinated Chewing Gum and Priming Exercise on Oxygen Uptake and Muscle Near-Infrared Spectroscopy-Derived Kinetics: A Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Placebo-Controlled Trial in Cyclists.

机构信息

Physical Effort Laboratory, Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, SC, Florianópolis, Brazil.

Human Performance Research Group, Center for Health and Sport Sciences, University of Santa Catarina State, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2024 Aug 21;34(6):340-348. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2023-0125. Print 2024 Nov 1.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of caffeine ingestion by chewing gum (GUMCAF) combined with priming exercise on pulmonary oxygen uptake (V˙O2) and near-infrared spectroscopy-derived muscle oxygen extraction (HHb + Mb) kinetics during cycling performed in a severe-intensity domain. Fifteen trained cyclists completed four visits: two under a placebo gum (GUMPLA) and two under GUMCAF ingestion. Each visit consisted of two square-wave cycling bouts at Δ70 intensity (70% of difference between the V˙O2 at first ventilatory threshold and V˙O2max) with duration of 6 min each and 5 min of passive rest between the bouts. The GUMPLA or GUMCAF (400 mg) was chewed for 5 min, 12 min before the first Δ70 bout in a randomized double-blind procedure. The fundamental phase and slow component of HHb + Mb and V˙O2 kinetics were evaluated. For HHb + Mb kinetics, regardless of ingested gum, priming exercise effects occurred on the time constant (GUMCAF 16.0 ± 4.0 vs. 13.9 ± 2.9 s; GUMPLA 15.7 ± 6.1 vs. 13.2 ± 2.5 s), amplitude, slow component, time delay, and mean response time parameters (p ≤ .032). For V˙O2 kinetics, there were significant effects of bouts on the amplitude, slow component, end V˙O2, and the gain kinetics parameters (p < .017). Baseline V˙O2 was higher during GUMCAF than GUMPLA (p = .020). No significant effects occurred for the interaction between gum and bout in any parameter of V˙O2 or HHb + Mb kinetics. Therefore, unlike the priming exercise in severe-intensity exercise, GUMCAF is not an effective strategy for improving V˙O2 or HHb + Mb kinetics acceleration.

摘要

这项研究旨在探究在剧烈强度运动域中进行自行车运动时,咀嚼口香糖(GUMCAF)联合预运动对肺氧摄取(V˙O2)和近红外光谱衍生肌肉氧提取(HHb + Mb)动力学的影响。15 名训练有素的自行车运动员完成了 4 次访问:2 次服用安慰剂口香糖(GUMPLA)和 2 次服用 GUMCAF 口香糖。每次访问包括两次方波自行车运动,强度为 Δ70(第一次通气阈值和 V˙O2max 之间的 V˙O2 的 70%),每次持续 6 分钟,两次之间有 5 分钟的被动休息。GUMPLA 或 GUMCAF(400mg)以随机双盲程序在第一次 Δ70 运动前 12 分钟咀嚼 5 分钟。评估了 HHb + Mb 和 V˙O2 动力学的基本阶段和慢成分。对于 HHb + Mb 动力学,无论口香糖是否摄入,预运动都会影响时变常数(GUMCAF 16.0 ± 4.0 与 13.9 ± 2.9s;GUMPLA 15.7 ± 6.1 与 13.2 ± 2.5s)、幅度、慢成分、时滞和平均响应时间参数(p≤0.032)。对于 V˙O2 动力学,回合对幅度、慢成分、终末 V˙O2 和增益动力学参数有显著影响(p < 0.017)。与 GUMPLA 相比,GUMCAF 时的基线 V˙O2 更高(p=0.020)。在 V˙O2 或 HHb + Mb 动力学的任何参数中,口香糖和回合之间的相互作用都没有产生显著影响。因此,与剧烈强度运动中的预运动不同,GUMCAF 不是改善 V˙O2 或 HHb + Mb 动力学加速的有效策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验