Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Center for Clinical Research Dalarna, Uppsala University, Falun, Sweden.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Nov;59(11):1601-1610. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02397-x. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
The most widely used conditioning regimens in autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple sclerosis (MS) are BEAM with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and high-dose cyclophosphamide with ATG (Cy/ATG). In this retrospective study, we compare efficacy and safety of these regimens when used for relapsing-remitting MS. We assessed 231 patients treated in Sweden before January 1, 2020. The final cohort comprised 33 patients treated with BEAM/ATG and 141 with Cy/ATG. Prospectively collected data from the Swedish MS registry were used for efficacy, and electronic health records for procedure-related safety. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of 'no evidence of disease activity' (NEDA) at 5 years was 81% (CI 68-96%) with BEAM/ATG and 71% (CI 63-80%) with Cy/ATG, p = 0.29. Severe adverse events were more common with BEAM/ATG, mean 3.1 vs 1.4 per patient, p = <0.001. Febrile neutropaenia occurred in 88% of BEAM/ATG patients and 68% of Cy/ATG patients, p = 0.023. Average hospitalisation was 3.0 days longer in BEAM/ATG patients from day of stem-cell infusion, p < 0.001. While both regimens showed similar efficacy, BEAM/ATG was associated with more severe adverse events and prolonged hospitalisation. In the absence of randomised controlled trials, Cy/ATG may be preferable for ASCT in patients with relapsing-remitting MS due to its favourable safety profile.
最常用于多发性硬化症(MS)自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT)的预处理方案是 BEAM 联合抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)和高剂量环磷酰胺联合 ATG(Cy/ATG)。在这项回顾性研究中,我们比较了这两种方案治疗复发性 MS 的疗效和安全性。我们评估了 2020 年 1 月 1 日前在瑞典接受治疗的 231 名患者。最终队列包括 33 名接受 BEAM/ATG 治疗的患者和 141 名接受 Cy/ATG 治疗的患者。从瑞典 MS 登记处前瞻性收集的数据用于评估疗效,从电子病历中获取与治疗相关的安全性数据。Kaplan-Meier 估计 BEAM/ATG 组和 Cy/ATG 组的 5 年无疾病活动证据(NEDA)率分别为 81%(置信区间 68-96%)和 71%(置信区间 63-80%),p=0.29。BEAM/ATG 组严重不良事件更为常见,平均每位患者发生 3.1 次,而 Cy/ATG 组为 1.4 次,p<0.001。BEAM/ATG 组中 88%的患者和 Cy/ATG 组中 68%的患者发生发热性中性粒细胞减少症,p=0.023。从干细胞输注日开始,BEAM/ATG 组的平均住院时间延长了 3.0 天,p<0.001。虽然两种方案的疗效相似,但 BEAM/ATG 方案与更严重的不良事件和更长的住院时间相关。在没有随机对照试验的情况下,由于 Cy/ATG 方案具有良好的安全性,因此对于复发性 MS 患者的 ASCT 可能是首选。