Education Science Research Institute, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China.
Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Eval Program Plann. 2024 Dec;107:102481. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102481. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
Curriculum is the core element of talent cultivation in universities, and its quality directly determines that of the talent cultivation. However, the efficiency of online course resource allocation in universities of China is unacceptable, and the corresponding driving mechanisms are unclear. Based on the data of iCourses platform for a top university (H University) of China, this paper develops the DEA-Malmquist index and Tobit regression model to evaluate the efficiency of university online course resource allocation and explore its main influencing factors. The empirical results indicate that, first of all, humanities and social sciences outperform natural sciences in the resource allocation efficiency of online courses. Compared with non-national premium online courses, the resource investment redundancy of national premium online courses appears relatively lower. Secondly, from the perspective of temporal changes, the total factor productivity of online course resource allocation generally has a downward trend. The innovation effect of technological progress is more significant, while the catch-up effect of technical efficiency is clearly insufficient. Scale efficiency is the main factor hindering its improvement. Finally, in terms of the factors affecting the efficiency of online course resource allocation, teachers' research guidance capability, teaching research skills, and the number of courses offered have significantly positive impact.
课程是高校人才培养的核心要素,其质量直接决定人才培养的质量。然而,中国高校在线课程资源配置效率不尽如人意,相应的驱动机制也不明确。本文基于中国一所顶尖大学(H 大学)的 iCourses 平台数据,采用 DEA-Malmquist 指数和 Tobit 回归模型,评估了高校在线课程资源配置的效率,并探讨了其主要影响因素。实证结果表明:首先,人文社会科学在在线课程资源配置效率上优于自然科学。与非国家级精品在线课程相比,国家级精品在线课程的资源投入冗余度相对较低。其次,从时间变化的角度来看,在线课程资源配置的全要素生产率普遍呈下降趋势。技术进步的创新效应更为显著,而技术效率的追赶效应明显不足。规模效率是制约其提升的主要因素。最后,在影响在线课程资源配置效率的因素方面,教师的研究指导能力、教学研究技能和开设课程的数量具有显著的正向影响。