• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Navigating the trauma-The experiences of significant others supporting patients with severe burn injury: A narrative inquiry.应对创伤——严重烧伤患者重要他人的支持经历:一项叙事探究
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Apr;81(4):1966-1977. doi: 10.1111/jan.16404. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
2
"It's a big trauma for the family": A qualitative insight into the psychological trauma of paediatric burns from the perspective of mothers.“这对整个家庭来说是一个巨大的创伤”:从母亲的角度看儿科烧伤的心理创伤。
Burns. 2024 Feb;50(1):262-274. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2023.06.014. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
3
The experiences of 'significant others' supporting people with severe burn injury: An integrative literature review.支持严重烧伤患者的“重要他人”的经历:一项综合文献综述。
Aust Crit Care. 2022 May;35(3):321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Women's recovery, negotiation of appearance, and social reintegration following a burn.烧伤后女性的康复、外表调适及社会重新融入。
Burns. 2018 Jun;44(4):841-849. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.12.004. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
The trauma bubble: patient and family experience of serious burn injury.创伤泡沫:严重烧伤患者及其家属的经历
J Burn Care Res. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):e413-27. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000030.
6
Paediatric burns: from the voice of the child.小儿烧伤:来自儿童的声音。
Burns. 2014 Jun;40(4):606-15. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.08.031. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
7
Adapting to life after burn injury--reflections on care.适应烧伤后的生活——对护理的思考
J Burn Care Res. 2012 Sep-Oct;33(5):595-605. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31823d0a11.
8
Caregivers' experiences in helping individuals with severe and enduring mental health challenges integrate into the community: A qualitative descriptive study in Singapore.照顾者帮助有严重和持久精神健康挑战的个体融入社区的体验:新加坡的一项定性描述性研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Dec;31(6):1120-1132. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13071. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
9
Psychosocial needs of burns nurses: a descriptive phenomenological inquiry.烧伤护士的心理社会需求:一项描述性现象学探究
J Burn Care Res. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):286-93. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31820aaf37.
10
The lived experience of relationships after major burn injury.严重烧伤后人际关系的生活体验。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Aug;23(15-16):2323-31. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12514. Epub 2014 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Managing the elephant in the room: responding to COVID-19's impact on data collection.应对“房间里的大象”:应对 COVID-19 对数据收集的影响。
Nurse Res. 2023 Mar 8;31(1):33-39. doi: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1874. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
2
Experiences and needs of families with a relative admitted to an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review of qualitative studies.亲属入住成人重症监护病房的家庭的经验和需求:定性研究的系统评价。
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Jul 1;19(7):1499-1554. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00136.
3
Paramedic interactions with significant others during and after resuscitation and death of a patient.急救员在患者复苏期间和之后与重要他人的互动,以及患者死亡时。
Australas Emerg Care. 2023 Jun;26(2):113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
4
The Effect of Hospital Visitor Policies on Patients, Their Visitors, and Health Care Providers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.《COVID-19 大流行期间医院访客政策对患者、访客和医疗保健提供者的影响:系统评价》。
Am J Med. 2022 Oct;135(10):1158-1167.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
The Four Horsemen of Fear: An Integrated Model of Understanding Fear Experiences During the Covid-19 Pandemic.恐惧的四大因素:一种理解新冠疫情期间恐惧体验的综合模型
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2020 Apr;17(2):41-45. doi: 10.36131/CN20200202.
6
Consequences of visiting restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic: An integrative review.疫情期间探视限制的后果:综合述评。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:104000. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104000. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
7
The experiences of 'significant others' supporting people with severe burn injury: An integrative literature review.支持严重烧伤患者的“重要他人”的经历:一项综合文献综述。
Aust Crit Care. 2022 May;35(3):321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
8
Nationwide efforts for trauma-informed care implementation and workforce development in healthcare and related fields: a systematic review.全国范围内努力在医疗保健和相关领域实施以创伤知情关怀为基础的护理并发展相关人员队伍:系统评价。
Turk J Pediatr. 2020;62(6):906-920. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2020.06.002.
9
Prevalence and associated factors of post-traumatic stress disorder in burned patients and their family members.烧伤患者及其家庭成员创伤后应激障碍的患病率及相关因素。
Burns. 2021 Aug;47(5):1102-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
10
"Can mental health nurses working in acute mental health units really be trauma-informed?" An integrative review of the literature.“在急性精神卫生单位工作的精神科护士真的能了解创伤吗?”文献综合评论。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Oct;28(5):900-923. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12717. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

应对创伤——严重烧伤患者重要他人的支持经历:一项叙事探究

Navigating the trauma-The experiences of significant others supporting patients with severe burn injury: A narrative inquiry.

作者信息

Flannery Elizabeth, Murphy Gillian, Peters Kath, Halcomb Elizabeth, Ramjan Lucie M

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.

School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2025 Apr;81(4):1966-1977. doi: 10.1111/jan.16404. Epub 2024 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1111/jan.16404
PMID:39180738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11896915/
Abstract

AIM

To explore the experiences of significant others of adult patients with severe burn injury in the Intensive Care Unit. Specifically, this study explored the strategies implemented by significant others and obstacles faced that served to protect or placed them at risk of psychological sequelae during their experience of trauma.

DESIGN

A qualitative study using a Narrative Inquiry approach was undertaken.

METHODS

Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants during 2021-2022, who were a significant other of an adult patient in ICU with severe burn injury. These participants were recruited from the two major severe burns receiving hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Participants' stories were analysed using a narrative analysis approach informed by Polkinghorne. The COREQ guideline was used in reporting.

RESULTS

As each participant navigated the traumatic experience of supporting a loved one with a severe burn injury, they faced unique obstacles to maintaining their own mental health and well-being. They employed strategies that were likely to protect them on this journey. Psychologically protective factors included taking back control, coexisting in the trauma with the patient and forging a trauma bond. These strategies effectively contained the trauma and protected others (such as children, extended family and friends). While this allowed significant others an element of control, it also effectively isolated them from the support of family and friends.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that significant others may also experience personal trauma and may not recognize this as they focus all their attention on supporting the patient with the burn injury.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

With increased awareness of both protective and risk factors, support can be directed towards enhancing protective factors and addressing risk factors, thereby decreasing their impact and improving support for significant others.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

摘要

目的

探讨成年重症烧伤患者的重要他人在重症监护病房的经历。具体而言,本研究探讨了重要他人实施的策略以及他们在创伤经历中面临的阻碍,这些阻碍对其心理后遗症起到了保护作用或使其面临风险。

设计

采用叙事探究法进行定性研究。

方法

2021年至2022年期间,对17名参与者进行了个体半结构式访谈,他们均为澳大利亚新南威尔士州两家主要重症烧伤收治医院中成年重症烧伤患者的重要他人。采用由波尔金霍恩提出的叙事分析方法对参与者的故事进行分析。报告遵循COREQ指南。

结果

在每位参与者应对支持重度烧伤亲人这一创伤经历的过程中,他们在维护自身心理健康和幸福方面都面临着独特的障碍。他们采用了一些可能在此过程中保护自己的策略。心理保护因素包括重新获得掌控感、与患者一同面对创伤以及建立创伤联结。这些策略有效地控制了创伤并保护了他人(如儿童、大家庭成员和朋友)。虽然这让重要他人有了一定的掌控感,但也有效地使他们与家人和朋友的支持隔离开来。

结论

本研究表明,重要他人也可能经历个人创伤,且在将全部注意力集中于支持烧伤患者时可能并未意识到这一点。

对实践的启示

随着对保护因素和风险因素认识的提高,可以针对性地提供支持,以增强保护因素并应对风险因素,从而降低其影响,改善对重要他人的支持。

患者或公众参与

无患者或公众参与。