Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology and Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Transgenic Res. 2024 Oct;33(5):297-322. doi: 10.1007/s11248-024-00394-w. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
Mosquitoes visit flowers to obtain sugar or other nutrients and therefore possibly serve as major or minor pollinators of some plant species. They also often derive plant nutrients from other sources, such as extrafloral nectaries and honeydew. In a few cases, the plant-mosquito relationship is close, and mosquito pollination has been confirmed. Most plant species visited by mosquitoes, however, appear to depend on multiple means of pollination, particularly other flower-feeding insects. In addition, most mosquito species visit the flowers of many kinds of plants, possibly dispersing pollen in both biologically meaningful and irrelevant ways. This apparent lack of selectivity by both plants and mosquitoes liberates each of them from dependence on an unreliable pollen vehicle or nutrient source. A hypothetical pollinating role for the two top vectors of devastating human-disease pathogens, Anopheles gambiae or Aedes aegypti, relies on indirect evidence. So far, this evidence suggests that their participation in pollen transfer of native, introduced, or beneficial plants is negligible. The few plant species likely to be pollinated by these vectors are mostly invasive, harmful weeds associated with humans. That conclusion draws support from four characteristics of these vectors: (1) the numerous alternative potential pollinators of the flowers they visit; (2) their common use of diverse non-floral sources of nutrients; (3) the females' infrequent sugar feeding and heavy reliance on human blood for energy; and (4) their relatively low population densities. From these traits it follows that focused suppression or elimination of these two vectors, by whatever means, is highly unlikely to have adverse effects on pollination in endemic biotic communities or on ornamental plants or food crops.
蚊子访问花朵以获取糖或其他营养物质,因此可能是某些植物物种的主要或次要传粉者。它们也经常从其他来源获取植物营养物质,例如额外的花蜜和蜜露。在少数情况下,植物与蚊子的关系密切,并且已经证实蚊子传粉。然而,大多数被蚊子访问的植物物种似乎依赖于多种传粉方式,特别是其他吸食花朵的昆虫。此外,大多数蚊子物种访问许多种类的植物的花朵,可能以有意义和无意义的方式传播花粉。这种植物和蚊子明显缺乏选择性,使它们各自摆脱了对不可靠花粉载体或营养源的依赖。两种最具破坏性的人类疾病病原体的主要传播媒介——冈比亚按蚊或埃及伊蚊——的假设传粉作用依赖于间接证据。到目前为止,这一证据表明,它们对本地、引入或有益植物的花粉转移的参与可以忽略不计。这些媒介可能传粉的少数几种植物物种大多是与人类相关的入侵性有害杂草。这一结论得到了这些媒介的四个特征的支持:(1)它们访问的花朵有许多替代的潜在传粉者;(2)它们经常使用各种非花源的营养物质;(3)雌性蚊子很少吸食糖分,严重依赖人类血液获取能量;(4)它们的种群密度相对较低。从这些特征可以推断,通过任何手段集中抑制或消除这两种媒介,都不太可能对地方性生物群落中的传粉或观赏植物或粮食作物产生不利影响。