Nurkoç Serdar Gökhan, Yakışan Turab
Department of Cardiology, Yozgat State Hospital, Yozgat, Turkey.
Angiology. 2025 Apr;76(4):323-329. doi: 10.1177/00033197241274825. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
There is an interaction between mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet count (PC), inflammation, and platelet reactivity. The present study evaluated the relationship between the MPV/PC ratio and blood pressure (BP) using 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). A total of 720 patients (male: 291) were included in the study. Based on the ABPM outcomes, they were divided into two groups: dipper hypertensive ( = 350; male: 136) and non-dipper hypertensive ( = 370; male: 155). Peripheral venous blood samples obtained at admission were used for PC and MPV calculations. Both groups displayed identical clinical characteristics. Non-dipper hypertensives had a higher MPV/PC ratio than dipper hypertensives [0.044; (0.036-0.055); 0.036 (0.030-0.042); < .001]. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal cut-off value of the MPV/PC ratio for predicting non-dipper patterns in hypertensive patients was 0.040 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.726, < .001). Sensitivity was 64.1% and specificity was 64.3%. The MPV/PC ratio may represent mechanisms involved in increasing cardiovascular risk in non-dipper hypertensives compared with dipper hypertensives.
平均血小板体积(MPV)、血小板计数(PC)、炎症和血小板反应性之间存在相互作用。本研究使用24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)评估了MPV/PC比值与血压(BP)之间的关系。共有720例患者(男性:291例)纳入本研究。根据ABPM结果,将他们分为两组:勺型高血压患者(=350;男性:136例)和非勺型高血压患者(=370;男性:155例)。入院时采集的外周静脉血样本用于计算PC和MPV。两组具有相同的临床特征。非勺型高血压患者的MPV/PC比值高于勺型高血压患者[0.044;(0.036 - 0.055);0.036(0.030 - 0.042);P <.001]。根据受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,预测高血压患者非勺型模式的MPV/PC比值的最佳截断值为0.040(曲线下面积[AUC]:0.726,P <.001)。敏感性为64.1%,特异性为64.3%。与勺型高血压患者相比,MPV/PC比值可能代表了非勺型高血压患者心血管风险增加所涉及的机制。