• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究人工智能在预测感知发声障碍程度中的作用。

Investigating the role of artificial intelligence in predicting perceived dysphonia level.

机构信息

Independent Researcher in Laryngology, Voice Pathology, and Speech-Language Pathology, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Enghelab Avenue, Pitch-e-Shemiran, Tehran, 11489, Iran.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;281(11):6093-6097. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08868-7. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-08868-7
PMID:39174679
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the role of one of these models in the field of voice pathology and compare its performance in distinguishing the perceived dysphonia level.

METHODS

Demographic information, voice self-assessments, and acoustic measurements related to a sample of 50 adult dysphonic outpatients were presented to ChatGPT and Perplexity AI chatbots, which were interrogated for the perceived dysphonia level.

RESULTS

The agreement between the auditory-perceptual assessment by experts and ChatGPT and Perplexity AI chatbots, as determined by Cohen's Kappa, was not statistically significant (p = 0.429). There was also a low positive correlation (r = 0.30, p = 0.03) between the diagnosis made by ChatGPT and Perplexity AI chatbots (r = 0.30, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

It seems that AI could not play a vital role in helping the voice care teams determine the perceptual level of dysphonia.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨这些模型在语音病理学领域中的作用,并比较它们在区分感知性嗓音障碍程度方面的表现。

方法

向 ChatGPT 和 Perplexity AI 聊天机器人呈现了 50 名成年嗓音障碍门诊患者的人口统计学信息、嗓音自我评估和声学测量结果,以询问其感知性嗓音障碍程度。

结果

通过 Cohen's Kappa 检验,专家的听觉感知评估与 ChatGPT 和 Perplexity AI 聊天机器人之间的一致性没有统计学意义(p=0.429)。ChatGPT 和 Perplexity AI 聊天机器人的诊断之间也存在低度正相关(r=0.30,p=0.03)。

结论

人工智能似乎不能在帮助嗓音保健团队确定感知性嗓音障碍程度方面发挥重要作用。

相似文献

1
Investigating the role of artificial intelligence in predicting perceived dysphonia level.研究人工智能在预测感知发声障碍程度中的作用。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;281(11):6093-6097. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08868-7. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
2
Assessment of readability, reliability, and quality of ChatGPT®, BARD®, Gemini®, Copilot®, Perplexity® responses on palliative care.评估 ChatGPT®、BARD®、 Gemini®、Copilot®、Perplexity® 在姑息治疗方面的可读性、可靠性和质量。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 16;103(33):e39305. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039305.
3
Charting new AI education in gastroenterology: Cross-sectional evaluation of ChatGPT and perplexity AI in medical residency exam.绘制胃肠病学新的人工智能教育图表:ChatGPT 和 perplexity AI 在医学住院医师考试中的横断面评估。
Dig Liver Dis. 2024 Aug;56(8):1304-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
4
Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders.巴西有嗓音障碍和无嗓音障碍人群中,嗓音障碍严重程度指数(DSI)、嗓音的共识听觉-感知评估(CAPE-V)与性别的相关性。
J Voice. 2016 Nov;30(6):765.e7-765.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.013. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
5
Immediate Effects of the Semi-Occluded Ventilation Mask on Subjects Diagnosed With Functional Dysphonia and Subjects With Normal Voices.半封闭通气面罩对功能性发音障碍患者和正常嗓音患者的即时影响。
J Voice. 2020 May;34(3):398-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
6
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.立陶宛语声学语音质量指数的验证。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):257.e1-257.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
7
Accuracy and Readability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Vasectomy-Related Questions: Public Beware.人工智能聊天机器人对输精管切除术相关问题回答的准确性和可读性:公众需谨慎。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 28;16(8):e67996. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67996. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.基于倒谱和谱的语音连续语音分析的预测价值和判别能力。
J Voice. 2013 Jul;27(4):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 May 16.
9
Correlation between Voice and Auditory Processing.语音与听觉处理之间的相关性。
J Voice. 2018 Nov;32(6):771.e25-771.e36. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
10
Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.测量韩语语音发声障碍严重程度的听觉感知和声学方法
J Voice. 2016 Sep;30(5):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of research methodology generation by large language models in laryngology: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4.0 and Gemini 1.5 flash.大语言模型在喉科学中生成研究方法的评估:ChatGPT-4.0与Gemini 1.5闪速版的比较分析
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Sep 18. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09656-7.
2
Feasibility of improving vocal fold pathology image classification with synthetic images generated by DDPM-based GenAI: a pilot study.基于DDPM的生成式人工智能生成的合成图像改善声带病理图像分类的可行性:一项初步研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09443-4.
3
Bibliometric analysis of the Top 1000 most-cited articles in otolaryngology over the past decade: global research trends and hotspots.
过去十年耳鼻喉科领域被引用次数最多的1000篇文章的文献计量分析:全球研究趋势与热点
Front Surg. 2025 Feb 17;12:1552102. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1552102. eCollection 2025.