Suppr超能文献

社会剥夺指数与家庭透析技术失败的关联:单中心经验

Association of Social Deprivation Index with Home Dialysis Technique Failure: A Single-Center Experience.

作者信息

Weissberg Justin, Liu Catherine, Phan TramAnh, Liebman Scott, Reddy Sai Subhodhini, Moore Catherine A

机构信息

University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.

出版信息

Kidney360. 2024 Nov 1;5(11):1644-1651. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000557. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

Abstract

KEY POINTS

Historically underrepresented racial groups and those with high sociodemographic stress are less likely to initiate dialysis with a home modality. Differences in race are not significant in those who transition to a home dialysis modality after starting in-center hemodialysis. Measures of sociodemographic stress are not associated with home dialysis technique failure.

BACKGROUND

Despite offering several advantages to patients and health care systems, utilization of home dialysis modalities (HDMs) remains low, particularly among racial and ethnic minorities and those with increased sociodemographic stress. Providers' apprehension toward adverse outcomes and home dialysis failure remains a barrier to HDM referral. We investigated the relationship that sociodemographic factors have on HDM use and technique failure.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with incident ESKD over a 6-year period at the University of Rochester to evaluate the association between demographic factors, the Social Deprivation Index (SDI), and comorbidity burden on HDM utilization and technique failure. Person-time incidence rates were calculated to compare outcome variables, and rates were compared using a Poisson Rate Ratio Test. A univariate Cox regression was used to examine predictors affecting technique failure.

RESULTS

Of the 873 patients, 102 started dialysis with HDM, 79 patients converted to HDM, and 692 remained on in-center hemodialysis (ICHD). Age, race, and SDI scores were significantly different between patients starting on ICHD, peritoneal dialysis, and home hemodialysis with no significant difference in comorbidity burden. Black patients represented 32% of the overall cohort, but only 16% of the initial home dialysis population. Compared with those who remained on ICHD, individuals converting from ICHD to HDM were younger and had significantly different SDI scores. SDI was not associated with HDM technique failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Historically underrepresented racial populations are less represented in those starting home dialysis; however, there was no racial difference in the group transitioning to HDM after initiating ICHD. Social deprivation scores were higher in those on ICHD compared with peritoneal dialysis. Neither social deprivation nor race predicted success on home therapy. These findings demonstrate a disparity in initial modality, and a disconnect between sociodemographic factors associated with home dialysis use and those predicting HDM technique failure.

摘要

关键点

历史上代表性不足的种族群体以及社会人口统计学压力高的群体采用家庭透析方式开始透析的可能性较小。在中心血液透析开始后转为家庭透析方式的患者中,种族差异不显著。社会人口统计学压力指标与家庭透析技术失败无关。

背景

尽管家庭透析方式(HDM)对患者和医疗保健系统有诸多优势,但其利用率仍然较低,尤其是在少数族裔和社会人口统计学压力增加的人群中。医疗服务提供者对不良后果和家庭透析失败的担忧仍然是家庭透析转诊的障碍。我们研究了社会人口统计学因素与家庭透析使用和技术失败之间的关系。

方法

我们对罗切斯特大学6年间新诊断为终末期肾病(ESKD)的成年患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以评估人口统计学因素、社会剥夺指数(SDI)和合并症负担与家庭透析使用和技术失败之间的关联。计算人时发病率以比较结局变量,并使用泊松率比检验比较发病率。使用单变量Cox回归来检查影响技术失败的预测因素。

结果

在873例患者中,102例以家庭透析方式开始透析,79例患者转为家庭透析,692例仍接受中心血液透析(ICHD)。开始接受ICHD、腹膜透析和家庭血液透析的患者在年龄、种族和SDI评分上有显著差异,但合并症负担无显著差异。黑人患者占整个队列的32%,但仅占初始家庭透析人群的16%。与仍接受ICHD的患者相比,从ICHD转为家庭透析患者更年轻,且SDI评分有显著差异。SDI与家庭透析技术失败无关。

结论

历史上代表性不足的种族群体在开始家庭透析的人群中所占比例较低;然而,在开始ICHD后转为家庭透析的人群中没有种族差异。与腹膜透析相比,接受ICHD的患者社会剥夺评分更高。社会剥夺和种族都不能预测家庭治疗的成功。这些发现表明在初始透析方式上存在差异,以及与家庭透析使用相关的社会人口统计学因素和预测家庭透析技术失败的因素之间存在脱节。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0685/12282612/e4e2009f19fe/kidney360-5-1644-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验