Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术后的切口感染:单中心审计与文献综述

Patch Infection Following Carotid Endarterectomy: A Single-Center Audit and Literature Review.

作者信息

Roditis Konstantinos, Tzamtzidou Sofia, Maltezos Konstantinos, Antoniou Afroditi, Giannakopoulos Nikolaos, Tsiantoula Paraskevi, Papas Theofanis

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Korgialenio-Benakio Hellenic Red Cross Hospital, Athens, GRC.

Department of Vascular Surgery, KAT Attica General Hospital, Athens, GRC.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 26;16(7):e65420. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65420. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a surgical procedure that carries a rare but serious risk of patch infection. This study examines the management and outcomes of patch infections in CEA patients treated in our department over 23 years. A literature review of studies on prosthetic patch infection following CEA published from January 1992 up to December 31, 2022 was also carried out.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective audit of patients who underwent CEA in a hospital in Athens, Greece, between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2022.

RESULTS

Between January 1999 and December 2022, we treated seven patients with carotid patch infections who had their original CEA at our department. and were the most common infecting organisms. One patient (14%) died from hemorrhagic shock before surgery, while the remaining six (86%) underwent debridement, patch excision, and great saphenous vein patching. No peri-operative deaths or strokes occurred, and there were no re-infections during a median follow-up of 159 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Excision of infected material followed by revascularization using a vein graft remains the prevailing treatment.

摘要

引言

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)是一种手术操作,存在罕见但严重的补片感染风险。本研究调查了我院23年来接受治疗的CEA患者补片感染的处理方法及结果。我们还对1992年1月至2022年12月31日发表的关于CEA术后人工补片感染的研究进行了文献综述。

方法

我们对1999年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间在希腊雅典一家医院接受CEA手术的患者进行了回顾性审计。

结果

1999年1月至2022年12月期间,我们治疗了7例在我院接受初次CEA手术并发颈动脉补片感染的患者。 和 是最常见的感染病原体。1例患者(14%)在手术前死于失血性休克,其余6例(86%)接受了清创、补片切除和大隐静脉修补术。围手术期无死亡或卒中发生,在中位随访159个月期间无再感染发生。

结论

切除感染组织后使用静脉移植物进行血管重建仍然是主要的治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d6/11344968/b31c516e45c8/cureus-0016-00000065420-i01.jpg

相似文献

4
Bilateral Carotid Patch Infection Occurring 12 years Following Endarterectomy.内膜切除术12年后发生双侧颈动脉补片感染
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 May;65:285.e11-285.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
5
Prosthetic patch infection after carotid endarterectomy.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002 Jan;23(1):11-6. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1539.
6
Postoperative infection associated with polyester patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy.
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Aug;38(2):251-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00122-8.
7
Late Dacron Patch Inflammatory Reaction after Carotid Endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后晚期涤纶补片炎性反应
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Oct;54(4):423-429. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Hybrid Repair of Infected Carotid Patch.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 May;63(5):767. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
3
Bilateral Carotid Patch Infection Occurring 12 years Following Endarterectomy.内膜切除术12年后发生双侧颈动脉补片感染
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 May;65:285.e11-285.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
4
Recurrent pseudoaneurysm after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后复发性假性动脉瘤
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2019 Apr 28;5(2):128-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2018.12.010. eCollection 2019 Jun.
8
Late Dacron Patch Inflammatory Reaction after Carotid Endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后晚期涤纶补片炎性反应
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Oct;54(4):423-429. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验