Nicolì Pierpaolo, Biffi Anna, Boca Gregorio Del, Vitagliano Amerigo, Silvestris Erica, Loizzi Vera, Naro Edoardo Di, Cicinelli Ettore, Damiani Gianluca Raffaello
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leopldo Mandic Hospital, Merate, ASTT, Lecco, Italy.
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2024 Jul 18;13(3):161-167. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_50_23. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
In our previous article, we proposed the novel four-handed technique (FHT) for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), which, according to us, is more helpful compared to the traditional TLH route. The objectives of the study were to analyze the FHT-TLH feasibility and efficiency by comparing some surgical outcomes recorded from 750 FHT-TLH performed in our hospital to literature data about the traditional TLH route and to underline the great opportunity this novel technique offers to the young specialists and residents to be more confident with gynecological laparoscopy.
This was a retrospective analysis carried out by collecting data regarding patient characteristics and surgical outcomes (operative time, blood loss, surgical complications, use of analgesics, and length of hospitalization) from 750 hospital records of women who underwent FHT-TLH (with or without adnexectomy) due to benign or malignant pathology from January 2015 to December 2021 at our hospital.
We performed a total of 750 FHT-TLH, with or without adnexectomy. The mean skin-to-skin operative time for a FHT-TLH was 50 min, and the mean blood loss was 150 mL. No visceral damage was caused during surgeries. Only two patients underwent exploratory laparotomy with total abdominal hysterectomy due to the inability to proceed laparoscopically. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were administered only twice a day as analgesics, with advantage. The mean length of stay in the hospital after the procedure was 1.5 days, with discharge on the evening of the 1 day after surgery. No major postoperative complications occurred. The only minor postoperative complication described, in just three patients, was cellulitis of the vaginal vault.
Our FHT-TLH experience represents an alternative to the traditional TLH route, which allows to apply a minimally invasive approach with some advantages for patients compared to the traditional TLH route, such as early recovery and reduced operating time, blood loss, use of analgesics, and hospital stay. Moreover, it allows young specialists and residents to be more confident with gynecological laparoscopy, particularly when operating as the first assistant, to improve their laparoscopic surgical skills faster than the traditional TLH route allows them.
在我们之前的文章中,我们提出了用于全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)的新型四手技术(FHT),据我们所知,与传统的TLH路径相比,该技术更具优势。本研究的目的是通过比较我院750例FHT-TLH手术记录中的一些手术结果与传统TLH路径的文献数据,分析FHT-TLH的可行性和效率,并强调这项新技术为年轻专家和住院医师提供了一个很好的机会,使他们对妇科腹腔镜手术更有信心。
这是一项回顾性分析,收集了我院2015年1月至2021年12月因良性或恶性病变接受FHT-TLH(有或无附件切除术)的750例女性患者的病历资料,包括患者特征和手术结果(手术时间、失血量、手术并发症、镇痛药使用情况和住院时间)。
我们共进行了750例FHT-TLH手术,有或无附件切除术。FHT-TLH的平均皮肤到皮肤手术时间为50分钟,平均失血量为150毫升。手术过程中未造成内脏损伤。只有两名患者因无法进行腹腔镜手术而接受了剖腹探查及全腹子宫切除术。非甾体类抗炎药仅作为镇痛药每天使用两次,效果良好。术后平均住院时间为1.5天,术后第1天晚上出院。未发生重大术后并发症。仅3例患者出现的唯一轻微术后并发症是阴道穹窿蜂窝织炎。
我们的FHT-TLH经验是传统TLH路径的一种替代方法,与传统TLH路径相比,它允许采用微创方法,对患者具有一些优势,如早期恢复、缩短手术时间、减少失血量、减少镇痛药使用和缩短住院时间。此外,它使年轻专家和住院医师对妇科腹腔镜手术更有信心,特别是在作为第一助手操作时,能比传统TLH路径更快地提高他们的腹腔镜手术技能。