Picozzi R, Bossi M C, Arosio M, Palagi B, Razionale P, Zatta G, Tarolo G L
Servizio di Medicina Nucleare, Ospedale, Saronno, Italy.
Nucl Med Commun. 1985 Feb;6(2):97-108.
In order to compare the reliability of hepatobiliary scintigraphy using DISIDA (DHS) and ultrasonography (US) in the diagnosis of obstructive jaundice, 36 consecutive patients clinically suspected for obstruction were examined with both methods. Sixteen patients who were definitively shown to have obstruction, were all correctly detected with DHS; US was positive in 15 cases, revealing the cause of the obstruction in four cases. The site of obstruction was predicted in eight cases by DHS and in 11 cases by US. Associated gallbladder diseases were evaluated better by US than by DHS, but a perforation was only demonstrated clearly by DHS. In the 20 patients with nonobstructive disease the false positive results were found in one case using DHS and in two cases using US. In this series of patients DHS and US showed high sensitivity and specificity, which were further increased when the two techniques were combined.
为比较二异丙基乙酰胺(DHS)肝胆闪烁显像与超声检查(US)在诊断梗阻性黄疸中的可靠性,对36例临床怀疑有梗阻的连续患者进行了这两种检查。16例确诊为梗阻的患者,DHS均正确检测出;US在15例中呈阳性,其中4例明确了梗阻原因。DHS在8例中预测了梗阻部位,US在11例中预测了梗阻部位。US对相关胆囊疾病的评估优于DHS,但仅DHS清晰显示了一处穿孔。在20例非梗阻性疾病患者中,DHS有1例假阳性结果,US有2例假阳性结果。在这组患者中,DHS和US均显示出高敏感性和特异性,当两种技术联合使用时,敏感性和特异性进一步提高。