Suppr超能文献

射频作为一种定位触诊阴性乳腺病变的方法。

Radiofrequency as a method of localizing impalpable breast lesions.

机构信息

Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust, UK.

Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Surgeon. 2024 Oct;22(5):296-300. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2024.08.001. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of early stage breast cancer has risen as a result of increased detection of non-palpable tumors through the implementation of screening programs and greater public awareness. Performing breast-conserving surgery can be challenging due to the need for accurate localization of non-palpable breast lesions, particularly given the logistical difficulties associated with wire localization. After implementing a new technique for localizing non-palpable breast lesions (LOCalizerTM Radiofrequency identification TAG-Hologic®), a radiofrequency identification tag localization device manufactured by Hologic, Inc. in Marlborough, MA, was launched in 2017, our objective was to investigate its impact on surgical outcomes, whether there was an increase in re-excision rates for positive margins and whether the attainment of clear margins was dependent on the exact positioning of the RFID device.

METHOD

A single-center single-arm interventional study, data were gathered both in a forward-looking manner for 1 year (prospectively) and by looking back at past records for 1 year (retrospectively) for a total period of two years. Individuals who were diagnosed with non-palpable breast lesions, as confirmed by histological analysis, or invasive breast cancer and who were scheduled to undergo breast-conserving surgery were eligible for inclusion in the study. The RFID (Radiofrequency Identification) method was used to localize the lesions prior to surgery. Either with a mammogram or ultrasound scan position of the Tag was recorded, including the distance of the lesion from the center of the lesion and the lesion depth from the skin in millimeters. The rate of re-excision was documented and examined in relation to the parameters mentioned above.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty RFID Tags were inserted in two hundred and seventeen (three patient had bilateral tags insertion), patients aged between 30 and 85 had a localizer Tag inserted between Oct 2020 and Oct 2022. Three patients had non-palpable breast lesions in both breasts. Fourteen were inserted under stereotactic guidance and two hundred and six under ultrasound guidance. Ten patients subsequently had wire insertion also due to Tag position. Of 210 procedures, RFIF Tags within the lesion was seen in hundred and sixty patients (76.19 %). An additional 50 procedures were performed using the RFID Tag system, which were not directly related to the lesion but were deemed appropriate to proceed with. Out of a total of 220 procedures, positive margins were observed in 38 cases (17.27 %). Among these cases, eleven (28.94 %) involved the use of the RFID Tag system, not within the lesion but adjacent to it (within 15 mm surrounding the lesion).

CONCLUSION

RFID is a good alternative to wire localization of non-palpable breast lesions. Re-excision rates are higher in patients with Tag outside the lesion compared to those with Tag within the lesion.

摘要

背景

由于通过实施筛查计划和提高公众意识提高了对非触诊肿瘤的检测,早期乳腺癌的发病率有所上升。由于需要准确定位非触诊的乳房病变,进行保乳手术可能具有挑战性,特别是由于与导丝定位相关的后勤困难。在实施了一种用于定位非触诊乳房病变(LocalizerTM 射频识别 TAG-Hologic®)的新技术后,Hologic,Inc. 于 2017 年推出了一种射频识别标签定位装置,该装置位于马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒,我们的目的是研究它对手术结果的影响,是否存在阳性切缘的再切除率增加的情况,以及获得无肿瘤切缘是否取决于 RFID 装置的精确定位。

方法

一项单中心单臂干预性研究,前瞻性地收集了 1 年的数据(前瞻性),并通过回顾过去 1 年的数据(回顾性),总共两年。符合以下条件的非触诊乳房病变或浸润性乳腺癌患者,经组织学分析确诊,且拟行保乳手术,均有资格入组。在手术前使用 RFID(射频识别)方法定位病变。通过乳房 X 光或超声扫描记录 Tag 的位置,包括病变与病变中心的距离以及病变距皮肤的深度(以毫米为单位)。记录并检查与上述参数有关的再切除率。

结果

在 2020 年 10 月至 2022 年 10 月期间,在 217 例患者(3 例患者双侧插入标签)中插入了 220 个 RFID 标签,患者年龄在 30 至 85 岁之间。有 3 例患者双侧乳房均有非触诊乳房病变。其中 14 例在立体定向引导下插入,206 例在超声引导下插入。由于 Tag 位置,另外 10 例患者随后也插入了导丝。在 210 例手术中,有 160 例患者(76.19%)在病变中可见 RFIF Tag。另外还进行了 50 次与病变无关但认为适合进行的 RFID Tag 系统手术。在总共 220 次手术中,有 38 例(17.27%)出现阳性切缘。其中 11 例(28.94%)患者使用了不在病变内但紧邻病变的 RFID Tag 系统(在病变周围 15 毫米范围内)。

结论

RFID 是定位非触诊乳房病变的一种很好的替代方法。与 Tag 在病变内的患者相比,Tag 在病变外的患者再切除率更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验