Panyutin I, Lyamichev V, Mirkin S
Institute of Molecular Genetics, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1985 Jun;2(6):1221-34. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1985.10507634.
We have constructed plasmids carrying d(AT)n.d(AT)n inserts of different lengths. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis patterns show that an increase in the negative superhelicity of these DNAs brings about a structural transition within the inserts, resulting in a reduction of the superhelical stress. However, this reduction corresponds to the expected values neither for cruciform nor the Z form. Those DNA topoisomers in which the structural transition had occurred proved to be specifically recognizable by single-strand-specific endonuclease S1, with the cleavage site situated at the centre of the insert. These data, as well as kinetic studies, suggest that the cloned d(AT)n.d(AT)n sequences adopt a cruciform rather than the Z-form structure. We discuss plausible reasons of the discrepancy between the observed superhelical stress release and that expected for the transition of the insert to the cruciform state.
我们构建了携带不同长度d(AT)n.d(AT)n插入片段的质粒。二维凝胶电泳图谱显示,这些DNA负超螺旋度的增加会导致插入片段内的结构转变,从而降低超螺旋应力。然而,这种降低既不符合十字形结构也不符合Z型结构的预期值。那些发生了结构转变的DNA拓扑异构体被证明能被单链特异性核酸内切酶S1特异性识别,切割位点位于插入片段的中心。这些数据以及动力学研究表明,克隆的d(AT)n.d(AT)n序列采用的是十字形结构而非Z型结构。我们讨论了观察到的超螺旋应力释放与插入片段转变为十字形状态预期的超螺旋应力释放之间存在差异的可能原因。