Ha Joon, Kim Joon Young, Springer Max, Chhabra Aaryan, Chung Stephanie T, Sumner Anne E, Sherman Arthur S, Arslanian Silva
Department of Mathematics, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059, USA.
Department of Exercise Science, David B. Falk College of Sport and Human Dynamics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Feb 18;110(3):706-714. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae582.
The gold-standard clamp measurements for insulin sensitivity (cSI), β-cell function (cBCF), and disposition index (cDI = cSI × cBCF) are not practical in large-scale studies.
We sought to 1) validate a mathematical model-derived DI from oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) with insulin (mDI) and without (mDI-woI) against cDI and oral disposition index (oDI) and 2) evaluate the ability of the novel indices to detect prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D).
We carried out a secondary analysis of previously reported cross-sectional observational studies. The Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion mathematical model for glucose-insulin dynamics was applied to 5-point and 3-point OGTTs synchronized with hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps from 130 youth with obesity (68 normal glucose tolerance [NGT], 33 impaired glucose tolerance [IGT], 29 T2D).
Model-derived DI correlated well with clamp DI (R = 0.76 [logged]). Between NGT and IGT, mDI and mDI-woI decreased more than oDI and cDI, (60% and 59% vs 29% and 27%), and by receiver operating characteristic analysis were superior at detecting IGT compared with oDI and cDI (area under the curve [AUC] 0.88-0.87 vs 0.68-0.65), as was mean glucose (AUC 0.87).
mDI-woI is better than oDI or the labor-intensive cDI for detecting dysglycemia in obese youth. Bypassing insulin measurements with mDI-woI from the OGTT provides a cost-effective approach for large-scale epidemiological studies of dysglycemia in youth.
胰岛素敏感性(cSI)、β细胞功能(cBCF)和处置指数(cDI = cSI×cBCF)的金标准钳夹测量在大规模研究中并不实用。
我们旨在1)验证从口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)中得出的数学模型衍生的处置指数,有胰岛素时(mDI)和无胰岛素时(mDI-woI)与cDI和口服处置指数(oDI)的相关性,以及2)评估这些新指数检测糖尿病前期和2型糖尿病(T2D)的能力。
我们对先前报道的横断面观察性研究进行了二次分析。将葡萄糖-胰岛素动力学的胰岛素敏感性和分泌数学模型应用于来自130名肥胖青年(68例糖耐量正常[NGT],33例糖耐量受损[IGT],29例T2D)的5点和3点OGTT,这些OGTT与高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹和高血糖钳夹同步。
模型衍生的处置指数与钳夹处置指数相关性良好(R = 0.76[对数化])。在NGT和IGT之间,mDI和mDI-woI的下降幅度大于oDI和cDI(分别为60%和59%,而oDI和cDI分别为29%和27%),并且通过受试者工作特征分析,与oDI和cDI相比,mDI和mDI-woI在检测IGT方面更具优势(曲线下面积[AUC]为0.88 - 0.87,而oDI和cDI为0.68 - 0.65),平均血糖也是如此(AUC为0.87)。
在检测肥胖青年的血糖异常方面,mDI-woI优于oDI或劳动强度大的cDI。通过OGTT的mDI-woI绕过胰岛素测量为青年血糖异常的大规模流行病学研究提供了一种经济有效的方法。