Liu Dave Tik Fung, Misra Rahul, Moore Thomas
Oncology, Kent Oncology Centre, Kent, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 24;16(7):e65238. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65238. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Introduction Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being the most common type. More than half of patients require radiotherapy throughout their treatment. Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is an important tool for symptom control and quality of life improvement in advanced NSCLC patients. However, the benefits of PRT must be balanced against possible disadvantages, especially in end-of-life (EOL) care. This study aims to describe the profile of PRT-treated deceased NSCLC patients, quantify the proportion of PRT recipients in the last 30 days of life and identify short-term survival prognostic factors in this group. Materials and methods This retrospective analysis was performed at two radiotherapy facilities within the Kent Oncology Centre, UK, for two years, running from January 1, 2022, to January 1, 2024. Data were collected from 857 deceased NSCLC patients who received PRT. Demographics, cancer diagnosis, histology, tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) staging, radiotherapy details, recent treatments, performance status (PS) and comorbidities were analysed. Patients have been stratified as long-term survivors (more than 30 days after PRT initiation, LTS group) along with short-term survivors (STS) (died within 30 days, STS group). Descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, t-tests and multivariable logistic regression have been used in the data analysis. Results Out of 857 patients, 148 (17.3%) died within 30 days of PRT initiation. PS was considerably worse (p = 0.027), Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE-27) scores were higher (p = 0.018), and metastatic disease was more prevalent (60.1% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.02) in STS group patients. Fewer patients in the STS group completed their treatment compared to the LTS group (63.5% vs. 82.8%, p < 0.001). The STS group also received lower mean radiation dose (17.7 Gy vs. 19.6 Gy, p = 0.022) and fewer fractions (4.4 vs. 5.2, p = 0.019). The most common RT regimen in both cohorts was 20 Gy in five fractions, used in 55.4% of STS and 49.8% of LTS patients, with no significant difference in single fraction RT use between groups (33.1% in STS vs. 36.8% in LTS, p = 0.401). Multivariate logistic regression identified significant predictors of 30-day mortality: poorer PS (adjusted OR: 1.981, 95% CI: 1.33-3.12, p = 0.001), metastatic disease (adjusted OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.246-3.571, p = 0.002), incomplete PRT (adjusted OR: 0.337, 95% CI: 0.21-0.514, p < 0.001) and no recent chemotherapy (adjusted OR: 0.542, 95% CI: 0.342-0.941, p = 0.044). Conclusion This study demonstrated that compared with previous reports, a higher proportion of NSCLC patients who received PRT died within 30 days of treatment initiation, and low treatment adherence rates highlight challenges in EOL settings. Identification of poor PS and metastatic disease as predictors of short-term mortality would help inform PRT decision-making. The underutilisation of single-fraction radiotherapy and the link between recent chemotherapy and lower 30-day mortality warrant further study. These results highlight the need for better prognostic tools and more selective use of PRT, including increased consideration of single-fraction radiotherapy, in NSCLC patients approaching end of life and emphasise the importance of balancing benefit against treatment burden in this vulnerable population.
引言
肺癌是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)是最常见的类型。超过一半的患者在整个治疗过程中需要放疗。姑息性放疗(PRT)是晚期NSCLC患者控制症状和改善生活质量的重要工具。然而,PRT的益处必须与可能的缺点相权衡,尤其是在临终(EOL)护理中。本研究旨在描述接受PRT治疗的已故NSCLC患者的概况,量化生命最后30天接受PRT患者的比例,并确定该组患者的短期生存预后因素。
材料与方法
本回顾性分析在英国肯特肿瘤中心的两个放疗机构进行,为期两年,从2022年1月1日至2024年1月1日。收集了857例接受PRT治疗的已故NSCLC患者的数据。分析了人口统计学、癌症诊断、组织学、肿瘤、淋巴结、转移(TNM)分期、放疗细节、近期治疗、体能状态(PS)和合并症。患者被分为长期幸存者(PRT开始后超过30天,LTS组)和短期幸存者(STS)(在30天内死亡,STS组)。数据分析中使用了描述性统计、卡方检验、t检验和多变量逻辑回归。
结果
在857例患者中,148例(17.3%)在PRT开始后30天内死亡。STS组患者的PS明显更差(p = 0.027),成人合并症评估27(ACE - 27)评分更高(p = 0.018),转移性疾病更普遍(60.1%对47.5%,p = 0.02)。与LTS组相比,STS组完成治疗的患者更少(63.5%对82.8%,p < 0.001)。STS组接受的平均辐射剂量也更低(17.7 Gy对19.6 Gy,p = 0.022),分割次数更少(4.4次对5.2次,p = 0.019)。两个队列中最常见的放疗方案是5次分割20 Gy,STS组55.4%的患者和LTS组49.8%的患者使用该方案,两组单次分割放疗的使用无显著差异(STS组为33.1%,LTS组为36.8%,p = 0.401)。多变量逻辑回归确定了30天死亡率的显著预测因素:较差的PS(调整后OR:1.981,95%CI:1.33 - 3.12,p = 0.001)、转移性疾病(调整后OR:2.02,95%CI:1.246 - 3.571,p = 0.002)、未完成PRT(调整后OR:0.337,95%CI:0.21 - 0.514,p < 0.001)和近期未进行化疗(调整后OR:0.542,95%CI:0.342 - 0.941,p = 0.044)。
结论
本研究表明,与之前的报告相比,接受PRT治疗的NSCLC患者在治疗开始后30天内死亡的比例更高,低治疗依从率凸显了临终环境中的挑战。将较差的PS和转移性疾病确定为短期死亡率的预测因素将有助于为PRT决策提供信息。单次分割放疗的未充分利用以及近期化疗与较低的30天死亡率之间的联系值得进一步研究。这些结果强调了在接近生命末期的NSCLC患者中需要更好的预后工具和更有选择性地使用PRT,包括更多地考虑单次分割放疗,并强调在这一脆弱人群中平衡益处与治疗负担的重要性。