Suppr超能文献

缺血修饰白蛋白在子痫前期发生发展中临床预警价值的初步探讨

[Preliminary exploration of the clinical warning value of ischemic modified albumin in the development of pre-eclampsia].

作者信息

Shi J M, Li F Q, Yang Z, Liang H L, Han Y W, Zhang H D, Wang S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Haidian District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Beijing 100080, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 25;59(8):583-590. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20240415-00218.

Abstract

To explore the clinical warning value of ischemic modified albumin (IMA) and IMA to human serum albumin (HSA) ratio (IMAR) in the development of pre-eclampsia (PE) and its severity. A total of 156 pregnant women with PE admitted to the Haidian District Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Beijing from April 2022 to March 2023 were collected as the PE group, and 156 healthy pregnant women with the same age and gestational age were matched as the control group. PE pregnant women were further divided into severe PE group (78 cases) and non-severe PE group (78 cases). Severe PE pregnant women were divided into emergency group (42 cases) and non-emergency group (36 cases) according to the disease progression time.All pregnant women were stratified according to their HSA levels (<30 g/L, 30-32 g/L, ≥32 g/L), and the peripheral blood IMA, HSA, and IMAR of pregnant women in different periods and subgroups were compared, and also the difference of IMA levels in umbilical artery blood. Bivariate correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between severe PE and IMA or IMAR, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was used to analyze the diagnostic value of IMA, HSA, and IMAR for PE and severe PE. (1) The IMA level and IMAR in peripheral serum of pregnant women in the PE group at diagnosis, and the IMA level in umbilical artery blood at delivery, and peripheral serum at 2 days after delivery were higher than those in the control group. The HSA level in peripheral serum was lower than that in the control group at diagnosis, and the differences were statistically significant (all <0.001). (2) The IMA level and IMAR in the peripheral serum of pregnant women with severe PE were higher than those in the non-severe PE group at diagnosis, while the HSA level were lower than those in the non-severe PE group. The differences were statistically significant (all <0.05). At diagnosis, the IMA level and IMAR in peripheral serum of pregnant women in the emergency group were higher than those in the non-emergency group, while the HSA level was lower than that in the non-emergency group. The differences were statistically significant (all <0.05). When diagnosed, the peripheral serum IMA levels of pregnant women in the PE group were compared between subgroups with HSA<30 g/L, 30-32 g/L, ≥32 g/L, and there was no statistically significant difference (=0.366, =0.694). However, the IMAR was compared between the three subgroups, and the difference was statistically significant (=28.544, <0.001), which increased with the decrease of HSA levels. In the subgroup with HSA≥32 g/L, the peripheral serum IMA level and IMAR of pregnant women in the PE group were higher than those in the control group at diagnosis, and the differences were statistically significant (all <0.001). (3) The severe PE manifestations positively correlated with peripheral serum IMAR at diagnosis include systolic blood pressure (=0.279), mean arterial pressure (=0.212), and urinary protein quantification (=0.277), while the severe PE manifestations negatively correlated include HSA levels (=-0.644) and newborn birth weight (=-0.305), all of which were significantly correlated (<0.05). (4) The area under curve (AUC) for IMAR diagnosis of PE was 0.875 (95%: 0.833-0.916), with the highest diagnostic efficiency at a cutoff value of 2.06, sensitivity of 72.5%, and specificity of 85.1%. The AUC for diagnosing severe PE was 0.871 (95%: 0.822-0.919), with the highest diagnostic efficacy at a cutoff value of 2.18, sensitivity of 72.3%, and specificity of 88.3%. The diagnostic efficacy of IMAR for PE and severe PE were higher than those of IMA and HSA levels. The level of IMA and IMAR in pregnant women with PE are higher than those in normal pregnant women. IMA and IMAR are correlated with the severity of PE, with IMAR changes occurring earlier and more significantly. IMAR could be considered as one of the evaluation indicators for the development of PE, or as a more sensitive PE severity warning indicator than HSA.

摘要

探讨缺血修饰白蛋白(IMA)及其与人血清白蛋白(HSA)比值(IMAR)在子痫前期(PE)发生发展及其严重程度中的临床预警价值。收集2022年4月至2023年3月在北京海淀区妇幼保健院收治的156例PE孕妇作为PE组,选取156例年龄及孕周匹配的健康孕妇作为对照组。将PE孕妇进一步分为重度PE组(78例)和非重度PE组(78例)。根据病情进展时间将重度PE孕妇分为急诊组(42例)和非急诊组(36例)。所有孕妇根据其HSA水平(<30 g/L、30 - 32 g/L、≥32 g/L)进行分层,比较不同时期及亚组孕妇外周血IMA、HSA及IMAR,以及脐动脉血中IMA水平。采用双变量相关性分析探讨重度PE与IMA或IMAR之间的相关性,采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析IMA、HSA及IMAR对PE及重度PE的诊断价值。(1)PE组孕妇诊断时外周血清IMA水平及IMAR、分娩时脐动脉血IMA水平及产后2天外周血清IMA水平均高于对照组。诊断时外周血清HSA水平低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均<0.001)。(2)重度PE孕妇诊断时外周血清IMA水平及IMAR高于非重度PE组,而HSA水平低于非重度PE组。差异有统计学意义(均<0.05)。诊断时,急诊组孕妇外周血清IMA水平及IMAR高于非急诊组,而HSA水平低于非急诊组。差异有统计学意义(均<0.05)。诊断时,比较PE组孕妇外周血清IMA水平在HSA<30 g/L、30 - 32 g/L、≥32 g/L亚组间,差异无统计学意义(=0.366,=0.694)。但比较三个亚组间的IMAR,差异有统计学意义(=28.544,<0.001),且随HSA水平降低而升高。在HSA≥32 g/L亚组中,PE组孕妇诊断时外周血清IMA水平及IMAR高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(均<0.001)。(3)诊断时重度PE表现与外周血清IMAR呈正相关的包括收缩压(=0.279)、平均动脉压(=0.212)及尿蛋白定量(=0.277),呈负相关的包括HSA水平(=-0.644)及新生儿出生体重(=-0.305),均有显著相关性(<0.05)。(4)IMAR诊断PE的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.875(95%:0.833 - 0.916),截断值为2.06时诊断效率最高,灵敏度为72.5%,特异度为85.1%。诊断重度PE的AUC为0.871(95%:0.822 - 0.919),截断值为2.18时诊断效能最高,灵敏度为72.3%,特异度为88.3%。IMAR对PE及重度PE的诊断效能高于IMA及HSA水平。PE孕妇IMA及IMAR水平高于正常孕妇。IMA及IMAR与PE严重程度相关,其中IMAR变化更早且更显著。IMAR可作为PE发生发展的评估指标之一,或作为比HSA更敏感的PE严重程度预警指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验