Sgayer Inshirah, Elafawi Mohamed, Braude Olga, Abramov Sarah, Lowenstein Lior, Odeh Marwan
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariyya, Israel.
Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2025;52(1):59-64. doi: 10.1159/000541008. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
Limited evidence exists on borderline oligohydramnios. Our objective was to determine perinatal outcomes in uncomplicated term pregnancies with borderline oligohydramnios.
This retrospective analysis compared adverse perinatal outcomes among pregnancies during 2018-2022, between those with borderline oligohydramnios defined as amniotic fluid index (AFI) of 5.1-8.0 cm, those with oligohydramnios (AFI ≤5 cm), and those with normal AFI (8.1-25 cm). The latter matched one-to-one to the borderline oligohydramnios group and served as the control group. The outcomes compared included birthweight, cesarean delivery due to fetal distress, the presence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, Apgar scores, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and the occurrence of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates.
During the study period, 140 women had borderline oligohydramnios and 345 had oligohydramnios; the control group included 140 women. Borderline oligohydramnios was associated with increased rates of delivering SGA neonates (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-11.6, p = 0.034) and cesarean delivery due to fetal distress (aOR = 3.0, 95% CI 1.1-8.3, p = 0.032). Rates of composite neonatal outcome (including at least one of the following: cesarean delivery due to fetal distress, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, 5-min Apgar score <7, umbilical artery pH <7.15, or neonatal intensive care unit admission) were higher in both the borderline oligohydramnios (20.7%) and oligohydramnios (18.6%) groups compared to the control group (9.3%) (p = 0.019).
Pregnancies with borderline oligohydramnios were associated with increased risks of delivering SGA neonates and requiring cesarean delivery due to fetal distress. These findings support considering closer antepartum surveillance for these pregnancies, especially for identifying abnormal fetal growth.
Limited evidence exists on borderline oligohydramnios. Our objective was to determine perinatal outcomes in uncomplicated term pregnancies with borderline oligohydramnios.
This retrospective analysis compared adverse perinatal outcomes among pregnancies during 2018-2022, between those with borderline oligohydramnios defined as amniotic fluid index (AFI) of 5.1-8.0 cm, those with oligohydramnios (AFI ≤5 cm), and those with normal AFI (8.1-25 cm). The latter matched one-to-one to the borderline oligohydramnios group and served as the control group. The outcomes compared included birthweight, cesarean delivery due to fetal distress, the presence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, Apgar scores, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and the occurrence of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates.
During the study period, 140 women had borderline oligohydramnios and 345 had oligohydramnios; the control group included 140 women. Borderline oligohydramnios was associated with increased rates of delivering SGA neonates (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-11.6, p = 0.034) and cesarean delivery due to fetal distress (aOR = 3.0, 95% CI 1.1-8.3, p = 0.032). Rates of composite neonatal outcome (including at least one of the following: cesarean delivery due to fetal distress, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, 5-min Apgar score <7, umbilical artery pH <7.15, or neonatal intensive care unit admission) were higher in both the borderline oligohydramnios (20.7%) and oligohydramnios (18.6%) groups compared to the control group (9.3%) (p = 0.019).
Pregnancies with borderline oligohydramnios were associated with increased risks of delivering SGA neonates and requiring cesarean delivery due to fetal distress. These findings support considering closer antepartum surveillance for these pregnancies, especially for identifying abnormal fetal growth.
关于边缘性羊水过少的证据有限。我们的目的是确定无并发症的足月妊娠合并边缘性羊水过少的围产期结局。
这项回顾性分析比较了2018 - 2022年期间妊娠的不良围产期结局,比较对象为羊水指数(AFI)为5.1 - 8.0 cm的边缘性羊水过少孕妇、羊水过少(AFI≤5 cm)孕妇以及AFI正常(8.1 - 25 cm)的孕妇。后者与边缘性羊水过少组一对一匹配,作为对照组。比较的结局包括出生体重、因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产、羊水粪染、阿氏评分、新生儿重症监护病房入院情况以及小于胎龄(SGA)新生儿的发生率。
在研究期间,140名妇女为边缘性羊水过少,345名妇女为羊水过少;对照组包括140名妇女。边缘性羊水过少与分娩SGA新生儿的发生率增加相关(调整优势比[aOR]=3.6,95%置信区间[CI]1.1 - 11.6,p = 0.034)以及因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产相关(aOR = 3.0,95%CI 1.1 - 8.3,p = 0.032)。边缘性羊水过少组(20.7%)和羊水过少组(18.6%)的复合新生儿结局(包括以下至少一项:因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产、羊水粪染、5分钟阿氏评分<7、脐动脉pH<7.15或新生儿重症监护病房入院)发生率均高于对照组(9.3%)(p = 0.019)。
边缘性羊水过少的妊娠与分娩SGA新生儿以及因胎儿窘迫需要行剖宫产的风险增加相关。这些发现支持对这些妊娠进行更密切的产前监测,尤其是用于识别胎儿生长异常情况。
关于边缘性羊水过少的证据有限。我们的目的是确定无并发症的足月妊娠合并边缘性羊水过少的围产期结局。
这项回顾性分析比较了2018 - 2022年期间妊娠的不良围产期结局,比较对象为羊水指数(AFI)为5.1 - 8.0 cm的边缘性羊水过少孕妇、羊水过少(AFI≤5 cm)孕妇以及AFI正常(8.1 - 25 cm)的孕妇。后者与边缘性羊水过少组一对一匹配,作为对照组。比较的结局包括出生体重、因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产、羊水粪染、阿氏评分、新生儿重症监护病房入院情况以及小于胎龄(SGA)新生儿的发生率。
在研究期间,140名妇女为边缘性羊水过少,345名妇女为羊水过少;对照组包括140名妇女。边缘性羊水过少与分娩SGA新生儿的发生率增加相关(调整优势比[aOR]=3.6,95%置信区间[CI]1.1 - 11.6,p = 0.034)以及因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产相关(aOR = 3.0,95%CI 1.1 - 8.3,p = 0.032)。边缘性羊水过少组(20.7%)和羊水过少组(18.6%)的复合新生儿结局(包括以下至少一项:因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产、羊水粪染、5分钟阿氏评分<7、脐动脉pH<7.15或新生儿重症监护病房入院)发生率均高于对照组(9.3%)(p = 0.019)。
边缘性羊水过少的妊娠与分娩SGA新生儿以及因胎儿窘迫需要行剖宫产的风险增加相关。这些发现支持对这些妊娠进行更密切的产前监测,尤其是用于识别胎儿生长异常情况。