Ogihara Yoshito, Yamada Norikazu, Izumi Daisuke, Sato Yuichi, Sato Toru, Nakaya Hitoshi, Mori Tatsuya, Ota Satoshi, Makino Midori, Ogura Toru, Tamaru Satoshi, Nishimura Yuki, Tanigawa Takashi, Kasai Atsunobu, Nishikawa Masakatsu, Dohi Kaoru
Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Kuwana City Medical Center, Kuwana, Japan.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024 Jul 14;8(5):102515. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102515. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Limited evidence exists regarding the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients diagnosed with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who are at risk of thrombosis extension whether they receive anticoagulation therapy or not.
The study aimed to investigate the incidence of recurrent VTE and the impact of rivaroxaban in this patient population.
This open-label, exploratory, and randomized controlled trial was conducted at 7 centers in Japan between April 2019 and April 2022. Adult patients with isolated distal DVT at risk of thrombosis extension received either rivaroxaban combined with physical therapy or physical therapy alone for 90 days. Whole-leg ultrasound was performed at 14 and 90 days. We assessed a composite outcome of symptomatic or asymptomatic proximal DVT or symptomatic pulmonary embolism as the primary outcome until the end of the treatment period using an intention-to-treat analysis. Major bleeding was evaluated as a key secondary outcome.
Out of 90 enrolled patients, 3 were excluded due to withdrawal of consent; therefore, we analyzed 87 participants. The rivaroxaban group ( = 42) reported no primary outcomes (0%; 95% CI, 0.0%-8.4%), whereas the physical therapy group ( = 45) had 2 cases of symptomatic proximal DVT (4.4%; 95% CI, 0.5%-15.1%). Major bleeding events occurred in 4 patients in the rivaroxaban group (9.5%; 95% CI, 2.7%-22.6%), whereas no events occurred in the physical therapy group (0%; 95% CI, 0%-7.9%).
Preliminary data suggest that rivaroxaban may reduce the risk of VTE recurrence among this patient subset, albeit with an increased incidence of bleeding events.
对于诊断为孤立性远端深静脉血栓形成(DVT)且有血栓扩展风险的患者,无论是否接受抗凝治疗,关于复发性静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的发生率,现有证据有限。
本研究旨在调查该患者群体中复发性VTE的发生率以及利伐沙班的影响。
这项开放标签、探索性随机对照试验于2019年4月至2022年4月在日本的7个中心进行。有血栓扩展风险的孤立性远端DVT成年患者接受利伐沙班联合物理治疗或仅接受物理治疗90天。在第14天和第90天进行全腿超声检查。我们使用意向性分析评估了有症状或无症状近端DVT或有症状肺栓塞的复合结局作为主要结局,直至治疗期结束。主要出血被评估为关键次要结局。
在90名入组患者中,3名因撤回同意而被排除;因此,我们分析了87名参与者。利伐沙班组(n = 42)未报告主要结局(0%;95%CI,0.0%-8.4%),而物理治疗组(n = 45)有2例有症状近端DVT(4.4%;95%CI,0.5%-15.1%)。利伐沙班组有4名患者发生主要出血事件(9.5%;95%CI,2.7%-22.6%),而物理治疗组未发生事件(0%;95%CI,0%-7.9%)。
初步数据表明,利伐沙班可能降低该患者亚组中VTE复发的风险,尽管出血事件的发生率有所增加。