Kültürsay Barkın, Keskin Berhan, Tanyeri Seda, Külahçıoğlu Şeyhmus, Hakgör Aykun, Mutlu Deniz, Buluş Çağdaş, Tokgöz Hacer Ceren, Yücel Enver, Sekban Ahmet, Sırma Dicle, Karagöz Ali, Tanboğa İbrahim Halil, Özdemir Nihal, Kaymaz Cihangir
Department of Cardiology, Kartal Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Department of Cardiology, Kocaeli City Hospital, Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Anatol J Cardiol. 2024 Aug 3;28(10):479-85. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2024.4110.
Currently available risk stratification models for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) include hemodynamic status, cardiac biomarkers, right ventricle (RV) dysfunction on imaging, and clinical scores. Focusing on the length-tension relationship of the ventricle might have a superior predictive capability over RV dysfunction in terms of mortality and classification of patients with acute PE. In this study, our hypothesis suggests that the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)/systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) ratio has superior predictive capability for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute PE compared to TAPSE or sPAP as distinct measures.
This single-center study comprised retrospectively evaluated 703 patients referred to our tertiary cardiovascular center with acute PE. We divided patients into quartiles based on the TAPSE/sPAP ratio. Different models were developed to quantify the predictive relationship between in-hospital death and echocardiographic measurements. A base model was created with variables including risk status and RV/LV ratio >1. Then, to evaluate the predictive contribution of each measurement; TAPSE/sPAP, TAPSE, and sPAP were sequentially added to the base model. After that, the performance of each model was evaluated.
Predictive and discriminative power was the highest in model containing TAPSE/sPAP. There was still a significant inverse association between TAPSE/sPAP and the risk of in-hospital death even after adjusting for risk status and RV/LV ratio >1. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for TAPSE/sPAP revealed the best cut-off value as 0.34.
The outcomes of our study reveal that the ratio of TAPSE/sPAP serves as a more potent predictor of mortality than either of the 2 measurements taken separately. The interpretation and utilization of the TAPSE/sPAP cut-off value in acute PE can assist in identifying patients at risk of deterioration and guide the consideration of more intensive treatment options across all risk groups.
目前可用的急性肺栓塞(PE)风险分层模型包括血流动力学状态、心脏生物标志物、影像学上的右心室(RV)功能障碍以及临床评分。就急性PE患者的死亡率和分类而言,关注心室的长度 - 张力关系可能比RV功能障碍具有更强的预测能力。在本研究中,我们的假设表明,与单独的三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(TAPSE)或收缩期肺动脉压(sPAP)测量相比,TAPSE/收缩期肺动脉压(sPAP)比值对急性PE患者的院内死亡率具有更强的预测能力。
这项单中心研究回顾性评估了703例转诊至我们三级心血管中心的急性PE患者。我们根据TAPSE/sPAP比值将患者分为四分位数。开发了不同的模型来量化院内死亡与超声心动图测量之间的预测关系。创建了一个基础模型,其变量包括风险状态和RV/LV比值>1。然后,为了评估每个测量值的预测贡献;TAPSE/sPAP、TAPSE和sPAP被依次添加到基础模型中。之后,评估每个模型的性能。
包含TAPSE/sPAP的模型预测和判别能力最高。即使在调整风险状态和RV/LV比值>1后,TAPSE/sPAP与院内死亡风险之间仍存在显著的负相关。TAPSE/sPAP的受试者工作特征曲线分析显示最佳截断值为0.34。
我们的研究结果表明,TAPSE/sPAP比值比单独的两项测量中的任何一项都更能有效预测死亡率。急性PE中TAPSE/sPAP截断值的解释和应用有助于识别有病情恶化风险的患者,并指导对所有风险组进行更强化治疗方案的考虑。