Suppr超能文献

辅助卵母细胞激活在具有各种生殖问题的夫妇中的临床应用:系统评价。

Clinical Applications of Assisted Oocyte Activation in Couples with Various Reproductive Problems: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Biology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Department of Anatomical Sciences, Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

出版信息

Reprod Sci. 2024 Oct;31(10):2916-2942. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01671-z. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

Abstract

ICSI may face fertilization failure, prompting the use of assisted oocyte activation (AOA) techniques. While AOA is implemented in infertility clinics, its target patients and definitive application remain uncertain. This systematic review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to assess reproductive outcomes in ICSI-AOA cycles compared to conventional ICSI and evaluate AOA effectiveness in various infertility disorders. A literature search encompassed PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus databases until December 2023 for relevant English studies. Included studies compared ICSI-AOA with conventional ICSI in couples with prior fertilization failure, utilizing diverse AOA methods. Control groups consisted of sibling oocytes, previous cycles of the same couples, or couples undergoing conventional ICSI. Evaluated outcomes included fertilization, cleavage, embryo quality, implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates. Article screening and data extraction were performed by two authors, with risk of bias assessed by another investigator. Out of 3088 initially identified articles, 30 studies were included, focusing on fertilization failure (n = 10), female infertility (n = 3), PLCζ defects (n = 4), poor sperm quality (n = 4), Globozoospermia (n = 4), and surgically retrieved sperm (n = 8). Most studies concluded that AOA could overcome fertilization failure, but success rates varied based on sperm-related or oocyte-related factors in ICSI-AOA cycles. Due to differences in patient inclusion criteria and sample sizes, most studies were not sufficiently similar for pooled analysis, limiting robust conclusions. There is insufficient evidence, particularly from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to determine the efficacy or safety of ICSI-AOA as a treatment strategy. Registration number is PROSPERO, CRD42024551221.

摘要

ICSI 可能面临受精失败,促使使用辅助卵母细胞激活(AOA)技术。虽然 AOA 在不孕不育诊所实施,但它的目标患者和明确应用仍不确定。本系统评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,评估与传统 ICSI 相比,ICSI-AOA 周期中的生殖结局,并评估 AOA 在各种不孕障碍中的有效性。文献检索涵盖了 PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE 和 Scopus 数据库,截至 2023 年 12 月,以获取相关的英文研究。纳入的研究比较了受精失败的夫妇中 ICSI-AOA 与传统 ICSI 的差异,使用了不同的 AOA 方法。对照组包括同对夫妇的姐妹卵母细胞、以前的周期或接受传统 ICSI 的夫妇。评估的结果包括受精率、卵裂率、胚胎质量、着床率、妊娠率和活产率。两名作者进行了文章筛选和数据提取,另一名研究者评估了偏倚风险。从最初确定的 3088 篇文章中,有 30 篇研究被纳入,重点关注受精失败(n=10)、女性不孕(n=3)、PLCζ 缺陷(n=4)、精子质量差(n=4)、Globozoospermia(n=4)和手术获取精子(n=8)。大多数研究得出结论,AOA 可以克服受精失败,但在 ICSI-AOA 周期中,由于与精子相关或与卵母细胞相关的因素,成功率有所不同。由于患者纳入标准和样本量的差异,大多数研究没有足够的相似性进行汇总分析,限制了得出强有力的结论。缺乏证据,特别是来自随机对照试验(RCT)的证据,无法确定 ICSI-AOA 作为治疗策略的疗效或安全性。注册号为 PROSPERO,CRD42024551221。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验