Regional citrate anticoagulation versus LMWH anticoagulation for CRRT in liver failure patients without increased bleeding risk.

BACKGROUND

The optimal anticoagulation regimen for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in liver failure (LF) patients without increased bleeding risk remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a monocentric retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) anticoagulation for CRRT in LF without increased bleeding risk.

METHOD

According to the anticoagulation strategy for CRRT, patients were divided into the RCA and LMWH-anticoagulation groups. The evaluated endpoints were patient survival, filter lifespan, bleeding, citrate accumulation, and totCa/ionCa ratio.

RESULT

Totally 167 and 164 filters were used in the RCA and LMWH group, respectively. The median filter lifespan was significantly longer in the RCA group (34 h (IQR = 24-54) versus 24 h (IQR = 18-45.5) [95%CI, 24.5-33];  < 0.001). The 4-week mortality rate was significantly higher in the LMWH-anticoagulation group (71 (57.72%) vs 53 (40.46%);  = 0.006). After adjusted the important parameters in the multivariate COX regression model, the mortality risk was significantly reduced in the RCA group (HR = 0.668 [95%CI, 0.468-0.955];  = 0.027). In the LMWH group, 30 bleeding episodes (24,19%) were observed, whereas only 7 (5.34%) occurred in the RCA group ( < 0.001). Two patients (1.5%) in the RCA group occurred citrate accumulation.

CONCLUSIONS

In LF patients without increased bleeding risk who underwent CRRT, RCA significantly extended the filter lifespan and improved patient survival rate. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the two groups.