• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典儿科头部损伤指南的使用情况:一项关于成功实施临床实践指南的决定因素的横断面调查。

Pediatric head injury guideline use in Sweden: a cross-sectional survey on determinants for successful implementation of a clinical practice guideline.

机构信息

Department of Operation and Intensive Care, Halland Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden.

Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 21;24(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11423-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11423-z
PMID:39169324
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340051/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guideline (SNC-16) was developed and published in 2016, to aid clinicians in management of pediatric head injuries in Scandinavian emergency departments (ED). The objective of this study was to explore determinants for use of the SNC-16 guideline by Swedish ED physicians.

METHODS

This is a nationwide, cross-sectional, web-based survey in Sweden. Using modified snowball sampling, physicians managing children in the ED were invited via e-mail to complete the validated Clinician Guideline Determinants Questionnaire between February and May, 2023. Baseline data, data on enablers and barriers for use of the SNC-16 guideline, and preferred routes for implementation and access of guidelines in general were collected and analyzed descriptively and exploratory with Chi-square and Fisher's tests.

RESULTS

Of 595 invitations, 198 emergency physicians completed the survey (effective response rate 33.3%). There was a high reported use of the SNC-16 guideline (149/195; 76.4%) and a strong belief in its benefits for the patients (188/197; 95.4% agreement). Respondents generally agreed with the guideline's content (187/197; 94.9%) and found it easy to use and navigate (188/197; 95.4%). Some respondents (53/197; 26.9%) perceived a lack of organizational support needed to use the guideline. Implementation tools may be improved as only 58.9% (116/197) agreed that the guideline includes such. Only 37.6% (74/197) of the respondents agreed that the guideline clearly describes the underlying evidence supporting the recommendation. Most respondents prefer to consult colleagues (178/198; 89.9%) and guidelines (149/198; 75.3%) to gain knowledge to guide clinical decision making. Four types of enablers for guideline use emerged from free-text answers: ease of use and implementation, alignment with local guidelines and practice, advantages for stakeholders, and practicality and accessibility. Barriers for guideline use were manifested as: organizational challenges, medical concerns, and practical concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest high self-reported use of the SNC-16 guideline among Swedish ED physicians. In updated versions of the guideline, focus on improving implementation tools and descriptions of the underlying evidence may further facilitate adoption and adherence. Measures to improve organizational support for guideline use and involvement of patient representatives should also be considered.

摘要

背景

斯堪的纳维亚神经创伤委员会指南(SNC-16)于 2016 年制定并发布,旨在帮助斯堪的纳维亚急诊部门(ED)的临床医生管理儿科头部损伤。本研究的目的是探讨瑞典 ED 医生使用 SNC-16 指南的决定因素。

方法

这是一项全国性的、基于网络的瑞典横断面调查。使用改良的雪球抽样法,通过电子邮件邀请管理急诊科儿童的医生于 2023 年 2 月至 5 月之间填写经验证的临床医生指南决定因素问卷。收集并分析了基线数据、使用 SNC-16 指南的促进因素和障碍、以及一般指南的实施和获取途径的偏好,并进行了描述性和探索性的卡方和 Fisher 检验。

结果

在 595 份邀请中,198 名急诊医师完成了调查(有效应答率 33.3%)。报告的 SNC-16 指南使用率很高(149/195;76.4%),并且医生强烈认为该指南对患者有益(188/197;95.4%的一致性)。受访者普遍同意该指南的内容(187/197;94.9%),并认为该指南易于使用和导航(188/197;95.4%)。一些受访者(53/197;26.9%)认为缺乏使用该指南所需的组织支持。实施工具可能需要改进,因为只有 58.9%(116/197)的受访者同意该指南包含此类工具。只有 37.6%(74/197)的受访者同意该指南清楚地描述了支持建议的基础证据。大多数受访者更愿意咨询同事(178/198;89.9%)和指南(149/198;75.3%)以获取知识来指导临床决策。从自由文本答案中出现了四种使用指南的促进因素:易用性和可实施性、与当地指南和实践的一致性、对利益相关者的优势,以及实用性和可及性。使用指南的障碍表现为:组织挑战、医疗问题和实际问题。

结论

研究结果表明,瑞典 ED 医生自我报告的 SNC-16 指南使用率较高。在指南的更新版本中,关注改进实施工具和描述基础证据可能会进一步促进采用和遵守。还应考虑采取措施改善对指南使用的组织支持和患者代表的参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b868/11340051/c35678942035/12913_2024_11423_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b868/11340051/fb174d7e92a8/12913_2024_11423_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b868/11340051/19f42be868d7/12913_2024_11423_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b868/11340051/327c5fecaa51/12913_2024_11423_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b868/11340051/c35678942035/12913_2024_11423_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b868/11340051/fb174d7e92a8/12913_2024_11423_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b868/11340051/19f42be868d7/12913_2024_11423_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b868/11340051/327c5fecaa51/12913_2024_11423_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b868/11340051/c35678942035/12913_2024_11423_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pediatric head injury guideline use in Sweden: a cross-sectional survey on determinants for successful implementation of a clinical practice guideline.瑞典儿科头部损伤指南的使用情况:一项关于成功实施临床实践指南的决定因素的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 21;24(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11423-z.
2
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a cross-sectional survey among physicians in Estonia.实施临床实践指南的障碍和促进因素:爱沙尼亚医生的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec 13;12:455. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-455.
3
Management of paediatric traumatic brain injury in Sweden: a national cross-sectional survey.瑞典儿科创伤性脑损伤管理:一项全国性横断面调查。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 May 12;30(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01022-4.
4
Statewide cross-sectional survey of emergency departments' adoption and implementation of the Ohio opioid prescribing guidelines and opioid prescribing practices.俄亥俄州全州范围内的横断面调查,旨在了解急诊科对俄亥俄州阿片类药物处方指南的采用和实施情况,以及阿片类药物处方实践情况。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 30;8(6):e020477. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020477.
5
Emergency physicians' knowledge and attitudes of clinical decision support in the electronic health record: a survey-based study.急诊医师对电子健康记录中临床决策支持的知识和态度:一项基于调查的研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(4):352-60. doi: 10.1111/acem.12109.
6
Economic evaluation of the NET intervention versus guideline dissemination for management of mild head injury in hospital emergency departments.医院急诊部门轻度头部损伤管理中 NET 干预与指南传播的经济评估。
Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 5;13(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0834-6.
7
Emergency Department Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State in Adults: National Survey of Attitudes and Practice.成人糖尿病酮症酸中毒和高渗高血糖综合征的急诊科管理:态度和实践的全国性调查。
Can J Diabetes. 2018 Jun;42(3):229-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
8
Barriers and enablers that influence guideline-based care of geriatric fall patients presenting to the emergency department.影响老年跌倒患者就诊于急诊科时基于指南的护理的障碍和促进因素。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Dec;36(12):741-747. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208260. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
9
Impact of implementation of the national institute for health and clinical excellence (NICE) head injury guideline in a tertiary care center emergency department: A pre and post-intervention study.国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)脑外伤指南在三级护理中心急诊部实施的影响:一项干预前后研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 15;16(7):e0254754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254754. eCollection 2021.
10
Assessment of Pediatrician Awareness and Implementation of the Addendum Guidelines for the Prevention of Peanut Allergy in the United States.评估儿科医生对美国预防花生过敏附加指南的认识和实施情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010511. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10511.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of the Scandinavian guidelines for minor and moderate head trauma in children: a prospective, pragmatic, validation study.斯堪的纳维亚儿童轻度和中度头部创伤指南的诊断准确性:一项前瞻性、实用性验证研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Feb 13;51:101233. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101233. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Scandinavian guidelines for minor and moderate head trauma in children: protocol for a pragmatic, prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study.验证《斯堪的纳维亚儿童轻微和中度头部创伤指南》:一项实用、前瞻性、观察性、多中心队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 3;14(4):e078622. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078622.
2
Physician-level determinants of HCV screening during pregnancy in a U.S. sample.美国样本中医生层面决定丙型肝炎病毒筛查在孕期进行的因素。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;309(6):2491-2498. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07146-x. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
3
The epidemiology of and management of pediatric patients with head trauma: a hospital-based study from Southern Sweden.
瑞典南部医院基于案例的儿童头部创伤患者的流行病学和管理研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 9;30(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01055-9.
4
Return to Learn ECHO: Telementoring for School Personnel to Help Children Return to School and Learning After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.重返学习 ECHO:远程指导学校人员,帮助儿童在轻度创伤性脑损伤后重返学校和学习。
J Sch Health. 2022 Dec;92(12):1194-1201. doi: 10.1111/josh.13221. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
5
Qualitative study of emergency clinicians to inform a national guideline on the management of children with mild-to-moderate head injuries.针对急诊临床医生的定性研究,以制定关于轻度至中度头部受伤儿童管理的国家指南。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Mar;40(3):195-199. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-212198. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
6
Trends in guideline implementation: an updated scoping review.指南实施趋势:更新的范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jul 23;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01223-6.
7
Management of paediatric traumatic brain injury in Sweden: a national cross-sectional survey.瑞典儿科创伤性脑损伤管理:一项全国性横断面调查。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 May 12;30(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01022-4.
8
Effectiveness of the CDC HEADS UP online training on healthcare providers' mTBI knowledge and self-efficacy.美国疾病控制与预防中心 HEAD UP 在线培训对医护人员脑震荡知识和自我效能的影响。
J Safety Res. 2021 Sep;78:221-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 May 7.
9
Decision aids linked to evidence summaries and clinical practice guidelines: results from user-testing in clinical encounters.与证据总结和临床实践指南相关的决策辅助工具:临床诊疗中用户测试的结果
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 29;21(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01541-7.
10
Pediatric Emergency Medicine ECHO (Extension for Community Health Care Outcomes): Cultivating Connections to Improve Pediatric Emergency Care.儿科急诊医学ECHO(社区医疗保健成果扩展项目):建立联系以改善儿科急诊护理。
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Nov 18;5(3):e10548. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10548. eCollection 2021 Jul.