Suppr超能文献

质子放疗与光子辅助放疗对头颈部和脊髓脊索瘤治疗中总生存期的影响:一项国家癌症数据库分析

Impact of proton versus photon adjuvant radiotherapy on overall survival in the management of skull base and spinal chordomas: a National Cancer Database analysis.

作者信息

El-Hajj Victor Gabriel, Ghaith Abdul Karim, Hoang Harry, Nguyen Ryan H, Al-Saidi Neil Nazar, Graepel Stephen P, Atallah Elias, Elmi-Terander Adrian, Lehrer Eric J, Brown Paul D, Bydon Mohamad

机构信息

1Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

2Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2024 Aug 23;142(1):239-247. doi: 10.3171/2024.5.JNS24511. Print 2025 Jan 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Chordomas are rare tumors that originate from undifferentiated remnants of the notochord. Currently, there are no established guidelines regarding the choice of adjuvant radiation modality for patients surgically treated for chordomas. Using a nationwide, multicenter database, the authors aimed to compare long-term survival outcomes associated with the use of proton or photon adjuvant therapy for the management of chordomas of skull base and spine.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for chordoma cases from 2004 to 2017. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were extracted from the database. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted to investigate differences in outcome on propensity score-matched cohorts of patients treated with proton or photon adjuvant radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Of the 3490 patients available, 424 met the inclusion criteria for this study. In the prematching analysis, patients receiving adjuvant photon therapy were significantly older (median age 57.0 vs 45.0 years, p < 0.001) and were more commonly male (61% vs 43%, p < 0.001) compared with those receiving proton therapy. Races were equally distributed among radiotherapy modalities (p = 0.64). Patients with chordomas of the mobile spine or sacrum were less likely to receive proton compared with photon therapy (37% vs 58%). Patients receiving proton therapy were more often represented among private insurance holders (69% vs 52%, p < 0.001) as well as in the highest income quartile (52% vs 40%, p = 0.008). Patients traveled farther to receive proton, as opposed to photon, therapy (median 59.0 vs 34.9 miles, p < 0.001). On postmatching Kaplan-Meier analysis encompassing all chordoma cases, no difference in OS between photon and proton therapy was revealed (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.39-1.44; p = 0.39). A Kaplan-Meier analysis only including patients with skull base chordomas reached similar results (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.31-2.22; p = 0.71). In patients with spine chordomas, however, a significant difference was found, as proton therapy exhibited a superior OS over photon therapy (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.81; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this nationwide analysis, patients with private insurance and higher income were more likely to receive proton adjuvant radiotherapy, while those with spinal or sacral chordomas were less likely to receive this modality. Despite this disparity, an OS benefit was observed in patients with chordomas of the spine and sacrum who received adjuvant proton therapy, in comparison with a matched cohort of patients treated with photon therapy. Conversely, this advantageous outcome was not evident in cases of chordomas located at the skull base.

摘要

目的

脊索瘤是起源于脊索未分化残余组织的罕见肿瘤。目前,对于接受手术治疗的脊索瘤患者,在辅助放疗方式的选择上尚无既定指南。作者利用一个全国性的多中心数据库,旨在比较质子或光子辅助治疗用于颅底和脊柱脊索瘤治疗时的长期生存结果。

方法

查询国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中2004年至2017年的脊索瘤病例。从数据库中提取患者、肿瘤和治疗特征。主要结局为总生存期(OS)。进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析,以研究接受质子或光子辅助放疗的倾向评分匹配队列患者在结局上的差异。

结果

在3490例可用患者中,424例符合本研究的纳入标准。在匹配前分析中,与接受质子治疗的患者相比,接受辅助光子治疗的患者年龄显著更大(中位年龄57.0岁对45.0岁,p<0.001),男性也更为常见(61%对43%,p<0.001)。种族在放疗方式之间分布均衡(p = 0.64)。与光子治疗相比,活动脊柱或骶骨脊索瘤患者接受质子治疗的可能性较小(37%对58%)。接受质子治疗的患者在私人保险持有者中更为常见(69%对52%,p<0.001),在最高收入四分位数中也是如此(52%对40%,p = 0.0(此处原文有误,推测应为0.008))。与光子治疗相比,患者接受质子治疗要前往更远的地方(中位距离59.0英里对34.9英里,p<0.001)。在涵盖所有脊索瘤病例的匹配后Kaplan-Meier分析中,未发现光子和质子治疗在OS方面存在差异(风险比0.75,95%置信区间0.39 - 1.44;p = 0.39)。仅纳入颅底脊索瘤患者的Kaplan-Meier分析得出了类似结果(风险比0.83,95%置信区间0.31 - 2.22;p = 0.7(此处原文有误,推测应为0.71))。然而,在脊柱脊索瘤患者中发现了显著差异,因为质子治疗的OS优于光子治疗(风险比0.28,95%置信区间0.09 - 0.81;p = 0.012)。

结论

基于这项全国性分析,拥有私人保险和高收入的患者更有可能接受质子辅助放疗,而患有脊柱或骶骨脊索瘤的患者接受这种治疗方式的可能性较小。尽管存在这种差异,但与接受光子治疗的匹配队列患者相比,接受辅助质子治疗的脊柱和骶骨脊索瘤患者观察到了OS获益。相反,在颅底脊索瘤病例中,这种有利结果并不明显。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验