Department of Food Engineering, Engineering Faculty, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey.
J Food Sci. 2024 Oct;89(10):6494-6506. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17302. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
This research aimed to assess the hot air-assisted radio frequency drying (HA-RFD) of orange slices to evaluate the possibility of producing high-quality dried orange slices and overcome the problem of the long drying time and the high energy consumption. The effect of electrode distance (60, 70, and 80 mm) and number of slices (1-3 slices; 4 mm thickness per slice) on the HA-RFD of orange slices was evaluated. Orange slices in three layers with a total thickness of 12 mm and an electrode gap of 70 mm were picked to dry the orange slices in the shortest time. The quality of orange slices dried with HA-RFD was compared with those of HA-dried (HAD) and freeze-dried (FD) samples. HA-RFD allowed a 67% decrease in the time of drying of the orange slices (from 1170 to 390 min) when compared to HAD. Total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), antioxidant activity, and color values were affected by the drying technique. HA-RFD showed higher TPC, TFC, and antioxidant activity than HAD. The FD samples showed the highest TPC (928 mg GAE/100 g dw), TFC (200 mg rutin/100 g dw), and antioxidant activity (67.58%). Moreover, the samples dried with HA-RFD resulted in the least color change in comparison to HAD and FD samples. Regarding vitamin C, FD samples were the best, followed by HA-RFD and HAD, respectively. Considering the final product quality, and the characteristics of drying techniques, especially drying time and drying rate, HA-RFD proved to be an alternative technique to the HAD for producing dried orange slices. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: HA-RFD was applied for the first time as an alternative technology to dry orange slices. The quality of orange samples dried by HA-RFD was compared with samples that dried by HAD and FD. The results indicated that the HA-RFD technique is a good method to dry orange slices by considering the drying characteristics and the final product quality.
本研究旨在评估热空气辅助射频干燥(HA-RFD)对橙片的干燥效果,以评估生产高质量干橙片的可能性,并克服干燥时间长和能耗高的问题。评估了电极距离(60、70 和 80 毫米)和切片数量(1-3 片;每片 4 毫米厚)对橙片 HA-RFD 的影响。选择总厚度为 12 毫米、电极间隙为 70 毫米的三层橙片进行干燥,以在最短的时间内干燥橙片。HA-RFD 干燥的橙片的质量与 HA 干燥(HAD)和冷冻干燥(FD)样品进行了比较。与 HAD 相比,HA-RFD 可将橙片的干燥时间缩短 67%(从 1170 分钟缩短至 390 分钟)。总酚含量(TPC)、总黄酮含量(TFC)、抗氧化活性和颜色值均受干燥技术的影响。HA-RFD 显示出比 HAD 更高的 TPC、TFC 和抗氧化活性。FD 样品的 TPC(928mgGAE/100gdw)、TFC(200mg芦丁/100gdw)和抗氧化活性(67.58%)最高。此外,与 HAD 和 FD 样品相比,HA-RFD 干燥的样品颜色变化最小。就维生素 C 而言,FD 样品最好,其次是 HA-RFD 和 HAD。考虑到最终产品质量以及干燥技术的特点,尤其是干燥时间和干燥速率,HA-RFD 被证明是 HAD 生产干橙片的替代技术。实际应用:HA-RFD 首次被应用于替代 HAD 技术来干燥橙片。比较了 HA-RFD 干燥和 HAD、FD 干燥的橙片样品的质量。结果表明,考虑到干燥特性和最终产品质量,HA-RFD 技术是一种很好的干燥橙片的方法。