Zhou Ryan W, Sangam Kamala, Budhram Adrian
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (RWZ, KS, AB); and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (AB), Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Dec;14(6):e200350. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200350. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
To identify indicators of false pleocytosis in adults with traumatic lumbar puncture (LP), and determine specificities and sensitivities of commonly used CSF correction factors.
Adults who underwent 4-tube CSF collection were reviewed. Study inclusion required elevated tube 1 red blood cell (RBC) count, tube 1 pleocytosis, and normalized tube 4 RBC count. Tube 4 white blood cell (WBC) count served as the reference standard. Specificities and sensitivities of 3 correction factors (1 WBC:500 RBC, 1 WBC:1000 RBC, and 1 WBC:1500 RBC) were calculated.
One hundred ninety-five adults were included. Among them, 106 (54%) had false tube 1 pleocytosis; these patients had a significantly higher median CSF RBC count and lower median CSF WBC count than those with true tube 1 pleocytosis. Specificities and sensitivities of correction factors ranged from 71.7% to 29.2% and 84.3% to 97.8%, respectively; 1 WBC:500 RBC had highest specificity for pleocytosis, while 1 WBC:1500 RBC had highest sensitivity. Irrespective of correction factor used, false-positive and false-negative determinations of pleocytosis were usually mild (≤20 WBCs/μL).
Indicators of false pleocytosis in adults with traumatic LP include bloodier CSF and milder pleocytosis, suggesting that correction factors are most useful in such cases. Across correction factors, an expected specificity/sensitivity tradeoff is observed. Corrected CSF WBC counts suggesting only mild pleocytosis should be interpreted cautiously.
确定成人创伤性腰椎穿刺(LP)时假性细胞增多症的指标,并确定常用脑脊液校正因子的特异性和敏感性。
回顾接受4管脑脊液采集的成人患者。纳入研究要求第1管红细胞(RBC)计数升高、第1管细胞增多以及第4管RBC计数正常化。第4管白细胞(WBC)计数作为参考标准。计算3种校正因子(1个WBC:500个RBC、1个WBC:1000个RBC和1个WBC:1500个RBC)的特异性和敏感性。
纳入195名成人。其中,106名(54%)存在第1管假性细胞增多症;这些患者的脑脊液RBC计数中位数显著高于真正第1管细胞增多症的患者,脑脊液WBC计数中位数则更低。校正因子的特异性和敏感性分别为71.7%至29.2%和84.3%至97.8%;1个WBC:500个RBC对细胞增多症的特异性最高,而1个WBC:1500个RBC的敏感性最高。无论使用何种校正因子,细胞增多症的假阳性和假阴性判定通常较轻(≤20个WBCs/μL)。
成人创伤性LP时假性细胞增多症的指标包括脑脊液含血量更高和细胞增多症较轻,这表明校正因子在此类病例中最有用。在各种校正因子中,观察到预期的特异性/敏感性权衡。提示仅为轻度细胞增多症的校正后脑脊液WBC计数应谨慎解释。