• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用数据质量框架分析研究计划电子健康记录中的导管原位癌数据。

Application of a Data Quality Framework to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Electronic Health Record Data From the Research Program.

机构信息

National Institutes of Health, All of Us Research Program, Bethesda, MD.

Leidos, Frederick, MD.

出版信息

JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Aug;8:e2400052. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00052.

DOI:10.1200/CCI.24.00052
PMID:39178364
Abstract

PURPOSE

The specific aims of this paper are to (1) develop and operationalize an electronic health record (EHR) data quality framework, (2) apply the dimensions of the framework to the phenotype and treatment pathways of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using Research Program data, and (3) propose and apply a checklist to evaluate the application of the framework.

METHODS

We developed a framework of five data quality dimensions (DQD; completeness, concordance, conformance, plausibility, and temporality). Participants signed a consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act authorization to share EHR data and responded to demographic questions in the Basics questionnaire. We evaluated the internal characteristics of the data and compared data with external benchmarks with descriptive and inferential statistics. We developed a DQD checklist to evaluate concept selection, internal verification, and external validity for each DQD. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP CDM) concept ID codes for DCIS were used to select a cohort of 2,209 females 18 years and older.

RESULTS

Using the proposed DQD checklist criteria, (1) concepts were selected and internally verified for conformance; (2) concepts were selected and internally verified for completeness; (3) concepts were selected, internally verified, and externally validated for concordance; (4) concepts were selected, internally verified, and externally validated for plausibility; and (5) concepts were selected, internally verified, and externally validated for temporality.

CONCLUSION

This assessment and evaluation provided insights into data quality for the DCIS phenotype using EHR data from the Research Program. The review demonstrates that salient clinical measures can be selected, applied, and operationalized within a conceptual framework and evaluated for fitness for use by applying a proposed checklist.

摘要

目的

本文的具体目的是:(1) 开发和操作电子健康记录 (EHR) 数据质量框架,(2) 使用研究计划数据将框架的维度应用于导管原位癌 (DCIS) 的表型和治疗途径,(3) 提出并应用清单来评估框架的应用。

方法

我们开发了一个由五个数据质量维度 (DQD; 完整性、一致性、一致性、合理性和时效性) 组成的框架。参与者签署了同意书和健康保险流通与责任法案授权书,以共享 EHR 数据,并在基础知识问卷中回答了人口统计问题。我们评估了数据的内部特征,并使用描述性和推断性统计数据将数据与外部基准进行了比较。我们开发了一个 DQD 清单,用于评估每个 DQD 的概念选择、内部验证和外部有效性。使用观察性医疗结局伙伴关系通用数据模型 (OMOP CDM) 的 DCIS 概念 ID 代码选择了 2209 名 18 岁及以上的女性队列。

结果

使用提出的 DQD 清单标准,(1) 为一致性选择和内部验证了概念;(2) 为完整性选择和内部验证了概念;(3) 为一致性选择、内部验证和外部验证了概念;(4) 为合理性选择、内部验证和外部验证了概念;(5) 为时效性选择、内部验证和外部验证了概念。

结论

本评估和评估使用研究计划的 EHR 数据为 DCIS 表型提供了数据质量的见解。该审查表明,可以在概念框架内选择、应用和操作重要的临床措施,并通过应用拟议的清单评估其适用性。

相似文献

1
Application of a Data Quality Framework to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Electronic Health Record Data From the Research Program.应用数据质量框架分析研究计划电子健康记录中的导管原位癌数据。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Aug;8:e2400052. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00052.
2
Ductal carcinoma in situ: trends in treatment over time in the US.导管原位癌:美国随时间变化的治疗趋势。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 May;127(1):251-7. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1198-z. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
3
Modeling the natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ based on population data.基于人群数据对导管原位癌自然史进行建模。
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 May 27;22(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01287-6.
4
Association of a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Death From Breast Cancer.导管原位癌诊断与乳腺癌死亡的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2017124. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17124.
5
Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes.乳腺导管原位癌:发病率、治疗和结局的系统评价。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):170-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp482. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
6
Finding the balance between over- and under-treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).找到导管原位癌(DCIS)过度治疗与治疗不足之间的平衡。
Breast. 2017 Feb;31:274-283. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
7
Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.乳腺导管原位癌的治疗趋势
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Mar 17;96(6):443-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh069.
8
Risk of invasive breast carcinoma among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ, 1988-2001.1988 - 2001年原位导管癌和原位小叶癌女性患者发生浸润性乳腺癌的风险
Cancer. 2006 May 15;106(10):2104-12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21864.
9
A validation of DCIS registration in a population-based breast cancer quality register and a study of treatment and prognosis for DCIS during 20 years.基于人群的乳腺癌质量登记中导管原位癌(DCIS)登记的验证以及20年间DCIS的治疗与预后研究。
Acta Oncol. 2016 Nov;55(11):1338-1343. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1211317. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
10
Incidence and treatments of DCIS in octogenarians: grade matters.八旬老人导管原位癌的发病率及治疗:分级至关重要。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Sep;165(2):403-409. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4330-5. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Data Quality Dimensions of Surgical Oncology Cohorts in the Research Program.评估研究项目中外科肿瘤学队列的数据质量维度。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Jul;9:e2500078. doi: 10.1200/CCI-25-00078. Epub 2025 Jul 8.
2
Assessing the Data Quality Dimensions of Partial and Complete Mastectomy Cohorts in the Research Program: Cross-Sectional Study.评估研究项目中部分乳房切除术和全乳房切除术队列的数据质量维度:横断面研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 11;11:e59298. doi: 10.2196/59298.