Seki Masafumi
Division of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka City, Saitama, Japan.
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Aug 20;17:3621-3624. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S475833. eCollection 2024.
Both nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV-r) and ensitrelvir (ESV) are similar protease inhibitors that act against 3C-like protease (3CL protease) which is related the viral replication of SARS-CoV-2, and are recommended as oral treatment for COVID-19 patients in the guidance. However, NMV-r was approved in 2022 for the treatment of patients who are at high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19 based on the clinical trial data during severe original strain period, whereas ESV was approved in 2023 for the treatment of non-risk patients based on the clinical trial data during mild Omicron strain period in Japan. In this study, we investigated the differences in treatment patterns and patient characteristics between COVID-19 patients treated with NMV-r and ESV. NMV-r has usually been used for elderly patients with malignant tumors in the hospital, whereas ESV has been used for younger patients in the outpatient clinic as the common practice. It has been suggested that NMV-r and ESV have been used differently in Japan because there might be gaps in the implementation periods and the evidence from clinical trials. We should use each oral agent appropriately and make different recommendations in the guidance in the near future.
奈玛特韦/利托那韦(NMV-r)和恩昔替尼(ESV)都是类似的蛋白酶抑制剂,作用于与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒复制相关的3C样蛋白酶(3CL蛋白酶),并在指南中被推荐作为新冠肺炎患者的口服治疗药物。然而,NMV-r于2022年获批,用于治疗根据原始毒株流行期严重阶段的临床试验数据有进展为重症新冠肺炎高风险的患者,而ESV于2023年获批,用于治疗根据日本奥密克戎毒株流行期轻症阶段的临床试验数据的非高风险患者。在本研究中,我们调查了接受NMV-r和ESV治疗的新冠肺炎患者在治疗模式和患者特征方面的差异。NMV-r通常用于医院中有恶性肿瘤的老年患者,而ESV通常用于门诊的年轻患者。有人认为,在日本NMV-r和ESV的使用方式不同,因为在实施时间和临床试验证据方面可能存在差距。我们应该在不久的将来在指南中适当使用每种口服药物并给出不同的建议。