Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Federal Armed Forces Hospital, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Federal Armed Forces Hospital, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2024 Nov;52(11):1244-1258. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.08.014. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
The aim of this study was to determine whether implementing ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) elements/protocols improves outcomes in orthognathic surgery (OGS) compared to conventional care. To achieve this, ERAS-specific perioperative elements were identified and literature on ERAS for OGS was systematically reviewed. Using PRISMA methodology and GRADE approach, 44 studies with 49 perioperative care elements (13 pre-, 15 intra-, 21 postoperative) were analyzed. While 39 studies focused on single elements, only five presented multimodal protocols, with three related to ERAS. Preoperative elements included antimicrobial and steroid prophylaxis and prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Intraoperative aspects, especially anesthesiological, showed high evidence. Outcome parameters were heterogeneous: complications and postoperative pain were well-investigated with high evidence, while length of stay (LOS) and patient satisfaction received low to medium evidence. ICU LOS, healthcare costs, and readmission rates were underreported. The meta-analysis revealed significant results for pain reduction and trends towards fewer complications and shorter LOS in the ERAS group. Overall, ERAS protocols are not established in OMFS, particularly OGS. Further research is needed in pre- and postoperative care and standardized multimodal analgesia. The next step should be developing a comprehensive OGS protocol through a consensus conference and implementing it in clinical practice.
本研究旨在确定与传统护理相比,实施 ERAS(术后加速康复)要素/方案是否能改善正颌手术(OGS)的结果。为了实现这一目标,确定了 ERAS 特定的围手术期要素,并对 OGS 的 ERAS 文献进行了系统回顾。使用 PRISMA 方法和 GRADE 方法,分析了 44 项研究,共涉及 49 项围手术期护理要素(术前 13 项、术中 15 项、术后 21 项)。虽然 39 项研究集中于单个要素,但只有 5 项提出了多模式方案,其中 3 项与 ERAS 相关。术前要素包括抗菌和类固醇预防用药以及预防术后恶心和呕吐。术中方面,特别是麻醉学方面,具有较高的证据水平。结果参数具有异质性:并发症和术后疼痛的研究具有较高的证据水平,而住院时间(LOS)和患者满意度的研究则获得了低至中等的证据水平。ICU LOS、医疗保健成本和再入院率的报告不足。荟萃分析显示,ERAS 组在减轻疼痛方面有显著效果,并发症减少和 LOS 缩短的趋势明显。总体而言,ERAS 方案在口腔颌面外科,特别是 OGS 中尚未确立。需要进一步研究术前和术后护理以及标准化多模式镇痛。下一步应该通过共识会议制定全面的 OGS 方案,并在临床实践中实施。