• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单前网片腹腔镜或机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂患者后生活质量的改善:来自单一机构的回顾性分析

Improvement in Quality of Life after Laparoscopic or Robotic-assisted Sacrocolpopexy with a Single Anterior Mesh in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Institution.

作者信息

Kinouchi Riyo, Yoshida Kanako, Kawakita Takako, Yasui Toshiyuki, Iwasa Takeshi, Kato Takeshi

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Institute of Health Biosciences, Tokushima, Japan.

Department of Reproductive and Menopausal Medicine, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Institute of Health Biosciences, Tokushima, Japan.

出版信息

Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2024 Jul 18;13(3):168-173. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_19_23. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.4103/gmit.gmit_19_23
PMID:39184259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11343358/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a significant health-care problem for older women. We have treated POP surgically using laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) or robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC). The original LSC and RSC procedures were done with anterior and posterior meshes; however, the use of the single mesh procedure is increasing because of its simplicity and safety. There have been few reports about the change in quality of life (QOL) using the single mesh procedure. Therefore, the present study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the change in QOL by LSC and RSC using a single anterior mesh for women without posterior compartment prolapse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed LSC or RSC using a single anterior mesh in 52 patients who had POP without posterior vaginal wall prolapse between August 2018 and October 2022. We assessed the QOL before and after surgery using prolapse-QOL (P-QOL) questionnaires.

RESULTS

All patients who received LSC or RSC with a single anterior mesh left the hospital as scheduled without severe perioperative complications. There were no instances of wound infection or vaginal mesh extrusion. The recovery rate of questionnaires was 63.5% (33/52). All QOL score domains improved significantly, and there were no questionnaire parameters that worsened.

CONCLUSION

LSC or RSC using only a single anterior mesh improves P-QOL with a low incidence of surgical complications for POP patients who did not have posterior vaginal wall prolapse. LSC or RSC with a single anterior mesh may be a prospective new procedure for POP.

摘要

目的

盆腔器官脱垂(POP)是老年女性面临的一个重大医疗保健问题。我们采用腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术(LSC)或机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术(RSC)对POP进行手术治疗。最初的LSC和RSC手术使用前后补片;然而,由于其操作简单且安全,单补片手术的应用正在增加。关于使用单补片手术对生活质量(QOL)变化的报道很少。因此,本研究旨在回顾性评估对于无后盆腔脱垂的女性,使用单一前补片的LSC和RSC手术对QOL的影响。

材料与方法

2018年8月至2022年10月期间,我们对52例无阴道后壁脱垂的POP患者采用单一前补片进行LSC或RSC手术。我们使用脱垂生活质量(P-QOL)问卷评估手术前后的QOL。

结果

所有接受单一前补片LSC或RSC手术的患者均如期出院,无严重围手术期并发症。没有伤口感染或阴道补片外露的情况。问卷回收率为63.5%(33/52)。所有QOL评分领域均显著改善,且没有问卷参数恶化。

结论

对于无阴道后壁脱垂的POP患者,仅使用单一前补片的LSC或RSC手术可改善P-QOL,手术并发症发生率低。单一前补片的LSC或RSC手术可能是一种有前景的POP新术式。

相似文献

1
Improvement in Quality of Life after Laparoscopic or Robotic-assisted Sacrocolpopexy with a Single Anterior Mesh in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Institution.单前网片腹腔镜或机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂患者后生活质量的改善:来自单一机构的回顾性分析
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2024 Jul 18;13(3):168-173. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_19_23. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
2
Are Two Meshes Better than One in Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse? Comparison of Single Anterior versus Anterior and Posterior Vaginal Mesh Procedures.经阴道单平面与前后平面网片修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的对比研究:经阴道补片全盆腔重建术是否优于经阴道单平面修补术?
Urol Int. 2022;106(3):282-290. doi: 10.1159/000519818. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
3
Comparison of transvaginal mesh surgery and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.经阴道网片手术与机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的比较。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01702-z.
4
Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助和腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(6):449. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4347.
5
Quality of Life and Sexual Function after Laparoscopic Posterior Vaginal Plication Plus Sacral Colpopexy for Severe Posterior Vaginal Prolapse.腹腔镜下阴道后壁折叠术联合骶骨阴道固定术治疗严重阴道后壁脱垂后的生活质量和性功能
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 22;13(2):616. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020616.
6
Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.有子宫和无子宫的盆腔器官脱垂手术复发高风险患者术后1年的解剖学结局:一项比较腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术/宫颈固定术与阴道前路网状物的随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):545-555. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3702-7. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
7
A prospective randomized trial comparing Restorelle® Y mesh and flat mesh for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: 24-month outcomes.一项比较 Restorelle® Y 网片和平网片在腹腔镜和机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术中应用的前瞻性随机试验:24 个月的结果。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jun;32(6):1565-1570. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04657-y. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
8
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus pelvic organ prolapse suspension for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与盆腔器官脱垂悬吊术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的回顾性研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Aug;42(6):2075-2081. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.2021508. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
9
First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.首次比较两种单切口机器人骶骨阴道固定术的报告:使用达芬奇 Xi 或 Si 系统的单点和使用达芬奇 SP 系统的单端口。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;60(1):60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.10.007.
10
A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.腹腔镜和机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的现状综述。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.064. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Medium-Term Risk of Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse within 2-Year Follow-Up after Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术后2年随访期间盆腔器官脱垂复发的中期风险
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Feb 9;12(1):38-43. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_59_22. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
2
Robotic Sacrocolpopexy with Autologous Fascia Lata: A Case Series.自体阔筋膜机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术:病例系列
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Feb 9;12(1):10-14. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_7_22. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
3
Two-year anatomical and functional outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using light-weight Y shaped mesh for post hysterectomy vaginal prolapse.使用轻质Y形网片进行腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗子宫切除术后阴道脱垂的两年解剖学和功能结果
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Mar;270:139-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
Comparison of Surgical Results and Postoperative Recurrence Rates by Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Other Surgical Procedures for Managing Pelvic Organ Prolapse.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与其他治疗盆腔器官脱垂手术方法的手术结果及术后复发率比较
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021 Nov 5;10(4):221-225. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_127_20. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
5
Are Two Meshes Better than One in Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse? Comparison of Single Anterior versus Anterior and Posterior Vaginal Mesh Procedures.经阴道单平面与前后平面网片修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的对比研究:经阴道补片全盆腔重建术是否优于经阴道单平面修补术?
Urol Int. 2022;106(3):282-290. doi: 10.1159/000519818. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
6
Measures for Safe Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: Preoperative Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Perioperative Ultrasonography.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术安全措施:术前对比增强计算机断层扫描及围手术期超声检查
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021 Apr 30;10(2):114-116. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_1_20. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
7
Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助和腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(6):449. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4347.
8
Validation of the Malay version of the p-QOL questionnaire.马来语版 p-QOL 问卷的验证。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Dec;32(12):3163-3167. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04362-w. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
9
Laparoscopic posterior colporrhaphy using a unidirectional barbed suture for risk hedging laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.使用单向倒刺缝线进行腹腔镜后路阴道修补术以规避腹腔镜骶棘韧带固定术风险
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2017 Apr-Jun;6(2):96-97. doi: 10.1016/j.gmit.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
10
[CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 500 CASES FROM A SINGLE INSTITUTION].
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2017;108(3):137-144. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.108.137.