Twelve-Month Sustainment of IPV Screening and Response Programs in Primary Care: Contextual Factors Impacting Implementation Success.

PURPOSE

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) employed implementation facilitation (IF) as a strategy to boost uptake of intimate partner violence (IPV) screening programs in primary care. This study examined the sustainment of screening uptake 1 year after IF and identified factors impacting sustainment success.

METHODS

A mixed-methods evaluation using quantitative and qualitative data was conducted. IPV screening rates from the conclusion of the IF period (i.e., initial adoption) through the 1-year sustainment period served as the primary outcome. We categorized sites into four groups of screening adoption and sustainment success (high adoption and high sustainment, moderate adoption and moderate sustainment, low adoption and low sustainment, and no adoption and/or no sustainment). Qualitative analysis of key informant interviews was used to identify contextual factors affecting screening 12 months post-IF. A mixed sustainment analysis matrix integrated quantitative and qualitative findings and enabled the identification of cross-site patterns.

MAIN FINDINGS

Seven of the nine sites sustained IPV screening at the most basic level (saw static or increased screening rates). High adopting and high sustaining sites (n = 3) were marked by consistently supportive medical center leadership, ongoing training for clinicians, clear protocols for responding to positive screens, and robust referral options for women experiencing IPV. Nonsustaining sites (n = 2) were marked by a host of barriers including staffing shortages, competing priorities, and inconsistent messaging from leadership regarding the importance of IPV screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowing barriers and facilitators to successful IPV screening sustainment can inform health care systems to tailor IF and other implementation strategies to sustain IPV screening in primary care. Sustainment of IPV screening requires attention to a combination of facilitators (e.g., consistent leadership support and robust referral options) as well as addressing key barriers (e.g., staff turnover and competing priorities).