Bawankar Neha S, Agrawal Gopal N, Zodpey Shrikhande Sunanda S
Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College and Hospital, 440003, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2024 Sep-Oct;51:100707. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100707. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has classified methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) as a serious public health threat. The escalating minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of standard anti-methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) drugs within the susceptible range, known as "MIC creep," jeopardizes their effectiveness against MRSA infections, posing additional challenges in managing MRSA infections. This cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Central India to assess the susceptibility trends of clinical MRSA isolates against commonly used anti-MRSA drugs and to observe MIC creep, if any, over three years (2020-2022).
The study included 158 non-repetitive clinical MRSA isolates. The MICs of vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid were determined in MRSA strains using agar dilution, while the MIC of daptomycin was performed by broth microdilution. MIC creep was assessed by calculating MIC50, MIC90, Modal MIC, G-mean MIC, and susceptible and resistant percentages for the fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022.
Of the 158 MRSA isolates, none were resistant to vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin, but two showed resistance to linezolid (LRSA). However, fifteen isolates showed intermediate resistance to vancomycin (VISA), and five showed intermediate resistance to teicoplanin (TISA). MIC of these anti-MRSA drugs increased in 2021 and 2022 compared to 2020. G-mean MIC for vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid in MRSA strains increased significantly over the study period, while daptomycin MIC remained relatively stable, with a slight increase in 2021 and 2022. There was a high resistance rate for clindamycin, doxycycline, and chloramphenicol among VISA, TISA, and LRSA isolates compared to MRSA.
During the three years of the study, "MIC creep" was observed in vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid and, to some extent, for daptomycin in MRSA strains. The recovery of VISA, TISA, and linezolid-resistant MRSAs is worrisome, suggesting possible MRSA treatment failure and being a forerunner of resistant strains.
美国疾病控制与预防中心已将耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)列为严重的公共卫生威胁。标准抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)药物在敏感范围内的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)不断上升,即所谓的“MIC漂移”,危及它们对MRSA感染的有效性,给MRSA感染的管理带来了额外挑战。本横断面研究在印度中部的一家三级医院进行,以评估临床MRSA分离株对常用抗MRSA药物的敏感性趋势,并观察三年(2020 - 2022年)内是否存在MIC漂移。
该研究纳入了158株非重复临床MRSA分离株。采用琼脂稀释法测定MRSA菌株中万古霉素、替考拉宁和利奈唑胺的MIC,而达托霉素的MIC通过肉汤微量稀释法测定。通过计算2020年、2021年和2022财年的MIC50、MIC90、模态MIC、几何平均MIC以及敏感和耐药百分比来评估MIC漂移。
在158株MRSA分离株中,没有一株对万古霉素、替考拉宁和达托霉素耐药,但有两株对利奈唑胺耐药(LRSA)。然而,有15株对万古霉素表现出中介耐药(VISA),5株对替考拉宁表现出中介耐药(TISA)。与2020年相比,这些抗MRSA药物的MIC在2021年和2022年有所增加。在研究期间,MRSA菌株中万古霉素、替考拉宁和利奈唑胺 的几何平均MIC显著增加,而达托霉素的MIC保持相对稳定,在2021年和2022年略有增加。与MRSA相比,VISA、TISA和LRSA分离株中克林霉素、多西环素和氯霉素的耐药率较高。
在研究的三年中,在MRSA菌株中观察到万古霉素、替考拉宁和利奈唑胺存在“MIC漂移”,达托霉素在一定程度上也存在。VISA、TISA和耐利奈唑胺MRSA的出现令人担忧,提示可能出现MRSA治疗失败,并成为耐药菌株的先兆。