Suppr超能文献

全科医生转诊至记忆诊所的信件中的诊断信息:一项回顾性队列研究。

Diagnostic information in GP referral letters to a memory clinic: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Ronner Demi, Oostra Dorien, Claassen Jurgen, Richard Edo, Perry Marieke

机构信息

Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center (UMC) Alzheimer Center, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

BJGP Open. 2025 Apr 24;9(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0065. Print 2025 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dementia diagnostics can often be performed in primary care, yet older people with memory complaints are frequently referred to memory clinics (MCs).

AIM

To compare diagnostic information in GP referral letters of patients with and without an eventual dementia diagnosis.

DESIGN & SETTING: Retrospective cohort study in a Dutch academic MC.

METHOD

We collected electronic health record (EHR) data of consecutive patients aged ≥65 years referred by their GP between 2016 and 2020. EHR data included patient characteristics, diagnostic information in referral letters, ancillary investigations performed at the MC, and established diagnoses. We performed χ tests to compare groups.

RESULTS

Of 651 patients included, the average age was 78.0 years (standard deviation 6.8) and 348 (53.5%) were diagnosed with dementia. Most people with dementia were diagnosed without ancillary investigations ( = 235/348, 67.5%). In GP referral letters of people with dementia compared with people without dementia, a collateral history, any physical examination, a differential diagnosis including dementia, a Mini-Mental State Examination score, interference with daily functioning, and decline from previous levels of functioning were mentioned more often. Furthermore, the more diagnostic criteria mentioned in the referral letter, the more often dementia was diagnosed at the MC (no criteria: 35.4%; one criterion: 47.3%; two criteria: 53.4%; three criteria: 69.9%; and four or five criteria: 83.3%).

CONCLUSION

GPs often correctly mention diagnostic information and dementia criteria in referral letters of people with dementia, and they are often diagnosed without ancillary investigations. This suggests that referral is often unnecessary, and GPs can be empowered to diagnose dementia themselves.

摘要

背景

痴呆症诊断通常可在初级保健机构进行,但有记忆问题主诉的老年人却经常被转诊至记忆门诊(MCs)。

目的

比较最终被诊断为痴呆症和未被诊断为痴呆症患者的全科医生(GP)转诊信中的诊断信息。

设计与背景

在荷兰一家学术性记忆门诊进行的回顾性队列研究。

方法

我们收集了2016年至2020年间由全科医生转诊的连续≥65岁患者的电子健康记录(EHR)数据。EHR数据包括患者特征、转诊信中的诊断信息、在记忆门诊进行的辅助检查以及确诊情况。我们进行χ检验以比较各组。

结果

纳入的651例患者中,平均年龄为78.0岁(标准差6.8),348例(53.5%)被诊断为痴呆症。大多数痴呆症患者未经辅助检查即被诊断(=235/348,67.5%)。与未患痴呆症的患者相比,痴呆症患者的全科医生转诊信中更常提及旁系病史、任何体格检查、包括痴呆症在内的鉴别诊断、简易精神状态检查表评分、对日常功能的影响以及与之前功能水平的下降情况。此外,转诊信中提及的诊断标准越多,在记忆门诊被诊断为痴呆症的频率就越高(无标准:35.4%;一项标准:47.3%;两项标准:53.4%;三项标准:69.9%;四项或五项标准:83.3%)。

结论

全科医生在痴呆症患者的转诊信中经常正确提及诊断信息和痴呆症标准,且他们通常未经辅助检查即被诊断。这表明转诊往往没有必要,可赋予全科医生自行诊断痴呆症的权力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8106/12138024/bb98745e9469/bjgpopen-9-0065-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验