Sommer Marianne, Arni Caroline, Müller-Wille Staffan, Teuscher Simon
University of Lucerne, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Switzerland.
Hist Human Sci. 2024 Jul 21;37(3-4):3-15. doi: 10.1177/09526951241261837. eCollection 2024 Jul-Oct.
The preferred tool for conceptualizing, determining, and claiming relations of kinship, ancestry, and descent among humans are diagrams. For this reason, and at the same time to avoid a reduction to biology as transported by terms such as , , and , we introduce the expression . We seek to understand the enormous influence that especially tree diagrams have had as a way to express and engage with human relatedness, but hold that this success can only be adequately understood by attending to what in fact are broader diagrammatic practices. These practices bring to light that diagrams of relatedness do not simply make visible natural connections, but create or deny relations in particular ways and for particular reasons. In this special section, contributors investigate diagrams of relatedness in genealogy, heredity, as well as biological and social anthropology. Conceiving of diagrams as techniques that transcend such binaries as 'thought and action' and 'image and text', we aim at an understanding of how they were constructed and how they functioned in particular epistemic, cultural, and political contexts.
用于概念化、确定和主张人类之间亲属关系、祖先关系和世系关系的首选工具是图表。出于这个原因,同时为了避免像“血统”“遗传”和“世系”等术语所传达的那种简化为生物学概念的情况,我们引入了“亲属关系图表”这一表述。我们试图理解尤其是树形图作为一种表达和处理人类关联性的方式所产生的巨大影响,但认为只有关注实际上更广泛的图表实践,才能充分理解这种成功。这些实践揭示出,关联性图表并非简单地使自然联系变得可见,而是以特定方式并出于特定原因创造或否定关系。在这个特别版块中,撰稿人研究了家谱学、遗传学以及生物和社会人类学中的关联性图表。将图表视为超越“思想与行动”以及“图像与文本”等二元对立的技术,我们旨在理解它们是如何构建的,以及它们在特定的认知、文化和政治背景中是如何发挥作用的。