• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在以不同高度下台阶时评估足底生物力学。

Evaluating plantar biomechanics while descending a single step with different heights.

作者信息

Guo Panjing, Zhang Xiajing, Xu Haoran, Wang Ruiqin, Li Yumin, Xu Chengshuo, Yang Yu, Zhang Linlin, Adams Roger, Han Jia, Lyu Jie

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Jinshan District Central Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.

College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Aug 12;12:1431988. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1431988. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1431988
PMID:39188374
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11345276/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the plantar biomechanics of healthy young males as they descend a single transition step from varying heights.

METHODS

Thirty healthy young males participated the experiment using the F-scan insole plantar pressure system in which participants made single transition steps descent from four step heights (5, 15, 25, and 35 cm), leading with their dominant or non-dominant foot. Plantar pressure data were collected for 5 s during the period between landing touchdown and standing on the ground. Landing at each step height was repeated three times, with a five-minute rest between different height trials.

RESULTS

At 5 cm and 15 cm steps, participants demonstrated a rearfoot landing strategy on both sides. However, forefoot contact was observed at heights of 25 cm and 35 cm. Parameters related to center of plantar pressure (COP) of the leading foot were significantly larger compared to the trailing foot ( < 0.001), increased with higher step heights. Vertical ground reaction forces for the biped, leading and trailing feet decreased with increasing step height (all < 0.05). The leading foot had a higher proportion of overall and forefoot loads, and a lower proportion of rearfoot load compared to the trailing foot ( < 0.001). The overall load on the dominant side was lower than that on the non-dominant side for both the leading and trailing feet ( < 0.001). For the trailing foot, forefoot load on the dominant side was lower than that on the non-dominant side, however, the opposite result appeared in rearfoot load ( < 0.001). Upon the leading foot landing, forefoot load exceeded the rearfoot load for the dominant ( < 0.001) and non-dominant sides ( < 0.001). Upon the trailing foot landing, forefoot load was lower than the rearfoot load for the dominant ( < 0.001) and non-dominant sides ( = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

When the characteristics of biomechanical stability are compromised by step height, landing foot, and footedness factors - due to altered foot landing strategies, changing COP, or uneven force distribution - ability to control motion efficiently and respond adaptively to the forces experienced during movement is challenged, increasing the likelihood of loss of dynamic balance, with a consequent increased risk of ankle sprains and falls.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查健康年轻男性从不同高度下台阶时的足底生物力学情况。

方法

30名健康年轻男性参与了使用F-scan鞋垫足底压力系统的实验,参与者分别用优势脚或非优势脚从四个台阶高度(5厘米、15厘米、25厘米和35厘米)下单个台阶。在着地 touchdown 到站立在地面的时间段内收集5秒的足底压力数据。每个台阶高度的着地过程重复三次,不同高度试验之间休息5分钟。

结果

在5厘米和15厘米的台阶上,参与者两侧均表现出后足着地策略。然而,在25厘米和35厘米的高度观察到前足接触。与后足相比,优势脚的足底压力中心(COP)相关参数显著更大(<0.001),且随着台阶高度增加而增大。双足、优势脚和非优势脚的垂直地面反作用力随着台阶高度增加而减小(均<0.05)。与后足相比,优势脚在前足和总负荷中所占比例更高,后足负荷所占比例更低(<0.001)。优势侧的总负荷在优势脚和非优势脚中均低于非优势侧(<0.001)。对于非优势脚,优势侧的前足负荷低于非优势侧,然而,后足负荷则相反(<0.001)。在优势脚着地时,优势侧(<0.001)和非优势侧(<0.001)的前足负荷超过后足负荷。在非优势脚着地时,优势侧(<0.001)和非优势侧(=0.019)的前足负荷低于后足负荷。

结论

当生物力学稳定性特征因台阶高度、着地脚和足偏好因素而受到损害时——由于着地策略改变、COP变化或力分布不均——有效控制运动以及对运动中所受力量进行适应性反应的能力受到挑战,增加了动态平衡丧失的可能性,从而增加了脚踝扭伤和跌倒的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc6/11345276/c28cbe77f28c/fbioe-12-1431988-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc6/11345276/74ba3224ddcb/fbioe-12-1431988-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc6/11345276/2e293ef9862d/fbioe-12-1431988-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc6/11345276/3e3ff59c3625/fbioe-12-1431988-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc6/11345276/5862a5363b3b/fbioe-12-1431988-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc6/11345276/c28cbe77f28c/fbioe-12-1431988-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc6/11345276/74ba3224ddcb/fbioe-12-1431988-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc6/11345276/2e293ef9862d/fbioe-12-1431988-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc6/11345276/3e3ff59c3625/fbioe-12-1431988-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc6/11345276/5862a5363b3b/fbioe-12-1431988-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc6/11345276/c28cbe77f28c/fbioe-12-1431988-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating plantar biomechanics while descending a single step with different heights.在以不同高度下台阶时评估足底生物力学。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Aug 12;12:1431988. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1431988. eCollection 2024.
2
Do visual and step height factors cause imbalance during bipedal and unipedal stances? A plantar pressure perspective.视觉因素和步高因素是否会导致双足和单足站立时的失衡?来自足底压力的视角。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Aug 17;11:1253056. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1253056. eCollection 2023.
3
Foot and Ankle Kinematics During Descent From Varying Step Heights.不同步高下降过程中的足踝关节运动学
J Appl Biomech. 2017 Dec 1;33(6):453-459. doi: 10.1123/jab.2016-0301. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
4
Comparative analysis of ankle injury kinematics and dynamics in basketball players: forefoot landing vs. rearfoot landing modes.篮球运动员踝关节损伤的运动学与动力学对比分析:前脚掌落地与后脚掌落地方式
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Sep 15;15(9):5843-5849. eCollection 2023.
5
Total contact cast wall load in patients with a plantar forefoot ulcer and diabetes.患有足底前足溃疡和糖尿病患者的全接触石膏壁负荷。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2016 Jan 7;9:2. doi: 10.1186/s13047-015-0119-0. eCollection 2016.
6
Comparison of Foot Kinematics and Foot Plantar Area and Pressure Among Five Different Closed Kinematic Tasks.五种不同闭链运动任务中足部运动学、足底面积和压力的比较。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2020 Sep 1;110(5). doi: 10.7547/17-226.
7
Impact forces upon landing single, double, and triple revolution jumps in figure skaters.花样滑冰运动员单跳、双跳和三周转跳落地时的冲击力。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1997 Apr;12(3):S11. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(97)88322-2.
8
Multi-segment foot kinematics and ground reaction forces during gait of individuals with plantar fasciitis.足底筋膜炎患者行走时多节段足部运动学和地面反作用力。
J Biomech. 2014 Aug 22;47(11):2571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
9
The forefoot-to-rearfoot plantar pressure ratio is increased in severe diabetic neuropathy and can predict foot ulceration.重度糖尿病神经病变患者的前足与后足足底压力比升高,且该比值可预测足部溃疡。
Diabetes Care. 2002 Jun;25(6):1066-71. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.6.1066.
10
Bipedal Static Supination and Dynamic Forefoot Loading Characteristics in Taiwanese College Badminton Players: A Cross-Sectional Study.台湾大学生羽毛球运动员的双足静态旋后和动态前足负荷特征:一项横断面研究。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Apr 21;10(4):498. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10040498.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic balance control in healthy young women during stair descent: a plantar pressure-based study.健康年轻女性下楼梯时的动态平衡控制:一项基于足底压力的研究。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jan 29;13:1517471. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1517471. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Do visual and step height factors cause imbalance during bipedal and unipedal stances? A plantar pressure perspective.视觉因素和步高因素是否会导致双足和单足站立时的失衡?来自足底压力的视角。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Aug 17;11:1253056. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1253056. eCollection 2023.
2
Effect of Different Landing Heights and Loads on Ankle Inversion Proprioception during Landing in Individuals with and without Chronic Ankle Instability.不同着陆高度和负荷对有或无慢性踝关节不稳个体着陆时踝关节内翻本体感觉的影响。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Nov 30;9(12):743. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9120743.
3
The influence of step-down technique on lower extremity mechanics during curb descent.
下台阶技术对下台阶过程中下肢力学的影响。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2021 Dec;61:102590. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2021.102590. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
4
The influence of age and fall history on single transition step kinematics.年龄和跌倒史对单步过渡运动学的影响。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 Oct;89:105456. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105456. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
5
The difference of in-shoe plantar pressure between level walking and stair walking in healthy males.健康男性平地行走和上楼梯行走时鞋内足底压力的差异。
J Biomech. 2021 Jun 9;122:110446. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110446. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
6
Synergies in the ground reaction forces and moments during double support in curb negotiation in young and older adults.年轻人和老年人在路缘协商双支撑阶段地面反作用力和力矩的协同作用。
J Biomech. 2020 Jun 9;106:109837. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109837. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
Foot strike alters ground reaction force and knee load when stepping down during ongoing walking.在持续行走时,脚步着地改变了地面反作用力和膝关节的受力。
Gait Posture. 2020 Feb;76:327-333. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.12.019. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
8
Stumbling prediction based on plantar pressure distribution.基于足底压力分布的跌倒预测
Work. 2019;64(4):705-712. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193032.
9
Dynamic postural control during (in)visible curb descent at fast versus comfortable walking velocity.在(不)可见路缘下降时,以快于舒适步行速度与慢于舒适步行速度进行动态姿势控制的比较。
Gait Posture. 2019 Jun;71:38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
10
Stability-normalised walking speed: A new approach for human gait perturbation research.稳定性归一化行走速度:一种新的人类步态扰动研究方法。
J Biomech. 2019 Apr 18;87:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 Feb 26.