Tanimoto Anna S, Richter Anne, Bujacz Aleksandra, Lindfors Petra
Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Scand J Psychol. 2025 Feb;66(1):85-97. doi: 10.1111/sjop.13064. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
Job insecurity is a work stressor associated with various health-related impairments. As concerns about the ubiquity of job insecurity in academia have become increasingly prominent, the potential implications of job insecurity for the health and well-being of faculty require attention. Specifically, these implications may vary between groups within academia, yet little is known about such variations, particularly with respect to different indicators of health and well-being. This study aims to identify and examine profiles of job insecurity (including quantitative and qualitative dimensions) in relation to exhaustion, depressive symptoms, well-being, and work-family conflict among faculty in Sweden. Self-reports in questionnaires were collected in 2021 from a representative sample of faculty, with a doctoral degree, working in Swedish public higher education institutions (N = 2,729 respondents; 48% women; average age: 50 years; 82% born in Sweden). Latent profile analysis was conducted to identify profiles of job insecurity, followed by statistical comparisons on demographic covariates and health-related indicators across profiles. The latent profile analysis revealed five job insecurity profiles: the moderately insecure (n = 215), the secure (n = 1777), the secure; quality-concerned (n = 406), the insecure; employment-concerned (n = 177), and the insecure (n = 154). Twelve percent of the sample was identified as vulnerable, particularly the insecure profile, where these individuals may be most at a risk for exhaustion disorder and depression. Among faculty in Sweden, quantitative and qualitative dimensions of job insecurity appear to be closely connected, with the qualitative dimension seemingly more informative for health-related indicators.
工作不安全感是一种与各种健康相关损害有关的工作压力源。随着学术界对工作不安全感普遍存在的担忧日益突出,工作不安全感对教师健康和福祉的潜在影响需要引起关注。具体而言,这些影响在学术界内部的不同群体之间可能有所不同,但对于这种差异知之甚少,尤其是在健康和福祉的不同指标方面。本研究旨在识别和考察瑞典教师中与疲惫、抑郁症状、幸福感以及工作-家庭冲突相关的工作不安全感概况(包括数量和质量维度)。2021年,我们从瑞典公立高等教育机构中具有博士学位的教师代表性样本中收集了问卷中的自我报告(N = 2729名受访者;48%为女性;平均年龄:50岁;82%出生于瑞典)。进行了潜在类别分析以识别工作不安全感概况,随后对各概况在人口统计学协变量和健康相关指标上进行统计比较。潜在类别分析揭示了五种工作不安全感概况:中度不安全型(n = 215)、安全型(n = 1777)、安全且关注质量型(n = 406)、不安全且关注就业型(n = 177)以及不安全型(n = 154)。12%的样本被确定为易受影响群体,特别是不安全型,这些个体可能最容易患上疲惫症和抑郁症。在瑞典教师中,工作不安全感的数量和质量维度似乎紧密相连,质量维度对于健康相关指标似乎更具信息量。