Delft University of Technology, Department of Water Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN, Delft, the Netherlands.
Delft University of Technology, Department of Water Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN, Delft, the Netherlands.
Water Res. 2024 Nov 1;265:122296. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122296. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
While air stripping combined with acid scrubbing remains a competitive technology for the removal and recovery of ammonia from wastewater streams, its use of strong acids is concerning. Organic acids offer promising alternatives to strong acids like sulphuric acid, but their application remains limited due to high cost. This study proposes an integration of air stripping and organic acid scrubbing with bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BPMED) to regenerate the organic acids. We compared the energy consumption and current efficiency of BPMED in recovering dissolved ammonia and regenerating sulphuric, citric, and maleic acids from synthetic scrubber effluents. Current efficiency was lower when regenerating sulphuric acid (22 %) compared to citric (47 %) and maleic acid (37 %), attributable to the competitive proton transport over ammonium across the cation exchange membrane. Organic salts functioned as buffers, reducing the concentration of free protons, resulting in higher ammonium removal efficiencies with citrate (75 %) and malate (68 %), compared to sulphate (29 %). Consequently, the energy consumption of the BPMED decreased by 54 % and 35 % while regenerating citric and maleic acids, respectively, compared to sulfuric acid. Membrane characterisation experiments showed that the electrical conductivity ranking, ammonium citrate > ammonium malate > ammonium sulphate, was mirrored by the energy consumption (kWh/kg-N recovered) ranking, ammonium sulphate (15.6) < ammonium malate (10.2) < ammonium citrate (7.2), while the permselectivity ranking, ammonium sulphate > ammonium citrate > ammonium malate, aligned with calculated charge densities. This work demonstrates the potential of combining organic acid scrubbers with BPMED for ammonium recovery from wastewater effluents with minimum chemical input.
虽然空气汽提与酸洗涤相结合仍然是从废水中去除和回收氨的一种有竞争力的技术,但它使用强酸令人担忧。有机酸为硫酸等强酸提供了有前景的替代品,但由于成本高,其应用仍然有限。本研究提出了将空气汽提与有机酸酸洗与双极膜电渗析(BPMED)相结合,以再生有机酸。我们比较了 BPMED 从合成洗涤器废水中回收溶解氨和再生硫酸、柠檬酸和马来酸的能耗和电流效率。当再生硫酸(22%)时,电流效率低于柠檬酸(47%)和马来酸(37%),这归因于阳离子交换膜中铵相对于质子的竞争传输。有机盐作为缓冲剂,减少了游离质子的浓度,导致柠檬酸(75%)和苹果酸(68%)的铵去除效率高于硫酸盐(29%)。因此,与再生硫酸相比,分别再生柠檬酸和马来酸时,BPMED 的能耗降低了 54%和 35%。膜特性实验表明,电导率排序为柠檬酸铵>苹果酸铵>硫酸铵,与能耗(每回收公斤氮的千瓦时数)排序相对应,硫酸铵(15.6)<苹果酸铵(10.2)<柠檬酸铵(7.2),而选择透过性排序为硫酸铵>柠檬酸铵>苹果酸铵,与计算出的电荷密度一致。这项工作表明,将有机酸洗涤器与 BPMED 结合起来,从废水废水中回收氨,只需最小的化学投入,具有很大的潜力。