Akram Salman, Nanji Imaan, Deniz Ismail, Akram Faisal, Mukhtar Fahad
From the Saint Elizabeths Hospital, Psychiatry Residency Training Program, Washington, DC.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular Biology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
J ECT. 2025 Jun 1;41(2):77-83. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000001064. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective therapy for acute treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the efficacy and optimal strategy of delivering maintenance rTMS beyond acute treatment remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to quantify the treatment effect of maintenance rTMS therapy in MDD and compares the difference in treatment effect between the fixed and rescue maintenance rTMS protocols. We conducted a meta-analysis of 14 studies (N = 705) comparing depression rating scores before and after maintenance rTMS. Standardized mean scores adjusted for sample size (Hedges g ) were used as the effect size. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare the fixed and rescue maintenance rTMS treatment. Maintenance rTMS was associated with a statistically significant improvement in depression scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.75; confidence interval [CI] = -1.25 to -0.25). The random effects model had the Q value = 142.67 ( P < 0.0001) and I2 = 90%, supporting significant heterogeneity among studies. The prediction interval yielded a possible effect size from -2.54 to 1.05. The subgroup analysis showed a stronger treatment effect for rescue maintenance protocol (SMD = -1.17; CI = -2.13 to -0.21) compared to fixed maintenance protocol (SMD = -0.45; CI = -1.00.16). Although not statistically significant (Q-between = 2.56, df-between = 1, P = 0.1096), a large difference in effect size was observed between subgroups. Maintenance rTMS appears to be an effective strategy for maintaining remission and preventing relapse in MDD. Significant heterogeneity among the studies warrants caution in interpreting the results. These findings suggest the need for standard protocols and consensus guidelines for the optimal delivery of maintenance rTMS treatment.
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是重度抑郁症(MDD)急性治疗的有效疗法。然而,在急性治疗之外进行维持性rTMS治疗的疗效和最佳策略仍不明确。本荟萃分析旨在量化维持性rTMS治疗MDD的治疗效果,并比较固定和挽救性维持rTMS方案在治疗效果上的差异。我们对14项研究(N = 705)进行了荟萃分析,比较了维持性rTMS治疗前后的抑郁评分。以样本量调整后的标准化均数(Hedges g)作为效应量。进行亚组分析以比较固定和挽救性维持rTMS治疗。维持性rTMS与抑郁评分的统计学显著改善相关(标准化均数差[SMD]= 0.75;置信区间[CI]= -1.25至-0.25)。随机效应模型的Q值= 142.67(P <0.0001),I2 = 90%,支持研究间存在显著异质性。预测区间得出的可能效应量为-2.54至1.05。亚组分析显示,与固定维持方案(SMD = -0.45;CI = -1.00至-0.16)相比,挽救性维持方案的治疗效果更强(SMD = -1.17;CI = -2.13至-0.21)。尽管差异无统计学意义(组间Q = 2.56,组间自由度= 1,P = 0.1096),但亚组间效应量存在较大差异。维持性rTMS似乎是维持MDD缓解和预防复发的有效策略。研究间的显著异质性值得在解释结果时谨慎对待。这些发现表明,需要制定标准方案和共识指南,以实现维持性rTMS治疗的最佳应用。