Suppr超能文献

哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与碳青霉烯类药物治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌血流感染住院患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Piperacillin-tazobactam vs. carbapenems for treating hospitalized patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Gatti Milo, Cojutti Pier Giorgio, Pea Federico

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Clinical Pharmacology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Clinical Pharmacology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Dec;39:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2024.08.002. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To meta-analyse the clinical efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam vs. carbapenems for treating hospitalized patients affected by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections (BSIs).

METHODS

Two authors independently searched PubMed-MEDLINE and Scopus database up to January 17, 2024, to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies comparing piperacillin-tazobactam vs. carbapenems for the management of hospitalized patients with ESBL-BSIs. Data were independently extracted by the two authors, and the quality of included studies was independently assessed according to ROB 2.0 or ROBINS-I tools. Mortality rate was selected as primary outcome. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling odds ratios (ORs) retrieved from studies providing adjustment for confounders using a random-effects model with the inverse variance method.

RESULTS

After screening 3,418 articles, 10 studies were meta-analysed (one RCT and nine retrospective observational studies; N = 1,962). Mortality rate did not significantly differ between treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam vs. carbapenems (N = 6; OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 0.96-2.07; I² = 23.6%). The findings were consistent also in subgroup analyses assessing patients receiving empirical therapy (N = 5; OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.99-1.85), or patients having in ≥50% of cases urinary/biliary tract as the primary BSI source (N = 2; OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.84-1.89). Conversely, the mortality rate was significantly higher with piperacillin-tazobactam only among patients having in <50% of cases urinary/biliary tract as the primary source of BSI (N = 3; OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.00-4.07).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that, after performing appropriate adjustments for confounders, mortality and clinical outcome in patients having ESBL-producing Enterobacterales BSIs did not significantly differ among those receiving piperacillin-tazobactam compared to those receiving carbapenems.

摘要

目的

对哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与碳青霉烯类药物治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)肠杆菌科血流感染(BSI)住院患者的临床疗效进行荟萃分析。

方法

两位作者独立检索截至2024年1月17日的PubMed-MEDLINE和Scopus数据库,以检索比较哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与碳青霉烯类药物治疗产ESBL-BSI住院患者的随机对照试验(RCT)或观察性研究。数据由两位作者独立提取,并根据ROB 2.0或ROBINS-I工具独立评估纳入研究的质量。选择死亡率作为主要结局。采用随机效应模型和逆方差法,通过汇总对混杂因素进行调整的研究中获得的比值比(OR)进行荟萃分析。

结果

在筛选3418篇文章后,对10项研究进行了荟萃分析(1项RCT和9项回顾性观察性研究;N = 1962)。哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗与碳青霉烯类药物治疗的死亡率无显著差异(N = 6;OR:1.41;95%CI:0.96 - 2.07;I² = 23.6%)。在评估接受经验性治疗的患者(N = 5;OR:1.36;95%CI:0.99 - 1.85)或主要BSI来源为尿路/胆道且病例数≥50%的患者(N = 2;OR:1.26;95%CI:0.84 - 1.89)的亚组分析中,结果也一致。相反,仅在主要BSI来源为尿路/胆道且病例数<50%的患者中,哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗的死亡率显著更高(N = 3;OR:2.02;95%CI:1.00 - 4.07)。

结论

这项荟萃分析表明,在对混杂因素进行适当调整后,产ESBL肠杆菌科BSI患者中,接受哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗的患者与接受碳青霉烯类药物治疗的患者相比,死亡率和临床结局无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验