Mondal Debashish, Sang Shuxun, Han Sijie, Zhou Xiaozhi, Zhao Fuping, Zhang Jinchao, Gao Wei
School of Resources and Earth Sciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China.
Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources and Reservoir Formation Process of the Ministry of Education, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou, 221008, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 31;10(15):e35481. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35481. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
Guizhou Province has many multi-layer, thin-thick coal seams; however, complex geology, incomplete reservoir characterization, and sweet-spot selection technology prevent large-scale coalbed methane (CBM) development. This study evaluates the CBM reservoir properties within the Dahebian block using logging data, coal sample analysis, and well-testing data and develops a 3D static reservoir properties model to analyze their spatial and vertical propagation. A sweet spot evaluation model was established using a multi-level fuzzy method based on 9 parameters extracted from a 3D static reservoir properties model. The coal measure has 22 coal seams, and seams >2 m thick have 2 or 3 thin non-coal layers intercalated. Coal seams 1, 7, and 11 are thin to thick, deeply buried, widely distributed, and have high gas content and saturation. Undeformed and cataclastic coal predominates the coal seam 1 and 7, whereas coal seam 11 is dominated by cataclastic and granulated coal. The southern and central parts of coal seam 7 and 11 have less tectonically deformed coal (TDC). Coal seams 1 and 7 have low permeability relative to seam 11 and are localized, while coal seams 11 have high permeability, are extensively distributed, and contain substantial gas concentrations. Comparative analysis of evaluation scores and CBM production statistics shows that high scores indicate sweet spots for CBM development. Sweet-spot potential was classified as high, medium, and low. Scattered sweet spots are found in single layers, while combined development (1 + 7+11) reveals a wider high-potential area in the south-central region. This area, featuring deep, thick coal seams, high permeability, gas saturation, reservoir pressure, and low TDC proportion, indicates significant development potential. This study validates CBM development statistics, identifies future development areas, and guides the development of geologically complex Guizhou CBM.
贵州省有许多多层、薄厚不均的煤层;然而,复杂的地质条件、储层特征不完整以及甜点区选择技术阻碍了大规模煤层气(CBM)开发。本研究利用测井数据、煤样分析和试井数据评估了大河坝区块内的煤层气储层特性,并建立了三维静态储层特性模型以分析其空间和垂直分布。基于从三维静态储层特性模型中提取的9个参数,采用多级模糊方法建立了甜点区评价模型。煤系有22个煤层,厚度大于2米的煤层夹有2至3个薄的非煤层。煤层1、7和11由薄变厚,埋藏深,分布广,且瓦斯含量和饱和度高。煤层1和7以未变形和碎裂煤为主,而煤层11以碎裂煤和粒状煤为主。煤层7和11的南部和中部构造变形煤(TDC)较少。煤层1和7相对于煤层11渗透率较低且分布局限,而煤层11渗透率高、分布广泛且瓦斯浓度高。评价得分与煤层气产量统计的对比分析表明,高分表明是煤层气开发的甜点区。甜点区潜力分为高、中、低三类。单层中发现有分散的甜点区,而联合开发(1+7+11)显示中南部地区有更广阔的高潜力区域。该区域煤层深、厚,渗透率高,瓦斯饱和度高,储层压力高,TDC比例低,具有显著的开发潜力。本研究验证了煤层气开发统计数据,确定了未来开发区域,并为地质条件复杂的贵州煤层气开发提供了指导。