Suppr超能文献

超敏锐度居家监测患者的数字排斥、社会剥夺与临床结局

Digital Exclusion, Social Deprivation, and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Hyperacuity Home Monitoring.

作者信息

Mendall Jessica, Islam Meriam, Wong Karen, Sansome Stafford, Sim Dawn A, Bachmann Lucas M, Huemer Josef, Kang Swan

机构信息

University College London, London, UK.

Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Oct;13(10):2759-2769. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-01020-y. Epub 2024 Aug 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Digital exclusion is a growing challenge when deploying digital patient care pathways and a potential barrier to widespread implementation, especially in the field of smartphone-based self-monitoring of vision. This retrospective case series seeks to examine the characteristics of individuals who adhere to a smartphone home monitoring programme using the Alleye app for retinal disease, with a focus on digital exclusion, social deprivation and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 89 patients with retinal pathologies including diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusions at Moorfields Eye Hospital participating in an Alleye home monitoring programme between April 2020 and November 2022. Postcodes were used to determine the Digital Exclusion Risk Index (DERI) and the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) rebased for London. Clinical information from the electronic patient record and Alleye app usage data were extracted for each patient. Associations between the DERI/IMD, clinical parameters and app use were examined using multivariable regression models.

RESULTS

Mean DERI was 2.56 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.36), IMD was 6.25 (SD = 2.79), visual acuity (VA) in the better eye at study entry was 83.28 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (SD = 7.92), and mean follow-up was 344.46 days (SD = 260.13). During the observation period, 36% received an intravitreal injection (IVI) and VA fell by at least ten letters in approximately one in four patients. In 87.5% of patients requiring IVI, the use of the app increased. We found no association between clinical parameters and programme adherence for DERI or IMD.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no association between high digital exclusion risk and high social deprivation with monitoring adherence to smartphone-based self-monitoring of vision, contrary to the currently available evidence. This suggests that smartphone-based self-monitoring of vision is accessible to population groups of varying digital exclusion and social deprivation risk, and can be safely employed to monitor clinical progression.

摘要

引言

在部署数字患者护理路径时,数字排斥是一个日益严峻的挑战,也是广泛实施的潜在障碍,尤其是在基于智能手机的视力自我监测领域。本回顾性病例系列旨在研究使用Alleye应用程序进行视网膜疾病智能手机家庭监测的个体特征,重点关注数字排斥、社会剥夺和临床结果。

方法

我们对2020年4月至2022年11月期间在摩尔菲尔德眼科医院参与Alleye家庭监测项目的89例视网膜病变患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者包括糖尿病视网膜病变和视网膜静脉阻塞。使用邮政编码确定数字排斥风险指数(DERI)和基于伦敦重新计算的多重剥夺指数(IMD)。提取每位患者电子病历中的临床信息和Alleye应用程序使用数据。使用多变量回归模型检查DERI/IMD、临床参数与应用程序使用之间的关联。

结果

平均DERI为2.56(标准差[SD]=0.36),IMD为6.25(SD=2.79),研究开始时较好眼的视力(VA)为83.28糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究(ETDRS)字母(SD=7.92),平均随访时间为344.46天(SD=260.13)。在观察期内,36%的患者接受了玻璃体内注射(IVI),约四分之一的患者VA下降至少十个字母。在87.5%需要IVI的患者中,应用程序的使用增加。我们发现临床参数与DERI或IMD的项目依从性之间没有关联。

结论

与现有证据相反,我们发现高数字排斥风险和高社会剥夺与基于智能手机的视力自我监测的监测依从性之间没有关联。这表明,不同数字排斥和社会剥夺风险的人群都可以使用基于智能手机的视力自我监测,并且可以安全地用于监测临床进展。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验