• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全腹腔镜子宫切除术联合淋巴结清扫术在子宫内膜癌手术治疗中的评估

Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers.

作者信息

Malinowski Andrzej, Majchrzak-Baczmańska Dominika, Pogoda Krzysztof, Maciołek-Blewniewska Grazyna, Antosiak Beata

机构信息

Department of Surgical and Endoscopic Gynecology Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

Ginekol Pol. 2013 Mar;84(3):197-205. doi: 10.17772/gp/1563.

DOI:10.17772/gp/1563
PMID:23700847
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with lymphadenectomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The retrospective study included 31 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent TLH with lymphadenectomy and 42 patients with endometrial cancer who were operated by laparotomy. In both groups the following parameters were analyzed: age, BMI, accompanying diseases, previous surgeries, parity duration of the surgery blood loss (complete blood count before and after the operation was compared), necessity of blood transfusion, length of hospital stay uterine volume, grade, stage of endometrial cancer (FIGO), and intra/ postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was lower in the laparoscopic group than in women operated by laparotomy: 54 and 64, respectively (p = 0.0001). There were no significant differences between both groups in BMI, uterine volume, grade, staging (FIGO), and parity The percentage of patients with accompanying chronic diseases in the TLH group was lower than in the laparotomy group: 48.39% and 83.34%, respectively (p = 0,032). There were no significant differences between both group in the history of previous laparotomies (p = 0.704). Mean duration of surgery was shorter in the case of laparotomy than in case of laparoscopy: 130.6 and 151.77, respectively (p = 0.003). Laparotomy was associated with greater blood loss during surgery Statistically significantly higher decrease in the Hb concentration and Hct values was noted in the group operated by laparotomy when compared to laparoscopy (mean values.: Hb-1.1 7 g/dl, Hct-3.49% for the TLH technique and Hb-7.8 g/dl Hct-5.47% for laparotomy; p = 0.011-Hb; p = 0.003-Hct). Mean hospital stay after laparoscopy was shorter than after laparotomy--4 and 9 days, respectively (p = 0,0001). The influence of the operational technique on the number of pelvic lymph nodes taken for histopathological examination was evaluated. No statistically significant correlation between the number of lymph nodes taken for histopathological examination during the surgery and the operational technique was noted (p = 0.083). Mean number of nodes taken for examination was 15 during the TLH surgery and 19 during laparotomy Postoperative complications were observed in 2 patients from the TLH and in 12 patients from the laparotomy groups (p = 0.038). The most statistically significantly frequent complication in the laparotomy group was postoperative wound infection: 8 (19.05%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer therapy is a safe and feasible procedure. It is characterized by significantly smaller percentage of complications and shorter hospital stay This technique offers an alternative for laparotomy when it is performed by a highly experienced surgeon.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)联合淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫内膜癌的疗效、可行性及安全性。

材料与方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了31例行TLH联合淋巴结清扫术的子宫内膜癌患者以及42例行开腹手术的子宫内膜癌患者。对两组患者的以下参数进行了分析:年龄、体重指数(BMI)、伴随疾病、既往手术史、产次、手术时长、失血量(比较手术前后的血常规)、输血必要性、住院时间、子宫体积、子宫内膜癌的分级、分期(国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期)以及术中/术后并发症。

结果

腹腔镜组患者的平均年龄低于开腹手术组患者,分别为54岁和64岁(p = 0.0001)。两组在BMI、子宫体积、分级、分期(FIGO)和产次方面无显著差异。TLH组伴有慢性病的患者百分比低于开腹手术组,分别为48.39%和83.34%(p = 0.032)。两组在既往开腹手术史方面无显著差异(p = 0.704)。开腹手术的平均手术时长比腹腔镜手术短,分别为130.6分钟和151.77分钟(p = 0.003)。开腹手术术中失血量更大。与腹腔镜手术相比,开腹手术组患者血红蛋白(Hb)浓度和红细胞压积(Hct)值的下降在统计学上显著更高(平均值:TLH技术组Hb - 1.17 g/dl,Hct - 3.49%;开腹手术组Hb - 7.8 g/dl,Hct - 5.47%;p = 0.011 - Hb;p = 0.003 - Hct)。腹腔镜手术后的平均住院时间比开腹手术短,分别为4天和9天(p = 0.0001)。评估了手术技术对用于组织病理学检查的盆腔淋巴结数量的影响。未发现手术中用于组织病理学检查的淋巴结数量与手术技术之间存在统计学上的显著相关性(p = 0.083)。TLH手术中平均送检淋巴结数量为15个,开腹手术中为19个。TLH组有2例患者出现术后并发症,开腹手术组有12例患者出现术后并发症(p = 0.038)。开腹手术组最常见的具有统计学显著意义的并发症是术后伤口感染:8例(19.05%)患者。

结论

全腹腔镜子宫切除术联合淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫内膜癌是一种安全可行的手术。其特点是并发症发生率显著更低,住院时间更短。当由经验丰富的外科医生进行时,该技术为开腹手术提供了一种替代方案。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers.全腹腔镜子宫切除术联合淋巴结清扫术在子宫内膜癌手术治疗中的评估
Ginekol Pol. 2013 Mar;84(3):197-205. doi: 10.17772/gp/1563.
2
A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.一项关于机器人辅助与开放手术子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性比较研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Feb;25(2):250-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000357.
3
Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.机器人辅助子宫切除术和淋巴结切除术的学习曲线和手术结果:与腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的病例对照比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.008.
4
Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌女性患者腹腔镜手术与传统手术的临床结局及并发症比较
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004 Jul;270(1):25-30. doi: 10.1007/s00404-003-0488-7. Epub 2003 May 1.
5
Total laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer compared with laparotomy.子宫内膜癌全腹腔镜改良根治性子宫切除术加淋巴结清扫术与开腹手术的比较
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Feb;40(2):570-5. doi: 10.1111/jog.12194. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
6
Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?肥胖子宫内膜癌女性的子宫切除术:腹腔镜手术还是开腹手术?
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Sep;78(3 Pt 1):329-35. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5914.
7
Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.通过传统剖腹术、标准腹腔镜检查和机器人技术进行子宫内膜癌分期的结果与成本比较。
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for surgical staging of patients with presumed low-risk endometrial cancer: The current state of Japan.腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术用于疑似低风险子宫内膜癌患者手术分期的比较:日本的现状
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;58(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.019.
9
Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌:一项随机对照试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):588.e1-588.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
10
Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer in aged patients: Experience from a tertiary referral center in Eastern China.老年患者子宫内膜癌的腹腔镜手术:来自中国东部一家三级转诊中心的经验
J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13(5):761-766. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_417_17.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, Robotic-Assisted, and Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy for Uterine and Cervical Cancers: A Systematic Review.腹腔镜子宫切除术、机器人辅助手术及腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术治疗子宫癌和宫颈癌的手术结果:一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 11;14(24):2782. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14242782.