Laboratory of Microbial Ecology and Genomics, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell'Università 10, 35020 Legnaro, Italy; PhD National Programme in One Health Approaches to Infectious Diseases and Life Science Research, Departiment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensice Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia 27100, Italy.
Laboratory of Microbial Ecology and Genomics, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell'Università 10, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
J Hazard Mater. 2024 Oct 5;478:135567. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135567. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
In the circular economy, reusing agricultural residues, treated biowaste, and sewage sludges-commonly referred to as soil conditioners-in agriculture is essential for converting waste into valuable resources. However, these materials can also contribute to the spread of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens in treated soils. In this study, we analyzed different soil conditioners categorized into five groups: compost from source-separated biowaste and green waste, agro-industrial digestate, digestate from anaerobic digestion of source-separated biowaste, compost from biowaste digestate, and sludges from wastewater treatment plants. Under Italian law, only the first two categories are approved for agricultural use, despite Regulation 1009/2019/EU allowing the use of digestate from anaerobic digestion of source-separated biowaste in CE-marked fertilizers. We examined the bacterial community and associated resistome of each sample using metagenomic approaches. Additionally, we detected and isolated various pathogens to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential risks associated with sludge application in agriculture. The compost samples exhibited higher bacterial diversity and a greater abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria compared to other samples, except for wastewater treatment plant sludges, which had the highest frequency of Salmonella isolation and resistome diversity. Our findings suggest integrating omics and cultivation-dependent methods to accurately assess the biological risks of using sludge in agriculture.
在循环经济中,农业中重复利用农业残留物、经过处理的生物废物和污水污泥(通常称为土壤调理剂)对于将废物转化为有价值的资源至关重要。然而,这些材料也可能导致处理后的土壤中抗微生物药物抗性病原体的传播。在这项研究中,我们分析了不同的土壤调理剂,将其分为五组:来自源头分离的生物废物和绿废物的堆肥、农业工业消化物、来自源头分离的生物废物的厌氧消化的消化物、来自生物废物消化物的堆肥和来自废水处理厂的污泥。根据意大利法律,仅前两类被批准用于农业用途,尽管欧盟法规 1009/2019/EU 允许在 CE 标记的肥料中使用来自源头分离的生物废物的厌氧消化的消化物。我们使用宏基因组学方法研究了每个样本的细菌群落和相关的抗药基因库。此外,我们还检测并分离了各种病原体,以全面了解污泥在农业中应用的潜在风险。与其他样本相比,堆肥样本的细菌多样性更高,潜在致病细菌的丰度也更高,除了废水处理厂的污泥,其分离出沙门氏菌的频率和抗药基因库的多样性最高。我们的研究结果表明,需要整合组学和培养依赖方法来准确评估在农业中使用污泥的生物风险。