• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[多种单插管技术改善血液透析患者动静脉内瘘的结局:一项回顾性研究]

[Multiple Single Cannulation Technique Improves the Outcomes of Arteriovenous Graft in Hemodialysis Patients: A Retrospective Study].

作者信息

Wang Ruimin, Wang Siyan, Xue Xiaoling, Yue Xiaohong, Wang Xinfang, Wang Pei, Liang Xianhui

机构信息

( 450052) Blood Purification Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.

出版信息

Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jul 20;55(4):1001-1006. doi: 10.12182/20240760207.

DOI:10.12182/20240760207
PMID:39170024
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11334275/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of the multiple single cannulation technique (MUST) on the outcomes of arteriovenous graft (AVG).

METHODS

A retrospective study of AVG created between January 2018 and December 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University was conducted. The clinical data of patients and their follow-up data for venous access were analyzed. Subjects were divided into the MUST group or the non-MUST group according to whether MUST was used. The cumulative patency rate and complication incidence were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression was applied to analyze the influencing factors of applying MUST in AVG.

RESULTS

The MUST group included 115 AVG and the non-MUST group, 122 AVG. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 4-year cumulative patency rates of the MUST group were 100%, 99.1%, 95.2%, 85.4%, and 73.2%, respectively, while those for the non-MUST group were 97.5%, 92.7%, 77.7%, 69.7%, and 50.0%, respectively, with the 2-year and 3-year patency rates showing significant difference (=0.022, =0.004). The standard intervention rate expressed in (median [interquartile range]) in the MUST group was significantly lower than that in the non-MUST group (0.46 [0.00, 0.94] vs. 0.97 [0.60, 1.59], =-5.808, <0.001). A total of 24 (20.9%) AVG in the MUST group and 60 (49.2%) AVG in the non-MUST group had a standard intervention rate >1.0 per patient-year, with significant difference between the two groups. Three (2.6%) AVG in the MUST group and 7 (5.7%) AVG in the non-MUST group were complicated by aneurysm ( =20.737, P<0.001). One (0.9%) AVG in the MUST group and 6 (4.9%) AVG in the non-MUST group had graft infection, with the difference between the groups showing no significance (=0.121). Multivariate logistic regression showed that dialysis in the alliance facilities (odds ratio [OR]=2.713, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.698-4.336, <0.001], and excellent follow-up [OR=2.189, 95% CI: 1.221-3.927, =0.009] were the influencing factors of applying MUST in AVG.

CONCLUSION

MUST improves the cumulative patency of AVG and decreases the intervention frequency and the incidence of aneurysm without increasing the risk of graft infection.

摘要

目的

评估多根单通道插管技术(MUST)对动静脉移植物(AVG)使用效果的影响。

方法

对2018年1月至2021年12月在郑州大学第一附属医院建立的AVG进行回顾性研究。分析患者的临床资料及其静脉通路的随访数据。根据是否使用MUST将研究对象分为MUST组和非MUST组。比较两组的累积通畅率和并发症发生率。应用Logistic回归分析AVG中应用MUST的影响因素。

结果

MUST组有115例AVG,非MUST组有122例AVG。MUST组1年、2年、3年和4年的累积通畅率分别为100%、99.1%、95.2%、85.4%和73.2%,而非MUST组分别为97.5%、92.7%、77.7%、69.7%和50.0%,2年和3年的通畅率差异有统计学意义(P=0.022,P=0.004)。MUST组以(中位数[四分位间距])表示的标准干预率显著低于非MUST组(0.46[0.00,0.94]对0.97[0.60,1.59],P=-5.808,P<0.001)。MUST组共有24例(20.9%)AVG和非MUST组60例(49.2%)AVG的标准干预率>1.0/患者年,两组间差异有统计学意义。MUST组3例(2.6%)AVG和非MUST组7例(5.7%)AVG发生动脉瘤并发症(P=20.737,P<0.001)。MUST组1例(0.9%)AVG和非MUST组6例(4.9%)AVG发生移植物感染,两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.121)。多因素Logistic回归显示,联合设施透析(比值比[OR]=2.713,95%置信区间[CI]:1.698 - 4.336,P<0.001)和良好的随访(OR=2.189,95%CI:1.221 - 3.927,P=0.009)是AVG中应用MUST的影响因素。

结论

MUST可提高AVG的累积通畅率,降低干预频率和动脉瘤发生率,且不增加移植物感染风险。

相似文献

1
[Multiple Single Cannulation Technique Improves the Outcomes of Arteriovenous Graft in Hemodialysis Patients: A Retrospective Study].[多种单插管技术改善血液透析患者动静脉内瘘的结局:一项回顾性研究]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jul 20;55(4):1001-1006. doi: 10.12182/20240760207.
2
Prospective multicenter study with a 1-year analysis of a new vascular graft used for early cannulation in patients undergoing hemodialysis.一项前瞻性多中心研究,对一种用于接受血液透析患者早期插管的新型血管移植物进行为期1年的分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Aug;62(2):434-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.03.020. Epub 2015 May 4.
3
Assessment of Use of Arteriovenous Graft vs Arteriovenous Fistula for First-time Permanent Hemodialysis Access.评估动静脉移植物与动静脉瘘在首次永久性血液透析通路中的应用。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):844-851. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1736.
4
A comparison of brachial artery-brachial vein arteriovenous fistulas with arteriovenous grafts in patients with poor superficial venous anatomy.浅静脉解剖结构不佳患者的肱动脉-肱静脉动静脉内瘘与动静脉移植物的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;65(2):444-451. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.037. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
5
The forearm arteriovenous graft between the brachial artery and the brachial vein as a reliable dialysis vascular access for patients with inadequate superficial veins.肱动脉-贵要静脉前臂动静脉内瘘为前臂可供选择的血管通路,为那些自身浅静脉条件不好的患者提供了可靠的透析血管通路。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):199-207.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.101. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
6
Retrospective evaluation of three types of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for upper limb vascular access.回顾性评估三种用于上肢血管通路的膨体聚四氟乙烯移植物。
Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(2):2371056. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2371056. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
7
Comparison Between Transposed Brachiobasilic Fistula and Arteriovenous Graft for Upper Limb Arteriovenous Access in Patients on Hemodialysis.血液透析患者转位肱动脉-头静脉内瘘与动静脉移植物在上肢动静脉通路中的比较。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2021 Feb;55(2):164-170. doi: 10.1177/1538574420969252. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
8
Tradeoffs in Vascular Access Selection in Elderly Patients Initiating Hemodialysis With a Catheter.老年血液透析患者导管置管时血管通路选择的权衡。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Oct;72(4):509-518. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 May 18.
9
Comparison of Lower and Upper Extremity Arteriovenous Graft: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis with 5-Year Follow-Up.下肢与上肢动静脉移植物的比较:一项为期5年随访的回顾性临床分析
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Jan;98:235-243. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.06.016. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
10
[Prevalence and intervention effect of arteriovenous graft stenosis].[动静脉移植物狭窄的患病率及干预效果]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 20;104(32):3025-3031. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240202-00259.

本文引用的文献

1
Arteriovenous Access for Hemodialysis: A Review.动静脉内瘘在血液透析中的应用:综述
JAMA. 2024 Apr 16;331(15):1307-1317. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0535.
2
Infectious complications associated with buttonhole cannulation of native arteriovenous fistulas: a 22-year follow-up.自体动静脉内瘘纽扣式穿刺相关的感染并发症:一项22年的随访研究
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024 May 31;39(6):1000-1007. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfad229.
3
Comparison of puncture methods in patients with hemodialysis: A randomized controlled trial.血液透析患者穿刺方法的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Semin Dial. 2023 Nov-Dec;36(6):454-461. doi: 10.1111/sdi.13142. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
4
A randomised control trial protocol of MuST for vascular access cannulation in hemodialysis patients (MuST Study): contributions for a safe nursing intervention.MuST 用于血液透析患者血管通路置管的随机对照试验方案(MuST 研究):为安全护理干预提供的贡献。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Jun 21;23(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02842-3.
5
Patency of ePTFE Arteriovenous Graft Placements in Hemodialysis Patients: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.动静脉移植物在血液透析患者中的通畅率:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Kidney360. 2020 Oct 15;1(12):1437-1446. doi: 10.34067/KID.0003502020. eCollection 2020 Dec 31.
6
The Impact of Multidisciplinary Collaborative Nursing Intervention on Arteriovenous Fistula in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.多学科协作护理干预对血液透析患者动静脉内瘘的影响。
Clin Nurs Res. 2022 Jul;31(6):1158-1163. doi: 10.1177/10547738211037132. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
7
Multiple single cannulation technique of arteriovenous fistula: A randomized controlled trial.动静脉瘘管的多次单腔插管技术:一项随机对照试验。
Hemodial Int. 2022 Jan;26(1):4-12. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12962. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
8
New Devices and Technologies for Hemodialysis Vascular Access: A Review.新的血液透析血管通路设备和技术:综述。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Jul;78(1):116-124. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.11.027. Epub 2021 May 6.
9
Risk of Vascular Access Infection Associated With Buttonhole Cannulation of Fistulas: Data From the National Healthcare Safety Network.与瘘管扣眼穿刺相关的血管通路感染风险:来自国家医疗保健安全网络的数据。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Jul;76(1):82-89. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.11.006. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
10
Vascular access cannulation in hemodialysis patients: technical approach.血液透析患者的血管通路置管:技术方法。
J Bras Nefrol. 2020 Mar;42(1):38-46. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2019-0031. Epub 2019 Dec 9.