• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科罗拉多州医疗服务提供者对过量预防场所的认知和态度。

Healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes about overdose prevention sites in Colorado.

机构信息

College of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Englewood, CO, USA.

Biomedical Sciences Department, Rocky Vista University, Englewood, CO, USA.

出版信息

Harm Reduct J. 2024 Aug 24;21(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01066-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12954-024-01066-y
PMID:39182085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11344454/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Overdose prevention sites (OPS) are a harm reduction strategy that offer people who use drugs a variety of resources including but not limited to sterile supplies, linkage to healthcare resources, and intervention if an overdose occurs. OPS operate in over 120 countries and evidence has demonstrated they are an effective harm reduction strategy. Despite their success elsewhere, OPS remain federally illegal in the United States and thus there is limited research on their implementation and outcomes in the United States. This study aimed to identify Colorado healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes about OPS and determine if there is a correlation between healthcare providers with more knowledge about OPS having a more positive attitude about OPS.

METHODS

An electronic survey was distributed to healthcare providers in Colorado. Responses were collected in early 2022 and recorded on a 5-point Likert scale. Mean scores between 1 and 5 were calculated for each participant and analysis of variance methods were used to determine correlating demographic factors. A p value of ≤ 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance of all findings.

RESULTS

This study included 698 participants. A Pearson correlation analysis revealed a strong positive relationship (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001) between provider knowledge and attitudes about OPS. Emergency medicine providers scored the highest in mean knowledge and attitude scores in comparison to all other specialties. Respondents affiliated with a harm reduction center exhibited the highest mean knowledge and attitude scores. Mean knowledge and attitude scores generally rose with respondents' increasing encounters with people who inject drugs in a typical workday, except when reaching nine or more encounters, where a sharp decline occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the importance of education, exposure to harm reduction strategies, and inter-specialty collaboration in shaping healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes about OPS. The positive correlation between providers' knowledge and attitudes about OPS suggests that educating healthcare providers on harm reduction strategies, specifically OPS, may lead to reduced stigmatization of OPS among healthcare professionals.

摘要

背景

过量预防场所(OPS)是一种减少伤害的策略,为使用毒品的人提供各种资源,包括但不限于无菌用品、与医疗保健资源的联系,以及在发生过量时的干预。OPS 在 120 多个国家开展业务,有证据表明它们是一种有效的减少伤害的策略。尽管在其他地方取得了成功,但 OPS 在美国仍然是联邦非法的,因此在美国,关于它们的实施和结果的研究有限。本研究旨在确定科罗拉多州医疗保健提供者对 OPS 的知识和态度,并确定医疗保健提供者对 OPS 的了解程度与对 OPS 的态度之间是否存在相关性。

方法

向科罗拉多州的医疗保健提供者分发了一份电子调查。在 2022 年初收集了答复,并记录在 5 点李克特量表上。为每个参与者计算了 1 到 5 之间的平均分数,并使用方差分析方法确定了相关的人口统计学因素。所有发现的统计显著性均使用 p 值≤0.05 来确定。

结果

本研究包括 698 名参与者。皮尔逊相关分析显示,提供者对 OPS 的知识和态度之间存在很强的正相关关系(r=0.76,p<0.0001)。与所有其他专业相比,急诊医学提供者在知识和态度得分方面得分最高。与减少伤害中心有关联的受访者表现出最高的平均知识和态度得分。平均知识和态度得分随着受访者在典型工作日与注射毒品者的接触次数的增加而普遍上升,除了接触次数达到 9 次或更多次时,得分急剧下降。

结论

我们的研究强调了教育、接触减少伤害策略以及专业间合作在塑造医疗保健提供者对 OPS 的知识和态度方面的重要性。提供者对 OPS 的知识和态度之间的正相关关系表明,对医疗保健提供者进行减少伤害策略的教育,特别是 OPS,可能会减少医疗保健专业人员对 OPS 的污名化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/11344454/6bbe3350e864/12954_2024_1066_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/11344454/c34a84c209ea/12954_2024_1066_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/11344454/723ef294123e/12954_2024_1066_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/11344454/05a21747e92c/12954_2024_1066_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/11344454/6bbe3350e864/12954_2024_1066_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/11344454/c34a84c209ea/12954_2024_1066_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/11344454/723ef294123e/12954_2024_1066_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/11344454/05a21747e92c/12954_2024_1066_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b20/11344454/6bbe3350e864/12954_2024_1066_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes about overdose prevention sites in Colorado.科罗拉多州医疗服务提供者对过量预防场所的认知和态度。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Aug 24;21(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01066-y.
2
Community pharmacists' attitudes toward and practice of pharmacy-based harm reduction services in Pittsburgh, PA: a descriptive survey.宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡市社区药剂师对基于药房的减少伤害服务的态度和实践:描述性调查。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jul 19;21(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01018-6.
3
The impact of knowledge on attitudes of emergency department staff towards patients with substance related presentations: a quantitative systematic review protocol.知识对急诊科工作人员对待物质相关就诊患者态度的影响:一项定量系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):133-45. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2203.
4
U.S. healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions concerning Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.美国医疗保健提供者对慢性疲劳综合征的知识、态度、信念和看法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Apr 21;11:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-28.
5
Perspectives of Canadian Healthcare and Harm Reduction Workers on Mobile Overdose Response Services: A Qualitative Study.加拿大医疗保健和减少伤害工作者对移动药物过量反应服务的看法:一项定性研究。
Subst Use Addctn J. 2024 Jul;45(3):506-514. doi: 10.1177/29767342241237169. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
6
Gendered violence and overdose prevention sites: a rapid ethnographic study during an overdose epidemic in Vancouver, Canada.性别暴力和过量预防场所:加拿大温哥华在过量流行期间的快速民族志研究。
Addiction. 2018 Dec;113(12):2261-2270. doi: 10.1111/add.14417. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
7
Healthcare Providers' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practice Behaviors for Educating Patients About Advance Directives: A National Survey.医疗服务提供者在就预先医疗指示对患者进行教育方面的态度、知识和实践行为:一项全国性调查。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 May;36(5):387-395. doi: 10.1177/1049909118813720. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
8
Overdose Prevention Site Acceptability among Residents and Businesses Surrounding a Proposed Site in Philadelphia, USA.美国费城拟设毒品注射点周边居民和商家对其可接受性的调查
J Urban Health. 2019 Jun;96(3):341-352. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00364-2.
9
Antimicrobial stewardship: Attitudes and practices of healthcare providers in selected health facilities in Uganda.抗菌药物管理:乌干达部分卫生机构医护人员的态度和实践。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 3;17(2):e0262993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262993. eCollection 2022.
10
Providers' knowledge and perception of xylazine in the unregulated drug supply: a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study.提供者对非管制药物供应中苯环己哌啶的知识和认知:一项序贯解释性混合方法研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Aug 16;21(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01052-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in Religious Commitment and Harm Reduction Attitudes Among US Medical Students by Sex Assigned at Birth: A Pilot Study.按出生时指定性别划分的美国医学生在宗教信仰和减少伤害态度上的差异:一项试点研究。
J Relig Health. 2024 Oct 29. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02155-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Overdose Prevention Centers, Crime, and Disorder in New York City.纽约市的过量预防中心、犯罪和混乱。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2342228. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42228.
2
Integrating harm reduction into acute care: A single center's experience.将减少伤害措施融入急性护理:单中心经验
JTCVS Open. 2023 May 31;15:342-347. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.05.005. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
The Nation's First Publicly Recognized Overdose Prevention Centers: Lessons Learned in New York City.全美首批官方认可的过量预防中心:纽约市的经验教训。
J Urban Health. 2023 Apr;100(2):245-254. doi: 10.1007/s11524-023-00717-y. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
4
Overdose Prevention Centers: An Essential Strategy to Address the Overdose Crisis.过量用药预防中心:应对过量用药危机的一项重要策略。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222153. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22153.
5
Meeting people where they are: implementing hospital-based substance use harm reduction.满足患者的需求:实施基于医院的物质使用减少伤害。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Feb 9;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00594-9.
6
Hostility, compassion and role reversal in West Virginia's long opioid overdose emergency.西弗吉尼亚州漫长的阿片类药物过量紧急事件中的敌意、同情和角色转变。
Harm Reduct J. 2020 Oct 12;17(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00416-w.
7
Evaluation of an Unsanctioned Safe Consumption Site in the United States.对美国一个未经批准的安全注射点的评估。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):589-590. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2015435. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
8
Emergency Department Clinicians' Attitudes Toward Opioid Use Disorder and Emergency Department-initiated Buprenorphine Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Study.急诊科临床医生对阿片类药物使用障碍及急诊科启动的丁丙诺啡治疗的态度:一项混合方法研究
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb 21;21(2):261-271. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.11.44382.
9
Vital Signs: Pharmacy-Based Naloxone Dispensing - United States, 2012-2018.生命体征:2012-2018 年美国基于药房的纳洛酮配药情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Aug 9;68(31):679-686. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6831e1.
10
Emergency department physicians' and pharmacists' perspectives on take-home naloxone.急诊科医生和药剂师对纳洛酮带回家的看法。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019 Feb;38(2):169-176. doi: 10.1111/dar.12894. Epub 2019 Jan 29.