• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉内膜切除术后的切口感染:单中心审计与文献综述

Patch Infection Following Carotid Endarterectomy: A Single-Center Audit and Literature Review.

作者信息

Roditis Konstantinos, Tzamtzidou Sofia, Maltezos Konstantinos, Antoniou Afroditi, Giannakopoulos Nikolaos, Tsiantoula Paraskevi, Papas Theofanis

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Korgialenio-Benakio Hellenic Red Cross Hospital, Athens, GRC.

Department of Vascular Surgery, KAT Attica General Hospital, Athens, GRC.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 26;16(7):e65420. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65420. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.65420
PMID:39184741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11344968/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a surgical procedure that carries a rare but serious risk of patch infection. This study examines the management and outcomes of patch infections in CEA patients treated in our department over 23 years. A literature review of studies on prosthetic patch infection following CEA published from January 1992 up to December 31, 2022 was also carried out.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective audit of patients who underwent CEA in a hospital in Athens, Greece, between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2022.

RESULTS

Between January 1999 and December 2022, we treated seven patients with carotid patch infections who had their original CEA at our department. and were the most common infecting organisms. One patient (14%) died from hemorrhagic shock before surgery, while the remaining six (86%) underwent debridement, patch excision, and great saphenous vein patching. No peri-operative deaths or strokes occurred, and there were no re-infections during a median follow-up of 159 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Excision of infected material followed by revascularization using a vein graft remains the prevailing treatment.

摘要

引言

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)是一种手术操作,存在罕见但严重的补片感染风险。本研究调查了我院23年来接受治疗的CEA患者补片感染的处理方法及结果。我们还对1992年1月至2022年12月31日发表的关于CEA术后人工补片感染的研究进行了文献综述。

方法

我们对1999年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间在希腊雅典一家医院接受CEA手术的患者进行了回顾性审计。

结果

1999年1月至2022年12月期间,我们治疗了7例在我院接受初次CEA手术并发颈动脉补片感染的患者。 和 是最常见的感染病原体。1例患者(14%)在手术前死于失血性休克,其余6例(86%)接受了清创、补片切除和大隐静脉修补术。围手术期无死亡或卒中发生,在中位随访159个月期间无再感染发生。

结论

切除感染组织后使用静脉移植物进行血管重建仍然是主要的治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d6/11344968/1cd93671b6dc/cureus-0016-00000065420-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d6/11344968/b31c516e45c8/cureus-0016-00000065420-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d6/11344968/b85903cb3537/cureus-0016-00000065420-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d6/11344968/1cd93671b6dc/cureus-0016-00000065420-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d6/11344968/b31c516e45c8/cureus-0016-00000065420-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d6/11344968/b85903cb3537/cureus-0016-00000065420-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d6/11344968/1cd93671b6dc/cureus-0016-00000065420-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Patch Infection Following Carotid Endarterectomy: A Single-Center Audit and Literature Review.颈动脉内膜切除术后的切口感染:单中心审计与文献综述
Cureus. 2024 Jul 26;16(7):e65420. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65420. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Management and outcome of prosthetic patch infection after carotid endarterectomy: a single-centre series and systematic review of the literature.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后人工补片感染的管理和结局:单中心系列和文献系统评价。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Jul;44(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.04.025. Epub 2012 May 20.
3
Management of patch infections after carotid endarterectomy and utility of femoral vein interposition bypass graft.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后补片感染的处理和股静脉间置旁路移植术的应用。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1815-1823.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
4
Bilateral Carotid Patch Infection Occurring 12 years Following Endarterectomy.内膜切除术12年后发生双侧颈动脉补片感染
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 May;65:285.e11-285.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
5
Prosthetic patch infection after carotid endarterectomy.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002 Jan;23(1):11-6. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1539.
6
Postoperative infection associated with polyester patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy.
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Aug;38(2):251-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00122-8.
7
Late Dacron Patch Inflammatory Reaction after Carotid Endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后晚期涤纶补片炎性反应
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Oct;54(4):423-429. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
8
Carotid endarterectomy outcome with vein or Dacron graft patch angioplasty and internal carotid artery shortening.采用静脉或涤纶补片血管成形术及颈内动脉缩短术的颈动脉内膜切除术的结果
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Apr;29(4):654-64. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70311-3.
9
Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Carotid Endarterectomy at a Single Institution.单中心颈动脉血运重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的结果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73:329-335. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.10.023. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
10
Reoperations for carotid artery stenosis: role of primary and secondary reconstructions.颈动脉狭窄的再次手术:一期和二期重建的作用
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Mar;33(3):495-503. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.111730.

本文引用的文献

1
Hybrid Repair of Infected Carotid Patch.感染性颈动脉补片的杂交修复术
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 May;63(5):767. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
Conservative Surgical Management of Late Carotid Patch Infection in a Patient with Subsequent Stenting for Restenosis.患者曾因颈动脉晚期补片感染接受保守手术治疗,随后因再狭窄行支架置入术。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2022 Jan;56(1):112-116. doi: 10.1177/15385744211043329. Epub 2021 Oct 3.
3
Bilateral Carotid Patch Infection Occurring 12 years Following Endarterectomy.
内膜切除术12年后发生双侧颈动脉补片感染
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 May;65:285.e11-285.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
4
Recurrent pseudoaneurysm after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后复发性假性动脉瘤
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2019 Apr 28;5(2):128-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2018.12.010. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
Management of patch infections after carotid endarterectomy and utility of femoral vein interposition bypass graft.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后补片感染的处理和股静脉间置旁路移植术的应用。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1815-1823.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
6
Septic Carotid Endarterectomy Patch as a Result of Preoperative Tooth Extraction.术前拔牙导致的感染性颈动脉内膜切除术补片
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;50:299.e1-299.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.01.085. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
7
Management challenges of late presentation Dacron patch infection after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后涤纶补片晚期感染的管理挑战
BMJ Case Rep. 2017 Oct 19;2017:bcr-2017-221541. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-221541.
8
Late Dacron Patch Inflammatory Reaction after Carotid Endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后晚期涤纶补片炎性反应
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Oct;54(4):423-429. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
9
Editor's Choice - Long-term Outcome After EndoVAC Hybrid Repair of Infected Vascular Reconstructions.编辑精选 - 感染性血管重建后使用 EndoVAC 杂交修复的长期结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 May;51(5):724-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
10
Infected pseudoaneurysm after carotid endarterectomy: mismatch between clinical presentation and origin.颈动脉内膜切除术后感染性假性动脉瘤:临床表现与起源不匹配。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;28(3):740.e17-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Oct 26.