• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术说明:使用实时动态设备评估牲畜跟踪的 GPS 传感器精度。

Technical note: assessing GPS sensor accuracy using real-time kinematic device for livestock tracking.

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.

Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae253.

DOI:10.1093/jas/skae253
PMID:39187979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11450325/
Abstract

The technical aspects of global positioning system (GPS) sensors have been improved substantially over the years, making them valuable and popular tools for livestock tracking. Using GPS sensors allows producers and researchers to locate grazing livestock, monitor their behavior and distribution, and gather referencing information about the health status of the animals and pastures. However, interpreting the behavior of grazing livestock, such as cattle, from GPS data can be difficult due to positioning inaccuracies. Without knowing the positioning accuracy range of GPS sensors, achieving high-level confidence in determining grazing densities and identifying abnormal livestock movement patterns is challenging. In this study, the positioning accuracy of 3 different types of commercial GPS sensors was assessed using a survey-grade real-time kinematics (RTK) device. We outlined the procedures and essential equations and compared the recorded locations from the GPS sensors with reference locations collected from the RTK device. The results demonstrated statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in positioning accuracy between different types of GPS sensors. The circular error probable (CEP) at 95% probability levels (CEP95) of the 3 sensors ranged from 2.46 to 11.06 m. This accuracy varied among individual sensors within the same brand and across different brands, which underscores the importance of evaluating the positioning accuracy of GPS sensors in livestock tracking. This study provides significant insights for animal scientists, ecologists, and livestock producers engaged in GPS sensor-related research and practices.

摘要

多年来,全球定位系统(GPS)传感器的技术方面有了很大的改进,使它们成为跟踪牲畜的有价值和受欢迎的工具。使用 GPS 传感器可以让生产者和研究人员定位放牧牲畜,监测它们的行为和分布,并收集有关动物和牧场健康状况的参考信息。然而,由于定位不准确,从 GPS 数据中解读放牧牲畜(如牛)的行为可能具有挑战性。如果不知道 GPS 传感器的定位精度范围,就很难确定放牧密度并识别异常的牲畜运动模式,从而获得高度的置信度。在这项研究中,使用测地实时动态(RTK)设备评估了 3 种不同类型的商业 GPS 传感器的定位精度。我们概述了程序和基本方程,并将 GPS 传感器记录的位置与 RTK 设备收集的参考位置进行了比较。结果表明,不同类型的 GPS 传感器之间的定位精度存在统计学上的显著差异(P < 0.05)。3 个传感器的 95%概率水平的圆误差概率(CEP95)范围为 2.46 至 11.06 米。同一品牌内不同传感器以及不同品牌之间的精度存在差异,这突显了在牲畜跟踪中评估 GPS 传感器定位精度的重要性。本研究为从事与 GPS 传感器相关的研究和实践的动物科学家、生态学家和牲畜生产者提供了重要的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11450325/cb8e0c25e396/skae253_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11450325/a63e7950d979/skae253_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11450325/c18b772f2d78/skae253_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11450325/538051258e20/skae253_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11450325/b868f1e491c4/skae253_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11450325/cb8e0c25e396/skae253_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11450325/a63e7950d979/skae253_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11450325/c18b772f2d78/skae253_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11450325/538051258e20/skae253_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11450325/b868f1e491c4/skae253_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11450325/cb8e0c25e396/skae253_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Technical note: assessing GPS sensor accuracy using real-time kinematic device for livestock tracking.技术说明:使用实时动态设备评估牲畜跟踪的 GPS 传感器精度。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae253.
2
Use of GPS tracking collars and accelerometers for rangeland livestock production research.GPS跟踪项圈和加速度计在牧场畜牧生产研究中的应用。
Transl Anim Sci. 2018 Jan 25;2(1):81-88. doi: 10.1093/tas/txx006. eCollection 2018 Feb.
3
Factors Affecting Site Use Preference of Grazing Cattle Studied from 2000 to 2020 through GPS Tracking: A Review.2000 年至 2020 年通过 GPS 追踪研究放牧牛的栖息地使用偏好的影响因素:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 11;21(8):2696. doi: 10.3390/s21082696.
4
Assessing herbivore foraging behavior with GPS collars in a semiarid grassland.利用 GPS 项圈评估半干旱草原食草动物的觅食行为。
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Mar 15;13(3):3711-23. doi: 10.3390/s130303711.
5
Cattle transhumance and agropastoral nomadic herding practices in Central Cameroon.喀麦隆中部的牛群季节性迁徙及农牧游牧放牧方式
BMC Vet Res. 2018 Jul 3;14(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1515-z.
6
Feasibility study on the spatial and temporal movement of Samburu's cattle and wildlife in Kenya using GPS radio-tracking, remote sensing and GIS.利用 GPS 无线电跟踪、遥感和 GIS 技术研究肯尼亚桑布鲁人的牛群和野生动物的时空运动的可行性研究。
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Aug 1;111(1-2):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 25.
7
Temporal Changes in Association Patterns of Cattle Grazing at Two Stocking Densities in a Central Arizona Rangeland.亚利桑那州中部牧场两种放牧密度下牛群放牧关联模式的时间变化
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 8;11(9):2635. doi: 10.3390/ani11092635.
8
GIS-based methodology for tracking the grazing cattle site use.基于地理信息系统的追踪放牧牛群场地使用情况的方法。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 24;10(13):e33166. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33166. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
9
An integration of GPS with INS sensors for precise long-baseline kinematic positioning.GPS 与 INS 传感器的集成,用于精确的长基线运动学定位。
Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(10):9424-38. doi: 10.3390/s101009424. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
10
Real-Time Monitoring of Grazing Cattle Using LORA-WAN Sensors to Improve Precision in Detecting Animal Welfare Implications via Daily Distance Walked Metrics.使用 LoRa-WAN 传感器对放牧牛进行实时监测,以通过每日行走距离指标提高检测动物福利影响的精度。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 16;13(16):2641. doi: 10.3390/ani13162641.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of GPS/GPRS tracking devices improves with increased fix interval and is not affected by animal deployment.GPS/GPRS 跟踪设备的性能随着固定间隔的增加而提高,且不受动物部署的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 30;17(3):e0265541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265541. eCollection 2022.
2
Review: Precision Livestock Farming technologies in pasture-based livestock systems.综述:基于牧场的牲畜系统中的精准畜牧业养殖技术。
Animal. 2022 Jan;16(1):100429. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100429. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
3
Factors Affecting Site Use Preference of Grazing Cattle Studied from 2000 to 2020 through GPS Tracking: A Review.
2000 年至 2020 年通过 GPS 追踪研究放牧牛的栖息地使用偏好的影响因素:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 11;21(8):2696. doi: 10.3390/s21082696.
4
Use of GPS tracking collars and accelerometers for rangeland livestock production research.GPS跟踪项圈和加速度计在牧场畜牧生产研究中的应用。
Transl Anim Sci. 2018 Jan 25;2(1):81-88. doi: 10.1093/tas/txx006. eCollection 2018 Feb.
5
Review of GPS collar deployments and performance on nonhuman primates.对非人灵长类动物使用GPS项圈的情况及性能的综述。
Primates. 2020 May;61(3):373-387. doi: 10.1007/s10329-020-00793-7. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
6
ECOLOGY. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet.生态学。陆地动物追踪——生命与星球之“眼”。
Science. 2015 Jun 12;348(6240):aaa2478. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2478.
7
Assessing herbivore foraging behavior with GPS collars in a semiarid grassland.利用 GPS 项圈评估半干旱草原食草动物的觅食行为。
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Mar 15;13(3):3711-23. doi: 10.3390/s130303711.
8
Portable global positioning system receivers: static validity and environmental conditions.便携式全球定位系统接收器:静态有效性和环境条件。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):e19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.013.
9
Management strategies for optimal grazing distribution and use of arid rangelands.干旱牧场最佳放牧分布与利用的管理策略
J Anim Sci. 2004;82 E-Suppl:E147-153. doi: 10.2527/2004.8213_supplE147x.
10
Cattle behavior.牛的行为。
J Dairy Sci. 1981 Jun;64(6):1318-29. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(81)82705-1.