Suppr超能文献

苏格兰癌症护理多学科团队(MDT)决策中的认知偏差映射:一项认知民族志研究方案。

Mapping cognitive biases in multidisciplinary team (MDT) decision-making for cancer care in Scotland: a cognitive ethnography study protocol.

机构信息

Surgical Sabermetrics Laboratory, Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Surgical Sabermetrics Laboratory, Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 24;14(8):e086775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086775.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The efficiency of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) in cancer care hinges on facilitating clinicians' cognitive processes as they navigate complex and uncertain judgements during treatment planning. When systems and workflows are not designed to adequately support human judgement and decision-making, even experts are prone to fallible reasoning due to cognitive biases. Incomplete integration of information or biased interpretations of patient data can lead to clinical errors and delays in the implementation of treatment recommendations. Though their impact is intuitively recognised, there is currently a paucity of empirical work on cognitive biases in MDT decision-making. Our study aims to explicate the impact of such biases on treatment planning and establish a foundation for targeted investigations and interventions to mitigate their negative effects.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a qualitative, observational study. We employ cognitive ethnography, informed by the Distributed Cognition for Teamwork framework to assess and evaluate MDT decision-making processes. The study involves in-person and virtual field observations of hepatopancreaticobiliary and upper gastrointestinal MDTs and interviews with their members over several months. The data generated will be analysed in a hybrid inductive/deductive fashion to develop a comprehensive map of potential cognitive biases in MDT decision processes identifying antecedents and risk factors of suboptimal treatment planning processes. Further, we will identify components of the MDT environment that can be redesigned to support decision-making via development of an MDT workspace evaluation tool.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This project has received management and ethical approvals from NHS Lothian Research and Development (2023/0245) and the University of Edinburgh Medical School ethical review committee (23-EMREC-049). Findings will be shared with participating MDTs and disseminated via a PhD thesis, international conference presentations and relevant scientific journals.

摘要

简介

多学科团队 (MDT) 在癌症治疗中的效率取决于为临床医生在治疗计划期间进行复杂和不确定判断时提供认知过程的便利。当系统和工作流程的设计不能充分支持人类的判断和决策时,即使是专家也容易受到认知偏差的影响而出现错误推理。信息的不完全整合或对患者数据的有偏差的解释可能导致临床错误,并延迟治疗建议的实施。尽管这些影响是直观的,但目前在 MDT 决策中的认知偏差方面的实证工作很少。我们的研究旨在阐明这些偏差对治疗计划的影响,并为有针对性的调查和干预措施奠定基础,以减轻其负面影响。

方法和分析

这是一项定性、观察性研究。我们采用认知民族志,以团队分布式认知框架为指导,评估和评估 MDT 决策过程。该研究涉及对肝胆胰和上胃肠道 MDT 的现场和虚拟观察,并在几个月内对其成员进行访谈。生成的数据将以混合归纳/演绎的方式进行分析,以开发 MDT 决策过程中潜在认知偏差的综合图,确定次优治疗计划过程的前因和风险因素。此外,我们将确定 MDT 环境的组成部分,可以通过开发 MDT 工作空间评估工具来重新设计以支持决策。

伦理和传播

该项目已获得 NHS 洛锡安研发管理和伦理批准(2023/0245)和爱丁堡大学医学院伦理审查委员会(23-EMREC-049)。研究结果将与参与的 MDT 共享,并通过博士论文、国际会议演讲和相关科学期刊进行传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8456/11404157/0dac18b34c41/bmjopen-14-8-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验