• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简化乙酰甲胆碱激发试验对儿童是安全的。

The Abbreviated Methacholine Challenge Test is Safe for Children.

作者信息

Hevroni Avigdor, Nemet Shay, Ringel Amit, Boursheh Laurice, Handler Nitay Alter, Bar-Yishay Ephraim

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics and the Pediatric Pulmonology and CF Unit, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Department of Pediatrics, Assuta Medical Center, Ashdod, Israel.

Clinical Immunology Allergy and AIDS Center, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2025 Jan;276:114250. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114250. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114250
PMID:39181318
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of an abbreviated methacholine challenge test (MCT) protocol in children.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective, observational study enrolled children aged 6 through 18 years referred for the MCT. The abbreviated protocol was initiated with a methacholine dose of 0.03 mg/ml and escalated in fourfold increments, unless the forced expiratory volume at 1 second decline exceeded 10%, at which point the next dose was only doubled. The safety of this abbreviated approach was assessed by monitoring adverse events, and specifically, decreases in forced expiratory volume at 1 second over 40%, hypoxemia, or uncontrollable cough. The number of methacholine doses and test duration were recorded and compared with estimated outcomes derived from the full-length MCT protocol.

RESULTS

One hundred twelve participants, aged 13.7 years (±3.3), successfully completed the protocol. Fifty-seven (51%) presented a positive MCT response. No significant clinical adverse events were observed. Of all participants, 2.7% exhibited an exaggerated response, in line with previously reported findings for the full-length protocol. The abbreviated approach resulted in an estimated average time-savings of 18:19 minutes per participant, thus reducing test length by 22:47 minutes for a negative MCT and by 14:34 minutes for a positive outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This abbreviated MCT protocol is safe for children and effectively shortens the duration of the MCT.

摘要

目的

评估简化的乙酰甲胆碱激发试验(MCT)方案在儿童中的安全性。

研究设计

这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了因MCT前来就诊的6至18岁儿童。简化方案起始的乙酰甲胆碱剂量为0.03mg/ml,并以四倍增量递增,除非第1秒用力呼气量下降超过10%,此时下一剂量仅加倍。通过监测不良事件,特别是第1秒用力呼气量下降超过40%、低氧血症或无法控制的咳嗽,来评估这种简化方法的安全性。记录乙酰甲胆碱剂量数和测试持续时间,并与从完整MCT方案得出的估计结果进行比较。

结果

112名年龄为13.7岁(±3.3)的参与者成功完成了该方案。57名(51%)呈现出MCT阳性反应。未观察到显著的临床不良事件。在所有参与者中,2.7%表现出过度反应,这与之前关于完整方案的报道结果一致。简化方法使每位参与者估计平均节省时间18分19秒,因此对于MCT阴性结果,测试时长缩短了22分47秒,对于阳性结果,缩短了14分34秒。

结论

这种简化的MCT方案对儿童是安全的,并有效缩短了MCT的时长。

相似文献

1
The Abbreviated Methacholine Challenge Test is Safe for Children.简化乙酰甲胆碱激发试验对儿童是安全的。
J Pediatr. 2025 Jan;276:114250. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114250. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
2
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
3
Utility and efficiency of methacholine challenge testing in evaluating pediatric asthma: unraveling the diagnostic conundrum.乙酰甲胆碱激发试验在评估儿童哮喘中的效用和效率:揭开诊断难题。
J Asthma. 2021 Jan;58(1):69-74. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1663431. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of methacholine challenge tests assessing airway hyperreactivity in asthmatic patients - a multifunctional approach.评估哮喘患者气道高反应性的乙酰甲胆碱激发试验的诊断准确性——一种多功能方法。
Respir Res. 2016 Nov 17;17(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0470-0.
5
The potential use of spirometry during methacholine challenge test in young children with respiratory symptoms.在有呼吸道症状的幼儿中,在乙酰甲胆碱激发试验期间肺活量测定法的潜在应用。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009 Jul;44(7):720-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20978.
6
Single and multiple breath nitrogen washout compared with the methacholine test in patients with suspected asthma and normal spirometry.疑似哮喘且肺功能正常患者中,单次和多次呼吸氮冲洗试验与乙酰甲胆碱试验的比较。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 May 2;11(1):e001919. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001919.
7
Effect of lowering methacholine challenge test cutoff in children.降低儿童乙酰甲胆碱激发试验临界值的效果。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 Oct;113(4):393-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.06.024. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
8
Comparison of spirometry and impulse oscillometry in methacholine challenge test for the detection of airway hyperresponsiveness in adults.在成人乙酰甲胆碱激发试验中,肺量计与脉冲振荡法检测气道高反应性的比较。
Tuberk Toraks. 2021 Mar;69(1):1-8. doi: 10.5578/tt.20219901.
9
Exertional-induced bronchoconstriction: comparison between cardiopulmonary exercise test and methacholine challenging test.运动诱发性支气管收缩:心肺运动试验与乙酰甲胆碱激发试验的比较
Ann Card Anaesth. 2015 Oct-Dec;18(4):479-85. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.166443.
10
Diagnostic value of the hypertonic saline bronchial provocation test in children with asthma using the high-power aerosol provocation system.高雾化吸入激发系统在儿童哮喘中应用高渗盐水支气管激发试验的诊断价值。
J Asthma. 2021 May;58(5):625-632. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1713148. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The Advantages of FEV Percent Predicted Change During Bronchial Challenge Testing.支气管激发试验中预计FEV变化百分比的优势
Lung. 2025 Jul 5;203(1):73. doi: 10.1007/s00408-025-00823-5.