Eeckhoudt Jochen, Alonso Mercedes, Geerlings Paul, De Proft Frank
Research Group of General Chemistry (ALGC), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2024 Sep 10;20(17):7430-7442. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00665. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
While high-pressure chemistry has a well-established history, methods to simulate pressure at the single-molecule level have been somewhat lacking. The current work aims at comparing two static models (XP-PCM and GOSTSHYP) to apply isotropic pressure to single molecules, focusing on the equilibrium bond length and electric dipole moment of diatomic molecules. Numerical challenges arising in the potential energy surface using the XP-PCM method were examined, and a pragmatic approach was followed to mitigate these. The definition of the cavity was scrutinized, and two approaches to retrieve the isotropic character that could potentially be lost when using the standard methodology were suggested. Subsequently, equilibrium bond lengths under pressure were evaluated, showing reasonable agreement between GOSTSHYP and XP-PCM, but some discrepancies persist. A Taylor series analysis introduced elsewhere was then applied to rationalize the observed trends in terms of the bond surface. Finally, the dipole moment was shown to be highly sensitive to the cavity definition, and qualitative agreement necessitates the use of our adapted procedure.
虽然高压化学有着悠久的历史,但在单分子水平上模拟压力的方法却有所欠缺。当前的工作旨在比较两种静态模型(XP-PCM和GOSTSHYP),以便将各向同性压力应用于单分子,重点关注双原子分子的平衡键长和电偶极矩。研究了使用XP-PCM方法时势能面中出现的数值挑战,并采用了一种务实的方法来缓解这些挑战。对空腔的定义进行了仔细审查,并提出了两种方法来恢复使用标准方法时可能会丢失的各向同性特征。随后,评估了压力下的平衡键长,结果表明GOSTSHYP和XP-PCM之间存在合理的一致性,但仍存在一些差异。然后应用在其他地方引入的泰勒级数分析,从键表面的角度解释观察到的趋势。最后,结果表明偶极矩对空腔定义高度敏感,定性一致性需要使用我们调整后的程序。