Berman L, de Lacey G, Twomey E, Twomey B, Welch T, Eban R
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Feb 9;290(6466):421-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6466.421.
The assessments by radiographers of 1628 consecutive patients referred for radiography in the casualty department were analysed. The radiographers missed abnormalities in the radiographs in 68 of the cases. Casualty officers missed abnormalities in 63 cases, but only 35 patients were common to both groups. Twenty eight of the radiographs interpreted wrongly by casualty officers were interpreted correctly by radiographers; 16 of these 28 were thought by the accident and emergency consultant to be clinically important. It is suggested that a system whereby radiographers signal abnormalities should be standard practice.
对在急诊科接受X光检查的1628例连续患者的X光技师评估结果进行了分析。X光技师在68例病例的X光片中漏诊了异常情况。急诊科医生在63例病例中漏诊了异常情况,但两组中只有35例患者是相同的。急诊科医生误判的28张X光片经X光技师正确解读;事故与急救顾问认为这28张中的16张在临床上具有重要意义。建议采用一种X光技师标记异常情况的系统作为标准做法。